Section 306 - Page 15

Originally posted by: lambooo

So if somebody has a kingsize ego and to satisfy his/her ego and can go to any extent why you should somebody defend him/her? That park scene proved beyond doubt that she never loved Veer. only tried to possess him. I cannot even dream of meting out such behavior to somebody I love or claim to love. So she was settling score, no love was there or now.

ji if u hurt ur love there is nothing to prove u dont love them! the love is there but at the times other emotions take over! waise to at that time even i was sure she didint love him but i think i am just keeping my fath after he dialogue in the epi b4 last where she said she cant stay quiet or veer will get sazaa. now if she didnt love him she wudnt mind if he got her blame!😊

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

ji if u hurt ur love there is nothing to prove u dont love them! the love is there but at the times other emotions take over! waise to at that time even i was sure she didint love him but i think i am just keeping my fath after he dialogue in the epi b4 last where she said she cant stay quiet or veer will get sazaa. now if she didnt love him she wudnt mind if he got her blame!😊

I dont know your views. But love cannot be selective or conditional or circumstantial. If you love somebody it is a total surrender. Love is always to give, not demand. You cannot get true love by demand. So you cannot say that at one point she did not love him, at this point she loved him, at this time she loved him a little, at that point she loved him fully....love is not a commodity you can weigh on a scale...either you love somebody or don't. there cannot be circumstantial love.

Originally posted by: lambooo

I dont know your views. But love cannot be selective or conditional or circumstantial. If you love somebody it is a total surrender. Love is always to give, not demand. You cannot get true love by demand. So you cannot say that at one point she did not love him, at this point she loved him, at this time she loved him a little, at that point she loved him fully....love is not a commodity you can weigh on a scale...either you love somebody or don't. there cannot be circumstantial love.

u misunderstand ji😊 normal humans would say all this and it is right! But Tapu and others like her the love is always buried deep at the bottom of the heart! Sometimes it comes to the surface for short periods and sometimes the other emotions get the better of them! Its not like she doesnt love him one day and does the next! I dunno when it started but I think she does...at lest her words convinced me 80%

I do not argue with you or enlighten you. But love as I understand is based on truth and truthfullness. If you deceive, tell lies, try to possess him/her through either force or compulsion, under no circumstances it can be termed as love. It can be termed as possession of somebody you desire. I think it stands true for Taps. She is trying to possess Veer for whatever reason best known to her (or may be to you). But it is certainly not love as we (here in India) do understand.

We here in India have learnt over the years to make sacrifices for you love (the way Veer is doing). It has there from time immemorial right from the Vedic era till the modern India. If you love your parents, you sacrifice for them. Parents love their children-they can sacrifice anything for their welfare. There are millions of hot-headed husbands who have transformed themselves and foregone their ego for their wives. Just becasue they love their wives. Similalry there are several short-tempered arrogant women who have completely surrendered to their man. Not because to degrad themselves, but because they love them.

Here in India (unlike in Australia or West) we are taught to sacrifice in Love, not snatching. Like Ichha. She sacrificed everything for Tappu. Why? Becasue she loved her from the bottom of her heart. (Note: I am not a fan of Ichha, I am a big criticque of hers). But this is what true love is all about - giving not snatching.

Originally posted by: lambooo

I do not argue with you or enlighten you. But love as I understand is based on truth and truthfullness. If you deceive, tell lies, try to possess him/her through either force or compulsion, under no circumstances it can be termed as love. It can be termed as possession of somebody you desire. I think it stands true for Taps. She is trying to possess Veer for whatever reason best known to her (or may be to you). But it is certainly not love as we (here in India) do understand.

We here in India have learnt over the years to make sacrifices for you love (the way Veer is doing). It has there from time immemorial right from the Vedic era till the modern India. If you love your parents, you sacrifice for them. Parents love their children-they can sacrifice anything for their welfare. There are millions of hot-headed husbands who have transformed themselves and foregone their ego for their wives. Just becasue they love their wives. Similalry there are several short-tempered arrogant women who have completely surrendered to their man. Not because to degrad themselves, but because they love them.

Here in India (unlike in Australia or West) we are taught to sacrifice in Love, not snatching. Like Ichha. She sacrificed everything for Tappu. Why? Becasue she loved her from the bottom of her heart. (Note: I am not a fan of Ichha, I am a big criticque of hers). But this is what true love is all about - giving not snatching.

FYI ji i know love is sacrifice but thats much easier said than done! veer and ichha both sacrificed! except pain what did they get? and tapu and vansh's definition of love cannot be termed completely wrong! its just not our version of love! and yes ive often heard people changing in love...thats what I hoped would change tapu back last year...until i realised these foul cvs had absolutely no intention to let veer help her! see now in the story pratigya, krishna married her by force...is very rough and has a ghalat meaning of love but he is clean at heart and we know he loves pratigya very much! he is now changing in her love! also in bairi piya! thakur got amoli by forced marriage and by killing her husband but by changing for the good she has even started to fall for him. So why cant that happen with tapu? even in indian movies we've seen all this!

I have never seen a single episode of those serials, neither do i intend to. I am forced to watch Uttaran and Lado as my family watches these. Whatever the serials do portray. it is their domain. But the definition of love remains the same in Indian context- selfless sacrifice without getting any intention or wish to get something out of this. When a mother serves her children with food or breastfeed her baby she never thinks of getting anything out of that love. It is pure, undaunted and a will to only give, expect to get nothing in return. This is what we understand love is all about. The joy of giving, the joy of pleasing others.

Originally posted by: lambooo

I have never seen a single episode of those serials, neither do i intend to. I am forced to watch Uttaran and Lado as my family watches these. Whatever the serials do portray. it is their domain. But the definition of love remains the same in Indian context- selfless sacrifice without getting any intention or wish to get something out of this. When a mother serves her children with food or breastfeed her baby she never thinks of getting anything out of that love. It is pure, undaunted and a will to only give, expect to get nothing in return. This is what we understand love is all about. The joy of giving, the joy of pleasing others.

Brilliant comments Lambooji, I love all ur comments hats off 2 u, for revaling true facts.in every post u make....👏👍🏼

This topic has crossed certain limits of decency and last 5-6pages r only filled with argument/fights and personal attacks...