Were they wrong? - Page 5

Originally posted by: a_uma

Shruti,

The same can be said for police / court system also.... most criminals are out on bail within hours and it is the complainant who usually suffers.... just like Krishna said.... doing rounds of police stations / courts for justice.... also I don't really believe that Krishna would hv actually gone to the extent of killing someone...

Originally posted by: a_uma

Shruti,

The same can be said for police / court system also.... most criminals are out on bail within hours and it is the complainant who usually suffers.... just like Krishna said.... doing rounds of police stations / courts for justice.... also I don't really believe that Krishna would hv actually gone to the extent of killing someone...

Originally posted by: shruthiR

Hey Binny,

but I am sure violence isn't the solution to things such as this.Undoubtedly we all know how corrupt our legal sytem is and Krishna was right but not single one of them will be like that right?I felt that Aman was patient and tried to explain politely but being a human being he was bound to lose his cool once Krishna started becoming agressive and refused to try and understand what he told him.Pratigya was right but Krishna felt that she insulted him despite her only trying to make him understand that beating the thief up si brutally was wrong!

Originally posted by: shruthiR

there is a difference between supporting and taking upto violence when such things are concerned.Pick-pocketting is something which is totally different from eve-teasing,sexual harassment. Pratigya does support Kesar and tries to make Shakti,SS and all understand but do u ever see her beating the life out of them to make them understand?NO! Krishna shouldn't have beaten the theif up as no one has the right to beat anyone else.And there is a difference between mindlessly and brutally beating someone and self-defence.

Originally posted by: shruthiR

Krishna was beating him really very badly that if you noticed the theif was actually bleeding and it isn't abt whether he'd go upto the extent of killing him but he deffinitely did go overboard with it and crossed his limit.Our system is as such that it had a mix of both bad and good ppl,you can't always think that the person whose going to deal with such ppl will always be corrupt.

Originally posted by: Binny1247

Nisha how can these situations be compared to one another prats slapped angad in self defense, and she only slapped him while Krishna is beating a man to an extant where he could have lost his life.

Originally posted by: ArhainArhaan

buh wateva he did i being a krishu fan didnt lyk he shudnt av done dat n prats she shudnt av behaved lyk tis wit her hubby infrotn ov every1 on d road:O
n he wasnt beatin ne innocent person was he???
n y did he call krishu a goon>>he was beatin a thief n tis aman cld him a goon:O
n teme shurhitr sis was d police gona treat dat theif as in a royal manner were dey gona give him tea n coffee amans fav thingofcourse nah dey were infact gona beatenup him even more severly n harshly👏👏👏krishu tu ek tha police walay k se ziada hotey hainwen krishu was beatin dat kid i myself agreed n said y creatives y did u make ma krishu bad buh where krishu is ryt i av to say hes ryt😳😳😳

Originally posted by: Binny1247

Shruthi

I agree violence is not the only solution but in this specific situation I have say Krishna's reaction was necessary though as I stated before he took it too far, but in reality if this man was handed over to the police, he may be questioned, sometimes beaten, then released to continue with his illegal actions. Now that could happen most likely though he would simply be warned and freed, now in this situation the man would get no punishment but that poor middle class person would be stuck going to court repeatedly with the false hope of ever getting justice. No I don't mean never consult the police but in such trivial matters police may end up doing more harm then good, and no Shruthi not all police officers are bad but the good one's are hard to find.

Aman lost his cool which is acceptable but i don't understand why he felt the need to comment and interfere between him and prats if I am right when he commented Krishna was talking to prats !!

Originally posted by: shruthiR

So u do accept that ur supporting just coz ur his fan is it? Are u telling me that she should've supported him regardless of the fact that he was wrong since he was bruatlly beating up a guy? I think more that supporting ur partner even though they are wrong supporting what is right and trying to make them understand is more important.

A person who guides you along what is right and teaches you how to differentiate between right and wrong is someone who can be respected and truly loves you more than the one who supports your wrong acts and blindly follows you and that's exactly what Pratigya did,she truly loves and cares for him and that's why she was trying to make him understand but he took it in the wrong manner,she is not wrong for supporting what is right Arhaina sis and since the police was gonna beat him up anyway why did Krishna have to do it?he could've left it upto them.and Krishna was behaving like a goon by beating that theif up so brutally.