Poll
Please vote whom you find to be strong in technical aspect
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 29th Nov 2025 - WKV
VIDYA KA PLAN 29.11
PARTY FAILED 👎30. 11
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 30th Nov 2025 - WKV
🏏S A tour of India, 2025: India vs South Africa,1st ODI-- Ranchi🏏
Deepika Padukone’s sister Anisha is getting married
Ye Rishta completes 5000
Taniya did right not eating Pizza. Self respect is more important.
4 generations : 5000 episodes.
What is Ananya wearing in TMMTMTTM Title Song?
Are you interested to watch Dhurandhar?
Mannat…Episode updates my style
Vachan dile tu maala: new show Pravaah
Ranveer gets brutally slammed for mocking Chavundi Daiva
What Happened To Aashiqui Fame Mr. Rahul Roy
Jaya Bachchan- " I'm a disciplinarian,I wanted to join the military "
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - Episode Discussion Thread #1
First of all - EXCELLENT POSTING Anu!
Aneek: feelings: sings with genuine feelings. notes: great low notes, high notes - just a little under. 'throws' the words with great clarity. gives importance to variations. Needs to concentrate more on singing and less on performance. he's already a singer
Poonam: feelings: you have to listen to Vande, best song ever sung on S, notes: great high notes, variations: doesn't cut corners and sings each syllable with original taal, diction: each word is thrown with superb clarity - they just pierce through. Needs to rest her voice before she sings
Difference between Amanat and Aneek: check out them singing the same song (start at 2:00)
I'm having trouble pinning down my choice here as well. If I completely ignore voice quality, Aneek and Amanat are the strongest in terms of technique.
I agree to your point.But can I ask you is technically correct the only criteria to be a successful singer unless you have a good voice quality.
Do you think Aneek's pronounciation of hindi and punjabi words are upto the mark?
Please hear is apne song where there are little punjabi and pure hindi words.
Secondly Amanat is technically correct but I feel when it comes to high pitching or singing the songs fast his voice doesnt come out louder even if he tries.
Thirdly if a singer has voice and he knows about music he can correct himself technically in times to come.It will just require riyaz and a good GURU to correct himself.
So now say who is the best among the contestents and who is going to get success in Indian music industry in times to come.
Originally posted by: ranjusweet
I agree to your point.But can I ask you is technically correct the only criteria to be a successful singer unless you have a good voice quality.
I never said that only a technically correct singer is successful. Success and technical prowess are not necessarily two sides of the same coin.
Do you think Aneek's pronounciation of hindi and punjabi words are upto the mark?
I think his Hindi pronunciation is very good. Punjabi is not perfect, but decent. However, I have already commented that his English rapping is not up to the mark in my previous post.
Please hear is apne song where there are little punjabi and pure hindi words.
I do not know this song very well, so I cannot comment on it.
Secondly Amanat is technically correct but I feel when it comes to high pitching or singing the songs fast his voice doesnt come out louder even if he tries.
Yes, I said the same thing in a previous post. But, technically, when you look at sur, taal, laya, ornamentation - he is stronger than the rest.
Thirdly if a singer has voice and he knows about music he can correct himself technically in times to come.It will just require riyaz and a good GURU to correct himself.
Yes, that applies to everyone.
So now say who is the best among the contestents and who is going to get success in Indian music industry in times to come.
That is a different question, which requires a different analysis. My analysis is purely technical and very cut and dried in that aspect. I am looking at Sur, Taal, Laya, Ornamentation, Breath Control, Diction, Feel and the sum-total of these aspects. I am not looking at voice quality or timbre.
My personal opinion on who is going to be successful in the future is very different from the conclusions of this analysis.
I never mentioned Raja in my post was just seeking expert views on my points.
Somebody mentioned that if you have a good voice then technique will come with enough practice and proper guidance. But is that really true? I mean a good voice can have technical limitations is what I've always thought. So maybe somebody can shed some light on this.