Originally posted by: AuthorSneha
Both the scenarios are different. Cannot compare it with Akshara hid about Abhir from abhimanyu..
Like I said, Should she have hidden about Abhir being abhimanyu's biological son from birlas is subjective but I can understand why she did it ."Mere pass tumhe batane ki koi vajah nahi thi. Maine nahi btaya kyunki tumhare aur abhir ke beech sirf khoon ka rishta hai, asal mein tum uske baap nahi ho"
The answer for why Akshara hid was given by her when Abhimanyu questioned ki bataya kyu nahi. Remember the dialogue when Abhi asked her ek bure pati ki saza ek baap ko kyu di ?& This is only speculation, we don't know if Akshara has not informed manjari about abhimanyu 's death. Also, the goenkas treated akshara horribly & if she cut off contact with them, she did no wrong. My point was only, if she has not informed manjari, then she is at fault.
@bold - the only and very important wajah was that abhir was his son and they were related by blood!!!
Isse badi koi wajah ho hi nahi sakta. So that statement makes no sense to me.
The palnewala BS which Sharma's were boasting about!!! Still wanted a child of his own with khoon ka rishta.
And as I mentioned nobody knows about abhi and abhir's death because if Birla's knew they would've informed Goenka's for sure.
9