Originally posted by: AuthorSneha
Both the scenarios are different. Cannot compare it with Akshara hid about Abhir from abhimanyu..
Like I said, Should she have hidden about Abhir being abhimanyu's biological son from birlas is subjective but I can understand why she did it ."Mere pass tumhe batane ki koi vajah nahi thi. Maine nahi btaya kyunki tumhare aur abhir ke beech sirf khoon ka rishta hai, asal mein tum uske baap nahi ho"
The answer for why Akshara hid was given by her when Abhimanyu questioned ki bataya kyu nahi. Remember the dialogue when Abhi asked her ek bure pati ki saza ek baap ko kyu di ?
Though yes, I agree abhimanyu should have known. Because Marraige where a child is involved is not the same like a relationship break up where you can completely cut off without any communication. Yes, abhimanyu deserved to know about abhir, but I also understand why she hid it, though legally it's wrong.
& This is only speculation, we don't know if Akshara has not informed manjari about abhimanyu 's death. Also, the goenkas treated akshara horribly & if she cut off contact with them, she did no wrong. My point was only, if she has not informed manjari, then she is at fault.
9