The biggest difference between Ruhi and Armaan - Page 5

Who is calling Ruhi mature? She is being labelled a vamp? And who is justifying her actions? She is a vamp so the expectations from her are as such. But Armaan is the supposed ML, but is shown committing a crime. But some Abhimaan fans cannot accept Armaan being labelled as a kidnapper and criminal. They can't accept that the law applies to Armaan. I even saw responses that Rohit forced the baby on him.

I love the changing of narratives for convenience too. If Ruhi was in Armaan's place, she will be labelled as a criminal and there will be calls for her to be sent to jail . But since it's Armaan, he is innocent and will repent for his crimes by 'saying sorry'.

Originally posted by: Drna7

If Ruhi is vamp and people like her because she's entertaining then why justify her every action? Accept her wrongs and move on.

But here she's treated like goddess who can never di anything wrong and for her every action only trauma, other characters or writer are responsible.

When Ruhi does mistakes she hailed as vamp and whatever she's doing is normal from vamp's perspective. Otherwise she's a forever achhi, sachhi, mature, bechari ladki.🙆🏻‍♀️

Changing of narratives for convenience getting funnier nowadays.

Ruhi was led on by Armaan and in terms of that she is a victim. But people also called her out for cheating Rohit and that's when the perception of her as a vamp started. And if fact, her cheating Rohit made her lose all sympathy she gained for being led on by Armaan.

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

Exactly. Rumaal vale kaand main bhi saara blame Armaan pe daal diya tha and Ruhi was presented victim.

Why will anyone root for a character Jo sab galtiyaan karke bhi nikal jaati haa?

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Who is calling Ruhi mature? She is being labelled a vamp? And who is justifying her actions? She is a vamp so the expectations from her are as such. But Armaan is the supposed ML, but is shown committing a crime. But some Abhimaan fans cannot accept Armaan being labelled as a kidnapper and criminal. They can't accept that the law applies to Armaan. I even saw responses that Rohit forced the baby on him.

I love the changing of narratives for convenience too. If Ruhi was in Armaan's place, she will be labelled as a criminal and there will be calls for her to be sent to jail . But since it's Armaan, he is innocent and will repent for his crimes by 'saying sorry'.

Oh. Armaan will definitely have to do more than just "saying sorry". The show has never brushed his mistakes under the carpet. Like they keep doing for Ruhi

Literally nobody here called Armaan "innocent"

It's just you twisting people s words to project that Armaan s mistakes has supporters when reality is nobody is supporting this baby swap

Will he and Rohit go to jail? If Abhira going to divorce him? In the real world, no one would want a husband who played with her feelings and committed a crime. If not, he is considered to be getting away scot-free. He is getting the same leeway Ruhi is getting.

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

Oh. Armaan will definitely have to do more than just "saying sorry".

I don't think Ruhi has ever apologise to anybody.

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Will he and Rohit go to jail? If Abhira going to divorce him? In the real world, no one would want a husband who played with her feelings and committed a crime. If not, he is considered to be getting away scot-free. He is getting the same leeway Ruhi is getting.

No. Armaan never gets leeway that Ruhi does. But I guess you are just going to see what you want to see. So let agree to disagree.

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Who is calling Ruhi mature? She is being labelled a vamp? And who is justifying her actions? She is a vamp so the expectations from her are as such. But Armaan is the supposed ML, but is shown committing a crime. But some Abhimaan fans cannot accept Armaan being labelled as a kidnapper and criminal. They can't accept that the law applies to Armaan. I even saw responses that Rohit forced the baby on him.

I love the changing of narratives for convenience too. If Ruhi was in Armaan's place, she will be labelled as a criminal and there will be calls for her to be sent to jail . But since it's Armaan, he is innocent and will repent for his crimes by 'saying sorry'.

@bold - You really have to check out other threads if you think this.

@ul - firse Armaan beech mein aa gaya??

Why talk about something that didn't happened? But as you said it yourself then it's same as people wanted Ab in coma and Ru to be mother of child. In that case they would have loved it but not now

Okay, let's see the future tracks. If Abhira doesn't divorce him for this and Armaan and Rohit don't go to jail, I hope you join me in requesting the writers to stop giving both Armaan and Ruhi leeway and send both to jail like they deserve .

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

No. Armaan never gets leeway that Ruhi does. But I guess you are just going to see what you want to see. So let agree to disagree.

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Okay, let's see the future tracks. If Abhira doesn't divorce him for this and Armaan and Rohit don't go to jail, I hope you join me in requesting the writers to stop giving both Armaan and Ruhi leeway and send both to jail like they deserve .

No. I am not going to join you anything, because I unlike you can differentiate between a character who does get a leeway and one who does not

As, I said Let Ruhi face half of all that Armaan has faced. We will talk.

Okay, I am reading through some threads but not all. If it is, I disagree with them and if anyone mentions as such in my thread, I will call them out.

Yes, I expect more from Armaan as the ML. He is supposed to be positive. When he commits crimes and is still supposed to be a positive character, I will call it out.

I used the scenario to point out how the narratives change according to the character. I don't get your last point. When did I say that I want Abhira to be in coma and Ruhi to be the mother of her child? Please show me that. If the scenario was reversed, I will be bashing Ruhi instead. If they are some people who wished for that, go take it up with them. Children should stay with their mothers. My point is if Ruhi did what Armaan did, she would have been instantly called a criminal and asked to be sent to jail.

Originally posted by: Drna7

@bold - You really have to check out other threads if you think this.

@ul - firse Armaan beech mein aa gaya??

Why talk about something that didn't happened? But as you said it yourself then it's same as people wanted Ab in coma and Ru to be mother of child. In that case they would have loved it but not now

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Okay, I am reading through some threads but not all. If it is, I disagree with them and if anyone mentions as such in my thread, I will call them out.

Yes, I expect more from Armaan as the ML. He is supposed to be positive. When he commits crimes and is still supposed to be a positive character, I will call it out.

I used the scenario to point out how the narratives change according to the character. I don't get your last point. When did I say that I want Abhira to be in coma and Ruhi to be the mother of her child? Please show me that. If the scenario was reversed, I will be bashing Ruhi instead. If they are some people who wished for that, go take it up with them. Children should stay with their mothers. My point is if Ruhi did what Armaan did, she would have been instantly called a criminal and asked to be sent to jail.

@bold - not talking about you but others.