Section 306 - Page 4

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

nutmeg7

@nutmeg7

Achiever

+ 44

Posted: 15 years ago

#31

lamboo....sahi hai.....loved your thread....amazing
btw you mentioned arthur road jail....do you live in mumbai???

Quote

shivani9

@shivani9

Inactive

Posted: 15 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

shivani ji I know the rules of law! law serves to punish those who do harm to society YES and nor does it promote fraud and deception but law is fair and unbiased...unlike some people! and as a laawyer u cannot close loopholes in the law! Thats the job of the parliament and the courts! my job would be to bring out the truth! and make sure that people were served justice according to the rule of the law!

Tapasya is a criminal doing harm to the society and is worthy of punishment for all her crimes...this is what I have been saying as well. btw Parliamnet n courts are not machines...they are ppl with high intelligence n knowlege to safe guard the interests of the society, N if I,m not wrong there is no objection 2 anyone wanting to become members of Parliament N courts provided they are armoured with sound knowledge n ofcourse having no criminal records..

Edited by shivani109 - 15 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Sania

@SRKLuvr

Stunner

Posted: 15 years ago

#33

And whilst we are on the subject of the law I might add Lamboo ji that quoting ur second section...attempt to murder is what SID would be charged with as he had disengaged the pistol! TAPU would be charged with CONSPIRACY to commit murder...which would be much more difficult to prove considering that tapu can use many defences here...and her sentence would be greatly reduced...max to about 3 years!

Quote

Sania

@SRKLuvr

Stunner

Posted: 15 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: shivani109

Tapasya is a criminal doing harm to the society and is worthy of punishment for all her crimes...this is what I have been saying as well. btw Parliamnet n courts are not machines...they are ppl with high intelligence n knowlege to safe guard the interests of the society, N if I,m not wrong there is no objection 2 anyone wanting to become members of Parliament N courts provided they are armoured with sound knowledge n ofcourse having no criminal records..

u may say it cos u r blinded by hatred for her but I will follow what the legal principles are! maybe u might want to read some law books ji?😊 MPs dont just become MPs like that! If they are going to make our laws they have to be intelligent good people!

Quote

515955

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr
Sorry to tell u this lambooo ji but abettment of suicide comes tab naa when the person has a mens rea which means the INTENTION to induce suicide! There is NO WAY at least in a non-corrupt legal system like Australia's that any alleged crime can be taken to court without satisfying BOTH the mens rea principle and the actus reus principal! So look please dont teach law I have been studying it for years now! This is the very basic two things that need to be satisfied b4 it can be called a crime! She said a few things and he shot himself! NNow when she HAD no intention of making him shoot himself there where does the crime come from?

I pity on you. This is the recent Supreme Court ruling. ""In order to convict a person under Section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea (intention) to commit the offence, It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position that he committed suicide," _Justice Bhandari.

No if you say Tappu was not provoking Vansh by her taunt than what on the earth the meaning of provokation??? I can pity on you. Nothing more.

Quote

shivani9

@shivani9

Inactive

Posted: 15 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr
And whilst we are on the subject of the law I might add Lamboo ji that quoting ur second section...attempt to murder is what SID would be charged with as he had disengaged the pistol! TAPU would be charged with CONSPIRACY to commit murder...which would be much more difficult to prove considering that tapu can use many defences here...and her sentence would be greatly reduced...max to about 3 years!

Darling UR confused n mixing up two cases.I guess courts deal with one case at a time..thts my common sense, I find u always deviate from the topic, ths not good practice is it???? we are purely discussing Tapasya as criminal not Sid or anyone else..

Quote

nutmeg7

@nutmeg7

Achiever

+ 44

Posted: 15 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: shivani109

Darling UR confused n mixing up two cases.I guess courts deal with one case at a time..thts my common sense, I find u always deviate from the topic, ths not good practice is it???? we are purely discussing Tapasya as criminal not Sid or anyone else..

oh ho...it seems that srk has yet to learn the fine nuances of law...

Quote

shivani9

@shivani9

Inactive

Posted: 15 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

u may say it cos u r blinded by hatred for her but I will follow what the legal principles are! maybe u might want to read some law books ji?😊 MPs dont just become MPs like that! If they are going to make our laws they have to be intelligent good people!

UR honour I wish to correct ur statement, i AM NOT BLINDED BY HATRED, I,M BLINDED BY TRUTH..btw..MPS SHUD BE KNOWLEDABLE, is what i have written above, plz dont teach me what I know....darling..😆..