The biggest difference between Ruhi and Armaan - Page 6

Wow, I love the excuses that Armaan gets. What punishments did Armaan get for his behaviour? His toxic family is not his punishment, but something he inherited and he could have cut it out earlier. So Ruhi needs to face half of what Armaan did for Armaan not being punished for his crime. By your point, it seems suffering emotional damage from family/ 'punished by family' for his earlier actions according as per your perspective can supersede the fact that he committed a crime and he needs to be punished for it.

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

No. I am not going to join you anything, because I unlike you can differentiate between a character who does get a leeway and one who does not

As, I said Let Ruhi face half of all that Armaan has faced. We will talk.

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Wow, I love the excuses that Armaan gets. What punishments did Armaan get for his behaviour? His toxic family is not his punishment, but something he inherited and he could have cut it out earlier. So Ruhi needs to face half of what Armaan did for Armaan not being punished for his crime. By your point, it seems suffering emotional damage from family/ 'punished by family' for his earlier actions according to your perspectives can supersede the fact that he needs to be punished for crime.

I didn't even mention his "toxic family". That s what you are saying. As I said you are seeing what you want to see.

I can say the same back to you. You can't acknowledge his crime and the fact that he committed this crime even after 'repenting for his past mistakes'. My point was always that Armaan and Ruhi are at the same level and both do things for their own selfishness and hurt others. And they have never stopped. Both even commit crimes . The only difference is that one says sorry, one is unapologetic. But if a simple sorry can cover up a crime, then all criminals who say sorry and show remorse should not go to jail. If Ruhi is considering being given a leeway for not being punished for her actions, Armaan would also have been considered to be given a leeway by not going to jail/ portrayed as negative due to his actions.

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

I didn't even mention his "toxic family". That s what you are saying. As I said you are seeing what you want to see.

The biggest difference is: Ruhi is evil who purposely plots devious plans to hurt Abhira while Arman hurts others many a times because of his stupidity but never intentionally.

*edited by Moderator*

@bold- as far as armaan is concerned, he was never a positive character eventhough he has received best pati award from star plus 🤣

Armaan has always been selfish who was leading his bhabhi on when his innocent brother knew nothing and when his brother was presumed dead, he was almost going to get married to ruhi. If abhira wouldn't have revealed her feelings, he would have happily married and been ruhi ka doosra pati.

I for one can't forget how he removed abhira's mangalsutra and humiliated her in front of the family and made her roam the streets. But people have short term memory issues.

Even after getting married the second time, he maintained his distance with abhira cos of Vidya.

This serial will most probably follow the path of ghum 1 where Rohit will die and armaan will grab the infant and give him to his achchi sachchi dost and desert abhira.

Armaan doesn't care about anyone except his own guilt and selfishness. He is the main villain in this show but then fanboys won't listen to you and keep insulting you with choicest of words for having a different perspective bout their favourite.

A mother(even if it's ruhi) shouldn't be separated from her child but this show will reverse all concepts just to justify the best pati and people here will go gaga just cos Rohit purohit is handsome 😂

If ruhi's child would have been aborted and armaan would have given his child to Rohit and ruhi then people would have changed their tune accordingly. It's just hypocrisy when child stealing is justified just cos the mother of the child is a negative character.

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Okay, I am reading through some threads but not all. If it is, I disagree with them and if anyone mentions as such in my thread, I will call them out.

Yes, I expect more from Armaan as the ML. He is supposed to be positive. When he commits crimes and is still supposed to be a positive character, I will call it out.

I used the scenario to point out how the narratives change according to the character. I don't get your last point. When did I say that I want Abhira to be in coma and Ruhi to be the mother of her child? Please show me that. If the scenario was reversed, I will be bashing Ruhi instead. If they are some people who wished for that, go take it up with them. Children should stay with their mothers. My point is if Ruhi did what Armaan did, she would have been instantly called a criminal and asked to be sent to jail.

Originally posted by: Natashaspeaks

People here treat characters as gods and insult real people to justify their toxic choices, so please don't need to take their talks to heart. They are immature fanboys.

@bold- as far as armaan is concerned, he was never a positive character eventhough he has received best pati award from star plus 🤣

Armaan has always been selfish who was leading his bhabhi on when his innocent brother knew nothing and when his brother was presumed dead, he was almost going to get married to ruhi. If abhira wouldn't have revealed her feelings, he would have happily married and been ruhi ka doosra pati.

I for one can't forget how he removed abhira's mangalsutra and humiliated her in front of the family and made her roam the streets. But people have short term memory issues.

Even after getting married the second time, he maintained his distance with abhira cos of Vidya.

This serial will most probably follow the path of ghum 1 where Rohit will die and armaan will grab the infant and give him to his achchi sachchi dost and desert abhira.

Armaan doesn't care about anyone except his own guilt and selfishness. He is the main villain in this show but then fanboys won't listen to you and keep insulting you with choicest of words for having a different perspective bout their favourite.

A mother(even if it's ruhi) shouldn't be separated from her child but this show will reverse all concepts just to justify the best pati and people here will go gaga just cos Rohit purohit is handsome 😂

If ruhi's child would have been aborted and armaan would have given his child to Rohit and ruhi then people would have changed their tune accordingly. It's just hypocrisy when child stealing is justified just cos the mother of the child is a negative character.

When we don't have any valid points we will resort to personal attack sure.

Ruhi is stupid vile woman who hates small baby even after losing it(based in what was shown in show). Forget Armaan she is not comparable to anyone. Such disgusting characters with so much toxicity are rare and she is one of them. zero sympathy for her.

So intentions can over-ride the fact that a crime was committed? Didn't he intentionally kidnap the baby along with Rohit? Didn't he intentionally hide the truth from Abhira and Ruhi and cheat them? The underlying problem is his stupidity but some of his actions were definitely intentional, including his crime.

Originally posted by: Lostin90s

The biggest difference is: Ruhi is evil who purposely plots devious plans to hurt Abhira while Arman hurts others many a times because of his stupidity but never intentionally.

Yes Ruhi is vile. But is Armaan not equally vile keeping a baby away from his mother? Not vile for cheating both Ruhi and Abhira? Ruhi's vileness is more outright while Armaan's is more implicit. And Armaan dropped to the same level as Ruhi with this track.

Originally posted by: PeacefulLove

Ruhi is stupid vile woman who hates small baby even after losing it(based in what was shown in show). Forget Armaan she is not comparable to anyone. Such disgusting characters with so much toxicity are rare and she is one of them. zero sympathy for her.

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Yes Ruhi is vile. But is Armaan not equally vile keeping a baby away from his mother? Not vile for cheating both Ruhi and Abhira? Ruhi's vileness is more outright while Armaan's is more implicit. And Armaan dropped to the same level as Ruhi with this track.

Yeah if Armaan would have really kidnapped the baby I would have said so. Roohis pati Rohit literally forced him to take. That doesn't make Armaan saint but not vile too. He is wrong no doubt and should speak up. I don't support him either but with Rohit in picture it doesn't make him look vile. Rohit is half parent of that kid who took that call and thinking about his wife Abhira (who says I would have died if something would have happened to BSP) his intentions are not cruel.