The hands you take and the hands you leave Part 63-Updated page 149 - Page 91

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

One thing I have to tell. There was only one difference between Arjuna, Karna or Ekalavya whatever it is. For Arjuna the glass was half full, while for others it was half empty. We always say this person suffered for Arjuna, this person suffered for Arjuna what is so great about Arjuna. Nothing, only the attitude.

Life was not easy for him. He was a prince born in a jungle. He won the hand of a woman in swayamvar whom his mother asked to share between 4 of his brothers. Did Karna shared his wife. Answer is no. He didnt.

He was made a slave by his elder brother. His friend told him to choose between his power and himself. His friend who is called Narayan didnt protect the child he loved so much who was brutally killed in Chakravyuha.

Did Arjuna complain, did he hate kunti, did he hate Yudhi, did he question Krishna. Answer is no. He took life the way it was, he accepted what life gave him. When life threw stone at him, instead of hitting back he caught it. He became the fragrance of Lord Krishna because of whom Bhagavad Gita happened. He asked Lord direction when he was in pain. He followed the direction. He owned up his actions. It was not the situation that defined him, he defined the situation.

Karna, Ekalavya was always victims the world saw. But they never saw Arjun the husband who was a victim, Arjun the brother who was a victim, Arjun the son who was a victim, because he never told sob stories, he masked it with a smile. To see Arjun as victim, Abhi had to die.

You always have the path of using the fire to burn others or become a lamp, whatever situation you are in. You can committ a mistake but defining your circumstance to support a crime doesnt really make you a victim. Then the victim becomes the criminal.

People easily relate to sob stories because that is what 99% people do. Because of x,y,z circumstances I did certain things. I am not bad. It is the remaining 1% those fighters, those real victims, those many times are bad in front of the society who really the need the support because they dont know how to tell they are victims or present a sob story.

This is my perspective, people can make many perspective out of MB. For me I had always followed glass is half full attitude of Arjun.

I have been a silent stalker of this thread!😆 Must say I thoroughly enjoy the show and the different perspectives on this thread a lot! Your post forced me out of my silent stalking mode😆

Karna chose to follow his passion.he did not hesitate to lie and seek the knowledge he desired. He did not hesitate to tow the line of his friend aiding and abetting Dushasana. He had no qualms about breaking the rules of war and cornering the young Abhimanyu.

I know nobody will agree with me on this but I will state what I felt. Why are we calling Bhishma, Drona and Karna as evil people and cowards? Because they didn't stop the disrobe? Why will anyone else do that when her own husbands were dipped their heads like cowards? When they watched their own wife being disrobed helplessly in the name od Dharma, how safe are the ladies in their rule? Duryodhan did all that to enrage them, ti make them wage a war or fight l, so that he could prove his ability but they succumbed and let Draupadi battle on her own to save her chastity. Draupadi took a vow saying she will not tue her hair till she apply Duryodhan's blood to it to avenge his act but why she didn't make any such vow against her husbands for they let Duryodhan do such thing to her? If what pandava's did was dharma because they obeyed their brother, how the same was termed wrong when others followed their king?

Originally posted by: moonwearer

Karna chose to follow his passion.he did not hesitate to lie and seek the knowledge he desired. He did not hesitate to tow the line of his friend aiding and abetting Dushasana. He had no qualms about breaking the rules of war and cornering the young Abhimanyu.

He chose to fight with Duryodhan who he knew was unfair. He chose to play the victim card.

His mother may have abandoned him but he was raised in love. The Pandavas were princes but were constantly in a state of struggle. Attempts were made on their life, they were banished and had to live incognito. They never bemoaned. The only time they questioned their brother was when they were enslaved.

In the name of social justice India has a reservation system that is allowing mediocrity to thrive and while I see the so called FC struggling to hone in on skills there is a total apathy in some others as they get away as opportunities are easily created for them.

Has Satrupa choices been easy ? She has had to forget her personal preferences putting those of RS and LM ahead.

She was not responsible for Sudhas initial injustice, yet it is she that has suffered greater loss. Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. ..The mantle of LM has been a crucifix. Even now there is name calling and plotting. She bears it all as she chooses to follow the dharma dictated by her role.

Originally posted by: deejagi

I know nobody will agree with me on this but I will state what I felt. Why are we calling Bhishma, Drona and Karna as evil people and cowards? Because they didn't stop the disrobe? Why will anyone else do that when her own husbands were dipped their heads like cowards? When they watched their own wife being disrobed helplessly in the name od Dharma, how safe are the ladies in their rule? Duryodhan did all that to enrage them, ti make them wage a war or fight l, so that he could prove his ability but they succumbed and let Draupadi battle on her own to save her chastity. Draupadi took a vow saying she will not tue her hair till she apply Duryodhan's blood to it to avenge his act but why she didn't make any such vow against her husbands for they let Duryodhan do such thing to her? If what pandava's did was dharma because they obeyed their brother, how the same was termed wrong when others followed their king?

No i am not justifying what Duryodhan did was right but i am telling what pandava's did at moment was worst. Duryodhan says on this as "Let alone my wife, had someone touched anu of the maids in my state in such way, I would have killed him bare handed and would nothave thought about any dharma as saving a lady from getting dishonored is the utmost Dharma".

If we Agree for Pandava's disguise, why are ee mentioning od Karna's?

Guys let us not be selective in accepting only one set of people as righteous and the others as weong in all circumstances.

Originally posted by: moonwearer

Karna chose to follow his passion.he did not hesitate to lie and seek the knowledge he desired. He did not hesitate to tow the line of his friend aiding and abetting Dushasana. He had no qualms about breaking the rules of war and cornering the young Abhimanyu.

He chose to fight with Duryodhan who he knew was unfair. He chose to play the victim card.

His mother may have abandoned him but he was raised in love. The Pandavas were princes but were constantly in a state of struggle. Attempts were made on their life, they were banished and had to live incognito. They never bemoaned. The only time they questioned their brother was when they were enslaved.

In the name of social justice India has a reservation system that is allowing mediocrity to thrive and while I see the so called FC struggling to hone in on skills there is a total apathy in some others as they get away as opportunities are easily created for them.

Has Satrupa choices been easy ? She has had to forget her personal preferences putting those of RS and LM ahead.

She was not responsible for Sudhas initial injustice, yet it is she that has suffered greater loss. Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. ..The mantle of LM has been a crucifix. Even now there is name calling and plotting. She bears it all as she chooses to follow the dharma dictated by her role.

Originally posted by: moonwearer

Karna chose to follow his passion.he did not hesitate to lie and seek the knowledge he desired. He did not hesitate to tow the line of his friend aiding and abetting Dushasana. He had no qualms about breaking the rules of war and cornering the young Abhimanyu.

He chose to fight with Duryodhan who he knew was unfair. He chose to play the victim card.

His mother may have abandoned him but he was raised in love. The Pandavas were princes but were constantly in a state of struggle. Attempts were made on their life, they were banished and had to live incognito. They never bemoaned. The only time they questioned their brother was when they were enslaved.

In the name of social justice India has a reservation system that is allowing mediocrity to thrive and while I see the so called FC struggling to hone in on skills there is a total apathy in some others as they get away as opportunities are easily created for them.

Has Satrupa choices been easy ? She has had to forget her personal preferences putting those of RS and LM ahead.

She was not responsible for Sudhas initial injustice, yet it is she that has suffered greater loss. Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. ..The mantle of LM has been a crucifix. Even now there is name calling and plotting. She bears it all as she chooses to follow the dharma dictated by her role.

100% agree! Karma is an epitome of "poor me" mentality! The world was bad to him, so he chose to be bad to Draupadi and participated and took the lead in Abhi's murder. If MB is full of cowards, Karna leads the list! He took out his frustrations on a helpless woman, he was the one who egged Duryodhan to disrobe the woman. He also took the lead in Abhi's slaughter. And we idolize him just because he was wronged as a child! Its wrong!!! Somewhere in his life, he had to grow up, stop blaming the world for his plight and take responsibility for his actions! That would hve been respect worthy!

Originally posted by: Mangothyme

I saw Pujan Chacha on Porus doing an important role as Darius. Now I am worried about how it will affect our show. Seeing Kamini chachi instead of Pujan Chacha play villain by accident is making me a bit anxious.

I saw Kamini in a StarBharat show Kala Bhairava😆 playing the heroine's aunt.

Porus was in the making for some time and what we see now might have been shot much earlier.

I guess, these actors are good at managing multiple shows and in RKC except Anami,Satrupa & to some extent Adhi rest of the chars come & go weekly, so I don't think this show will be impacted.

Not to worry.😃 My concern is BD, the actor hardly gets any scenes and i hope he waits around for track to gather momentum.