What accounts for the success of the Baaghi franchise? - Page 2

Originally posted by: pali001

same reasons Dhoom series work .

Dhoom 3 was cringe fest acting , pointless presence and hardly any plot . I could not beyond 1 hr ...was it not HGOY ?

Dhoom 3 was still much better than Baaghi series, people went to watch it because of Aamir and the earlier two Dhoom films, and most people hated it, but still it was sleek and stylish.

Baaghi lacks even that stylish edge, it's unadulterated cringe. The action sequences are completely the glue that holds the film together. And those are so raw, so...elemental.

Originally posted by: heartbleed

The story. The script. As they say, the content is the king now.

If anything the success proves content is not king

Mainly action even though its badly done. Why can't we get John wick kind of realistic fight scenes. Tiger literally has one usp and these filmmakers can't even present that properly. With better action director dude can actually pull of fancy fight sequences.

Originally posted by: heartbleed

oh ok.. i am sorry 😔

You didn’t get it

Films have were accepted. As oppose to others 😆😆

Tiger didn’t even have to dress up like a ninja turtle 🤣