Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest
Ruhi is wrong and no one is denying that. Her deeds should come out, but it is too late because Mahaan Abhimaan kept quiet earlier. Even if it comes out now, on what moral grounds can the Poddar family, Armaan or Rohit scold her when Armaan and Rohit committed the bigger crime of kidnapping a baby? Both of them are immoral as well.
I noticed you used the word 'punishment' for Armaan and 'jail' for Ruhi. Shouldn't both to jail being criminals? Why the double standards?
They are already justifying Armaan's mistakes. Why turn Ruhi more vile? If turning another character evil after one's of Ruhi's kaands is considering whitewashing Ruhi, why isn't turning Ruhi more evil after Armaan's crime not considered whitewashing Armaan? What is the point of 'realising mistakes' when one keeps making the same mistakes and hurting people again? He is a total hypocrite- apologies don't make anything right; you need to show remorse and fix the situation. Armaan is not making the situations better, only worsening them with his stupidity. If he doesn't go to jail in this track, what is the difference between the writers' approach to him and Ruhi? Both are criminals who didn't go to jail.
@Bold Underlined - Crime is a crime ! When you are so particular abt sending criminals to jail then Ruhi shld be the first to go considering her evil acts started from before.
@Bold - I mentioned punishment in my first post and then you mentioned abt Armaan and Rohit being jailed and so I said Ruhi had to be jailed for her previous kaands.
@Italicized - Difference is Armaan being called out for his wrong doings by everyone(characters) openly and Ruhi's vileness is always kept under wraps and she being treated as one acchi sachi insaan.
I have mentioned before, Armaan is wrong and he will get his due for it. Ruhi also should get it was my whole point. Please try and comprehend my reply rather than quoting as double standards.
3