The Parth Bombshell - Page 4

Originally posted by: Sudipta_Sen

nandini not need to surrogacy or treatment for being pregnant....because in this season karan & Nandini are quite young...Mihir is 60 years so karan is 38 years & nandini may be is 35 or36 years....her daughter sameera is 14 or 15 years old...so when nandini gave birth to sameera then nandini's age is 22 or 23. But the biggest question is HOW THIS TANYA THING HAPPENED IN KARAN"S"s LIFE???...BECAUSE SEVERAL TIME KARAN & NANDINI MENTIONED THAT THEY SHIFTED USA IN VERY YOUNG AGE...& THEIR CHILDREN BRON & BROUGHT UP IN USA....THAT'S WHY NANDINI WANTS THEM TO BACK IN SHANTINIKETAN FOR TEACHING SANSKAR. & in this season bhoomi was not happened....plus karan nandini mentioned that they shifted USA in very young age & gave birth to their children there & remain in USA for 17/18 years....then how tanya was connected to karan nandini when they even not in India for years????...how she became parth's mother??? & parth was love nishani of karan nandini from s1...then how suddely tanya became parth"s mother in s2. These creative team & writers are hopeless....they should research well before writing....karan's dialogue is biggest blooper of this season 2

Karan cannot be 38… that is the issue. Karan is younger than Gautam and technically even Gautam can’t be older than 37. Mihir Tulsi are shown as being married for 38 years.

Karan can be 36 but they are showing that Parth is already an adult and at least 18… which means Karan became his father at 18 himself regardless of the fact that they changed his biological mother. Everything is messed up because of the timeline.

Mihir Tulsi should have been shown celebrating 50 years of marriage at least then the timeline makes sense. Karan can be 47/8 and be shown as father of an 18-20 year old without anyone getting a headache.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Karan cannot be 38… that is the issue. Karan is younger than Gautam and technically even Gautam can’t be older than 37. Mihir Tulsi are shown as being married for 38 years.

Karan can be 36 but they are showing that Parth is already an adult and at least 18… which means Karan became his father at 18 himself regardless of the fact that they changed his biological mother. Everything is messed up because of the timeline.

Mihir Tulsi should have been shown celebrating 50 years of marriage at least then the timeline makes sense. Karan can be 47/8 and be shown as father of an 18-20 year old without anyone getting a headache.

Originally posted by: Sudipta_Sen

Look these makers don't have enough brain for age calculation or math calculation....they can shows us anything illogical in the name of fictional show. The main question is not about karan's age...the question is how tanya connected to karan or nandini....because in the show they already introduced karan nandini as NRI couple....who lived in USA for years...karan nandini mentioned that they shifted USA in very young age...even their children bron & brought up there.....then how tanya come in the picture when karan nandini are not even in India.... also there is no mention of bhoomi in this season....then how tanya linked with karan...bhoomi was the reason for karan's remarriage with tanya s1...but here is no bhoomi... I think karan's dialogue was the biggest blooper of this season...perhaps further they will not mentioned tanya's name....to glorified tulsi & Nandini's parvarish...& in the context of pari's parvarish they just add the dialogue........or they can show that tanya is nandini karan's very close friend....she & her husband died in accident...so karan nandini adopt their child...& perhaps karan nandini already lost their first child parth ...so they named Tanya's child as parth...

Those questions have been raised but unfortunately not answered yet. They have changed things that are completely unrelated to the original season and provided no explanations so far. If Tanya appears onscreen eventually or in case she’s revealed to be dead but the truth about Parth’s biological mother comes out somehow, we might find out their half-arsed weird explanation as to how did Karan end up with Tanya having his kid while Nandini ends up raising him.

What a logicless show, suppose Tulsi had her first child Guatam at her age 18, when Guatam was 5 and Tulsi was 23 they fast forwarded story by 20yrs when Gomzi and Shobha were going to college. So that time Gutam was 25, Tulsi was 42.

Then they introduced Priyanka(she became Mandira later) who kidnaped Tulsi and Tulsi went missing and lost her memory for 5yrs. By this time Tulsi was 47.

Then after some time Nandini went to jail when she was pregnant they forwarded story again by 20yrs when they introduced Bhumi, Laksh, KT. So Parth suppose to be at least 19 when Baa died and Tulsi suppose to be 67.

Then after Baa's death they fast forwarded story by 5yrs again showing 1 adopted girl Sugandhi somehow she is the same actress who played Sanchi (Nakul's girlfriend), they shown Mihir had alzimer, now Tulsi was 73.

Season 2 launched as 25yrs fast forward now Tulsi suppose to be 98yr old and Mihir at least 100yrs old 🤣 think about Gayatri nd Daksha they should be at least 116yrs old

I didn't even considered years story was going on without fast forward.

1. Now in Baa's letter how come they are showing Parth as small kid, he is supposed to be at least 19 that time?

2. Why they are mentioning that Tulsi used to tell Parth stories of Baa?

3. They have fast forwarded story 20yrs + 5yrs + 20yrs + 5yrs + 25yrs = 75yrs then how come Tulsi celebration 38 wedding anniversary? It is supposed to be at least 80th anniversary.

4. Why they introduced Pari, when there was already Pari, Shoba's daughter they were showing her along with Archita, Lakshya and Eklavya. Do they have short of names?

5. There was already Sugandhi, a adopted girl already then why Tulsi, Mihir adopt 3more children? They should have shown children of Laksha, Bhumi, Ekalavya, Nakul, Manthan, Mayank, etc

In season 1 they were showing 2 girls sawari babwri, daughters of chirag, but somehow after 40yrs they shown son of chirag af teenage. 🤣 Sometimes they show Kiran as elder brother sometimes Mihir. Sometimes they show Guatam as elder to Karan sometimes Karan elder brother 🤣

Seriously, writers are on drugs for sure, now a days you can't fool audience, in this era people watch series full of realistic suspense. People find logic in everything.

Glad to see someone else also getting a migraine from this season’s timeline being all sorts of wrong and weird.

They could’ve just picked up the show from where it ended but they wanted to show a crazy, delulu, single woman obsessed with Mihir, AGAIN; because 3 times wasn’t enough… and it would’ve been impossible to sell it if Mihir was declining mentally, unsure of even his own name… ergo this nonsense.

Because god forbid if they could have just shown Tulsi having to be the strong matriarch keeping the family together, guiding her children and especially her Bahus now through their own journeys with their Bahus all the while as she watches the man who is the love of her life, the one who made her a part of this family and with whom she later went on to take the legacy of the Viranis forward fading away as she can’t do anything but watch him lose even his own mind. All she can do is love him and look after him until she bids him farewell one day.

I watched a show called Queen Charlotte recently, a spinoff of Bridgerton; inspired by the true story of Queen Charlotte and King George. It’s fictionalised obviously, they have made Britain lose their racism some 200 years before present day… and while that’s obviously far from reality even today, what kept the audience hooked was the storytelling and performances.

The last episode and in particular the last scene of the show is guaranteed to make you weep and it is literally based on this premise. An all powerful queen struggling to keep her lineage from dying out as she watches her husband decline mentally.

The real King and Queen faced similar situations and she was absolutely devoted to him and unfortunately passed away a year or two before he did and he didn’t even have the wherewithal to understand the loss.

I think that would’ve been a fantastic ode to Tulsi and also highlighted an oft ignored subject- caregiver fatigue and depression.

But alas…