Isn't it a crime?

404_NotFound

@404_NotFound

Sparkler

33

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Whatever happened was between husband and wife .When you become a parent you need to keep aside your differences for the child's well being .By not revealing she wronged both her ex husband and her daughter.I don't see anything other than Ego here

No reason will justify Sonakshi's decision of keeping the child away from Dev but again she is Sonakshi Bose who can never be wrong .Her every action will be justified .

Let's see if the makers have the guts to show Miss Sonakshi Bose was wrong .

3

Reply

Quote

noor.21

@noor.21

Explorer

7

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: dlavanya
See it is very simple ... according to sona and even according to dev himself ... he is the one who threw them out of house.. given that dev admitted that he did it and given his history .. it is an easy guess what dev dixit is capable of .. he already asked her to get out and all those harah words.. so for sona it would be a big risk to tell dev - what is the gaurantee that he will not just snatch the kid from her given that they are powerful and have money and sona had literally nothing...

But now that she is wealthy enough to fight for her daughter , she is not scared anymore.. also she waited for 7 yrs mainly as she probably wanted to get legally divorced( i think 7 yrs of separation leads to divorce automatically - lawyers can confirm) and divorce will kick in the prenup as well which clearly states that dixits do not want the kid.. so sona is in better position and can fight for her kid if needed...

If i was in sona's situation- i would have done exactly same thing.. given that we know what dev dixit is capable of when his mother wishes for something..

But one day the truth will come out.

Also isn't Sona all about doing the right thing, not the safe thing.

Also I thought it was super stupid that both Dev and Sona believed that Dev threw them out. Because we all know from the past records that Dev is capable of doing alot of thing to people around Sona but nothing to Sona directly.

1

Reply

Quote

pkbdas61

@pkbdas61

Dazzler

20

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

Maybe Shaheer, as the lawyer, is the legal advisor too to the PH..😊😊

what crime? first let there be a case and then the court will decide if there is a crime..

but right now, in a lighter vein, now that Erica has been forcibly been made a mother, i won't be surprised if Shaheer will be closely watching her..and how she handles kids.. and if he is satisfied, he may actually pop the question to her.. 😊😊. After all shows can be good training grounds too..

8

Reply

Quote

pkbdas61

@pkbdas61

Dazzler

20

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: dlavanya
See it is very simple ... according to sona and even according to dev himself ... he is the one who threw them out of house.. given that dev admitted that he did it and given his history .. it is an easy guess what dev dixit is capable of .. he already asked her to get out and all those harah words.. so for sona it would be a big risk to tell dev - what is the gaurantee that he will not just snatch the kid from her given that they are powerful and have money and sona had literally nothing...

But now that she is wealthy enough to fight for her daughter , she is not scared anymore.. also she waited for 7 yrs mainly as she probably wanted to get legally divorced( i think 7 yrs of separation leads to divorce automatically - lawyers can confirm) and divorce will kick in the prenup as well which clearly states that dixits do not want the kid.. so sona is in better position and can fight for her kid if needed...

If i was in sona's situation- i would have done exactly same thing.. given that we know what dev dixit is capable of when his mother wishes for something..

👏

Reply

Quote

sproutbean8

@sproutbean8

Beginner

1

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: noor.21
Whatever he said to Sona was between him and Sona. So as result of that, she decided not to be with him. fair enough. Both have decided to go separate ways.
But even in a divorce, it is the duty of the partners to inform each other about something like this.

Isn't the Bose family always about doing the "right thing"?

There are ppl who may their wife and husband, but a child is altogether a separate entity.

Even in cases of extremely messed up divorce, the parents are at least allowed vistation rights in india. Unless it is proven that the parent is brutal to the child.

Thank you for bringing this up! I completely agree and was hoping the makers would have gone in the direction of letting Dev watch his kid grow up and be a part of her life. Sona herself said that Dev was a good person, so why not let him be a part of the child's life. If the Dixits had come for the kid the prenup would have negated their rights.

I thought the prenup would have been used to protect Sona but it looks like the makers are going to take the cliqued way out.

The one thing about Dev and Sona I had hoped that the makers would have kept was their ability to talk to each other after an argument. I think Sona could have dictated the terms by which Dev was to meet his kid , ie Ishwari is not allowed to know about her.

I give up, I feel cheated...

Reply

Quote

HGranger

@HGranger

Beginner

1

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

i don't think its a crime according to law. moreover, dev wasn't expecting or suspecting it either. so he doesn't know what he's missing.

what is a crime though is radha rani switching elena's contraception pills to ensure that she gets pregnant. also why is elena so unfazed ? did she severe her ties with the boses too ? if it is so then how does she live with herself ??

3

Reply

Quote

HGranger

@HGranger

Beginner

1

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

/QUOTE]

Thank you for bringing this up! I completely agree and was hoping the makers would have gone in the direction of letting Dev watch his kid grow up and be a part of her life. Sona herself said that Dev was a good person, so why not let him be a part of the child's life. If the Dixits had come for the kid the prenup would have negated their rights.

I thought the prenup would have been used to protect Sona but it looks like the makers are going to take the cliqued way out.

The one thing about Dev and Sona I had hoped that the makers would have kept was their ability to talk to each other after an argument. I think Sona could have dictated the terms by which Dev was to meet his kid , ie Ishwari is not allowed to know about her.

I give up, I feel cheated...

i too feel betrayed tbh. but what we're expecting, intracies of law used to drive the plot is way too advanced for our country. our soap operas are 10 years behind time

3

Reply

Quote

Kaustuv

@Kaustuv

Navigator

12

Posted: 8 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: rahulvats12

Lol...do u know even, that word used by dev for sona...how it started all...I don't think u think so...
U Just remember his word during episode but how it started and why...u will never understand.

Yes actually even in my real life I do not have patience to understand the hidden intent whatsoever ever. The person is rude to me plain and simple . I don't use my brain to analyze why, how . I utilize my brain constructively.

Edited by Kaustuv - 8 years ago

1

Reply

Quote

gmgi

@gmgi

Rocker

26

Posted: 8 years ago

#19

@ TM both the Bose family and Dev doesn't have the luxury of knowing what we know as viewers. For them Dev is someone1) who was vindictive enough to throw the whole family out making use of the mortgage that they did to pay him for the lump sum amount paid by him to Saurab behind their back. He agreed that he signed the papers.2) The prenup which he was so against before marriage came before them with his signature with the child clause. So the Boses who were thrown out of their own home and that too at night despite the Dixits themselves having gone through the same circumstances would have thought the worst of them. By the time they were aware about the pregnancy what all have happened we are not aware of.

1

Reply

Quote

Kaustuv

@Kaustuv

Navigator

12

Posted: 8 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: noor.21
Whatever he said to Sona was between him and Sona. So as result of that, she decided not to be with him. fair enough. Both have decided to go separate ways.
But even in a divorce, it is the duty of the partners to inform each other about something like this.

Isn't the Bose family always about doing the "right thing"?

There are ppl who may their wife and husband, but a child is altogether a separate entity.

Even in cases of extremely messed up divorce, the parents are at least allowed vistation rights in india. Unless it is proven that the parent is brutal to the child.

R we forgetting the terms n condition of signed prenup. According to which if Sona has a child after divorce she has to raise it on her own. She cannot ask Dev for anything.

4

Reply

Quote

Isn't it a crime? - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics