Originally posted by: Salutethearmy
I have few more questions.
1. shaurya is Akshara's real brother or just some distant cousin
Shaurya is very much Akshara's own brother and vishambars son. I don't know why he is just a mere prop in this show.
2. This Varsha and Shaurya were part of the original YRKKH or it was Sneha ?
Yes. It might be hard to believe now, but the original YRKKH has beautiful side tracks dedicated to the other couples be it varsha-shaurya of mohit-nandini. It was not always about Naitik Akshara.
Varsha was Akshara's best friend and Shaurya was Akshara's brother and they fell in love. :)
The actor has changed for Shaurya. It was someone else earlier. Varsha and Shaurya also have a daughter - Ananya - she is the eldest of the cousins - naksh, naira and kuhu.
Sneha was naitik's employee - she was in love with Naitik and then moved away. She wasn't shown after that track. Even in the track about kuhu's parentage, Sneha was never shown. She was shown to be dead.
3. Any tracks dedicated to Kuhu or no ?
In the original? There was a phase where Naitik flew to Thailand or was it bangkok? To take care of kuhu. He knew everything about kuhu and Shaurya being the father, but he chose to take care of kuhu until Shaurya was ready - and that included not telling Akshara the truth too. The truth finally did come out and Shaurya confessed to the family about kuhu being his and Sneha's child.
4. Mishti's mom never came back to see her as a kid in YRKKH ?
Karishma was a nitpicking mother - the last we saw of Karishma was when namans misdeeds were revealed and she broke her relationship with him.
5. The story of Akshara and Natik was done with and totally changed for Kaira ?
They took a generation leap and tried to focus on nakshs love story and then the leads left one after the other and the focus shifted to kaira.
6. Like the topic maker's post it looks like Mishbir do not look as if they will have major differences, though in their own way stick to what they want to do. The crossing of paths is not between but others. i do not know about Akshara and Natik but Kaira, were they on the opposite side of the fence.
Naitik and Akshara's MUs were always true to characters and they stemmed from the characters and not just for the sake of drama. Kaira with the divorce drama I didn't like it much and now Kartik accusing naira of a one night stand is too much to take and SO NOT KARTIK - the same man who vociferously stood beside his wife when everyone thought she had an abortion and wasn't 'pure' - it was such joy to see him say SO WHAT IF SHE HAD AN ABORTION IN THE PAST? that's the kind of husband they portrayed him to be, and now for the sake of drama they completely changed his character and that's too much to digest.
If i bring Shaheer's previous KRPKAB or for that matter any daily soap, these days MU is part and parcel of the story line.
True. That's why I said if MU stems from the characters and circumstances then it's ok otherwise it's drama just for the sake of drama.
They have made Mishbir's bonding so precious that if one of go astray , it will change the characterisation. This is common in almost all shows but does RS go for a typical MU type situation.
Yes. It would be a pain to watch them destroy the characters. But they can still bring in MUs - especially with Abir's father - maybe Mishti can understand meenus stand and take her side and Abir isn't going to like it something like that - true to characters.
Change within limits, okay but I do not want Abir Rajvansh to be another Anurag Basu !!!