Not taken out of context at all
He says "the future must not belong those who 'target' coptic christains, women etc which is great but next he doesn't say those who target Muslims instead he says those who slander the Prophet of Islam
Okay, then does he say the future does not belong to those who desecrate Jesus pics, holocaust deniers etc? No, he only says that that should be condemned too
And of course he has the right to say it, the way he wanted to say it
I was only giving him credit that his words came true 👍🏼
The context of speech is almost entirely opposite of what is being attempted to be portrayed. I am just adding context with verbatim quotes. People can make their own conclusions as they deem fit. 
Cities in North Africa and the Middle East recently experienced violent protests in response to an anti-Islamic video produced in the state of California by a US citizen. In the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi, the US ambassador to the country, Christopher Stevens, and three other diplomats were killed, and others injured or killed, when suspected Libyan religious extremists stormed the US Consulate there.
The film has drawn widespread condemnation around the world, including from UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
“On this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence,” President Obama said, calling the video “crude and disgusting,” but explaining how such hateful comment is allowed by the freedom of speech clause in the US constitution.
“There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy. There is no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan,” he added, referring to the attacks that killed Ambassador Stevens and caused deaths elsewhere.
Hindi TV Shows
Anupamaa
17