Originally posted by: Polki_Zofi
Adoption is good, but I personally feel it can never replace own flesh and blood in hands😊.
It is simply a very noble thing, but you need to be noble aswell to do it. So first question which need to be answered is: "Are you noble enough to carry out this great responsibility in future, under any circumstance?".
Adopted child might never really feel like own child... sometimes they will search for their own parent. It is not right to think only from the adopter's perspective, but also for the perspective of the adopted child.
There are many things which can occur 😊 ... noble deeds don't come so easy.
I personally think that it should be a step taken with great caution and self assessment. How much attached you can be is not the issue - but how much responsible but at the same time "how much detached" you can be?😊
Own child equation and adopted child cannot be the same. Simply, in my view 😆😃😊.
I believe in charity and giving service. I had worked as a Catholic girl's group member in my teen years in Poland ... was trained with elderly and orphans ... but was chosen to nurse elderly as it is more tricky and needs patience. But orphans have a whole set of different variables.
Many things to talk about. But in no way it is wrong ... it is just "very big" ... far bigger than mere desires and thoughts 😊.
Zofi😃🤗
Been so long honey.
@bolded blue. very good point. glad you brought it up.
I feel exactly the same. Adoption vs. surrogacy is a very subjective choice. quite often latter is better solution and more desired solution. yet people shy away from it.
In fact this is a constant bone of contention between me and my older sis.
both of us look at this very emotionally yet practically😆 but always end up with different conclusions.
my sis believes that if you cannot have a child naturally then you should adopt
I believe that if I cannot have a child then my first option should be fertility or surrogacy and lastly adoption. In fact there are many others who feel the same way as me. We have nothing against orphan children and would very much like to help them (through means other than adoption) but being true to one's self have to admit that given the option i.e. even surrogacy, I would get an opportunity to see myself and my husband's personality traits in that child, which would never happen with adoption. It does not sound politically correct but it is a natural honest feeling. I want to have my partner's offspring not just any child. I would have no problem acting as a foster parent though to help orphaned children.
my sister though argues the other side - she says that when there are so many orphaned children out there it is selfish to think of options like surrogacy - to which I say that using that argument - until all orphaned children are are adopted even thinking of having natural children is selfish na?😆😆😆 my sister is more extreme in her passion on this issue I must admit but the argument still holds.
Quite often people make adoption the more moral aternative and this moral argument (coupled with other reasons) dissuades people from considering options like surrogacy or fertility. I think this is not right. morality is important but there is no harm in being a little self serving if it is not malicious or damaging to others na?
Varsha had an abortion and as a result of some resultant damage cannot concieve. this could mean that she has damaged her uterus or her cervix not necessarily her ovaries. She could still have her own child through surrogacy but as she is hesitant to take Bhavna's suggestion to go to the doctor she will never know now will she?