Section 306 - Page 5

Originally posted by: shivani109

Darling UR confused n mixing up two cases.I guess courts deal with one case at a time..thts my common sense, I find u always deviate from the topic, ths not good practice is it???? we are purely discussing Tapasya as criminal not Sid or anyone else..

Originally posted by: lambooo

I pity on you. This is the recent Supreme Court ruling. ""In order to convict a person under Section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea (intention) to commit the offence, It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position that he committed suicide," _Justice Bhandari.

No if you say Tappu was not provoking Vansh by her taunt than what on the earth the meaning of provokation??? I can pity on you. Nothing more.

Originally posted by: lambooo

I pity on you. This is the recent Supreme Court ruling. ""In order to convict a person under Section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea (intention) to commit the offence, It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position that he committed suicide," _Justice Bhandari.

No if you say Tappu was not provoking Vansh by her taunt than what on the earth the meaning of provokation??? I can pity on you. Nothing more.

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

What am i confused about? I simply pointed out a mistake of lamboo ji! it is certainly true that in this case as a separate thing I thought to mention...tapu would be charged with conspiracy to commit murder, not attempt to commit murder! now tell me if im wrong and show me some proof!

Originally posted by: shivani109

I shall leave u to ponder over ur words n gather ur thoughts, Darling speak only about Tapasya n her crimes, dont get confused n confuse others mixing everyone's crimes in one arguement..i guess Courts dont accept ..tht.do they...

Originally posted by: shivani109

Shyams je I dont much about IPC, I guess we have to wait for some true expert opinion on this...like how our Lamboo je does...Lamboo ji kindly explain if u dont mind..about 'the forced marriage which Tapu baba did with Veer ?'

To my good eyes😳, its fraud n deception absolutely, n tht marriage is null n void, n fraud n decption are punishable offences in any court of law all over the world. Law across the world is there to uphold humanity n good morality.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

agree....they dont!!!!
shall i repeat for the third time.......its time.....and so on

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

mostly...but there are many loopholes! law doesnt just make punishable whatever the society deems immoral!😊 actaully if it was like that why wud I need to waste 4 years in completing a Bachelor of Law?😆