Originally posted by: SRKLuvr
well i wouldnt know about those cases ji becuse I live in Australia and I follow the legal system from here! But frankly most laws would be the same generally! At least the two things needed to make a case...mens rea and actus reus are the same as is the difference between conspiracy and attempt and the fraud laws! as well as the others ive mentioned!😊
You do not have to be Ram Jehamalini or Harish Salve to conclude that Tappu has a criminal mind and her acts are criminal acts by even the liberal point of view.
1. I know she cannot be booked under Attempt to Murder. But certainly she can be booked and tried being a conspirator to murder somebody. A criminal act punishable by law.
2. If you so strongly argue that she has not abetted his suicide certainly her acts come under homicide, not amounting to murder. Again a criminal act, punishable by law.
3. Befauding the marriage. Again an act punishable by law.
So do not try to justify that she is an innocent person...an does not have any intention of doing crimes.
Remember when she cried on the bed after Ichha was hospitalised. She promised to herself.
"Buri tarah phans gaye hum." And perhaps for the first and only time she prayed to God, "Is bar bacha lo hamey, phir aise galti nahin karenge hum" And when she was let off the hook by Ichha the victim what did she do? Sensing an opportunity to ruin her life she played every conspiracy to perfection to ensure that she get married her to an addict. And... oh my God..
I even feel shame to say this....she clarified Jogi "Papa hamey biswas karo....is shaadi ke barey mein humein kuch nahi maloom" to which Jogi told aptly, " Beti yeh biswas karne ki nahin hey, yeh kisi ki zindegi ki sawal hein". So if you say that these are not the acts of a criminal mind so what else could be? And if you are defending by saying that she is not a criminal or criminal bent of mind, I must say that you will be the best lawyer around to defend criminals and criminal minds.