Ancestry tests for bollywood stars?

CONTEST : IPL 2026 Prediction Game

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

1111251

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#91

Haryana jatts are interesting on harrapa

Baloch/West Asian : 37%

South Indian/ASI : 27%

North East Europe : 18%

Southern Europe : 5%

Other : 13%

Their northern europe component seems to be the highest in south asia, even more so then the much fairer pathans, who have around 14-15% of that component on average

Quote

1111251

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#92

does anyone know ancestry of Neil Nithin Mukesh and his family? what are they? Kashmiri Brahmins?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1111251

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#93

Also are there any jatts from haryana in bollywood?

Quote

1020442

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#94

Originally posted by: Mard
does anyone know ancestry of Neil Nithin Mukesh and his family? what are they? Kashmiri Brahmins?

Nopes, they are Mathurs ( UP Kayastha afaik) .

Quote

1020442

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#95

Originally posted by: Mard
Also are there any jatts from haryana in bollywood?

From Jatland (Haryana , West UP) :

Randeep Hooda

Mohit Ahlawat

Mallika Sehrawat

Chitraganda SIngh

Mahima Chaudhary - Half Jat I read somewhere

Kirti Kulhari

Akash Dahiya

Himanshu Malik

Parvin Dabas

Quote

1111251

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#96

^ interesting, I wonder if they have 18-20% Northern European component in them like that haryana jatts tested.

Quote

Panthera

@Panthera

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#97

Originally posted by: AnikaLoveshivay
The intermingling of races has led to a mixed population and a fairer skin tone in Indian sub continent .
Muslims ruled over India for thousands of years and frankly speaking nobody can actually remember thousands years old family history . Native Indian were always dark skinned

Muslims ruled over India for 800 years, not thousands. Not that 800 years is not a long time. After the muslims, the british ruled for 250 years.

As for Islam, Muhammad started preaching it in 610AD, so Islam is only 1400 years old, not thousands of years old. It is the newest/youngest of the Abrahamic religions, or any major religion for that matter.

Quote

1111251

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#98

Originally posted by: Panthera

Muslims ruled over India for 800 years, not thousands. Not that 800 years is not a long time. After the muslims, the british ruled for 250 years.

As for Islam, Muhammad started preaching it in 610AD, so Islam is only 1400 years old, not thousands of years old. It is the newest/youngest of the Abrahamic religions, or any major religion for that matter.

Muslim rule hardly had genetic impact on south asia, all these studies have shown that most mixing in South asia happend 2000 to 4000 years ago, when the population was smaller