Were they wrong? - Page 4

buh wateva he did i being a krishu fan didnt lyk he shudnt av done dat n prats she shudnt av behaved lyk tis wit her hubby infrotn ov every1 on d road:O
n he wasnt beatin ne innocent person was he???
n y did he call krishu a goon>>he was beatin a thief n tis aman cld him a goon:O
n teme shurhitr sis was d police gona treat dat theif as in a royal manner were dey gona give him tea n coffee amans fav thingofcourse nah dey were infact gona beatenup him even more severly n harshly👏👏👏krishu tu ek tha police walay k se ziada hotey hainwen krishu was beatin dat kid i myself agreed n said y creatives y did u make ma krishu bad buh where krishu is ryt i av to say hes ryt😳😳😳

Originally posted by: anjalisharma200

I am surprised by some of the responses here. are people really putting the relationships/ marriage above what is right and what is wrong. (i just wanted to add in that even Bhagvad Gita shows that standing with the right is more important than the relationships). just like charity begins at home, so does the justice. i commend Pratigya's behavior to take a stand with what is right. also, Krishna needs to learn that beating up/violence is not the answer.

I agree it is petty to fight over a pickpocket's situation in the middle of the road and in front of the crowd.

I agree he was part of the mob and has the mob mentality what else you could expect from an illiterate goon. Unfortunate that not only he embarrassed himself but his wife in public too.

Originally posted by: shruthiR

I agree that he did cross the line by saying that Krishna deserved to be beaten up but wasn't that after Krishna showed agression from his side.I don't get it,if Krishna becomes agressive it goes down well with the audiance but if someone else is agressive be it through words or actions they immediately start pointing out there mistakes,why is that so?has this fan crze thing come to such a level where one even tends to forget what is right and what isn't?😕

Originally posted by: nisha2010

y upto d frnd..??...........i think angad was wrong and he def deserved that slap..........if men intervene a lady being harrassed is it d lady's call whether she shd let them intervene...............same inside TN....do u think it still shd b kesar's call on d remarriage issue,.............P shd not support her.........i think P shd def support kesar..............

there is a difference between supporting and taking upto violence when such things are concerned.Pick-pocketting is something which is totally different from eve-teasing,sexual harassment. Pratigya does support Kesar and tries to make Shakti,SS and all understand but do u ever see her beating the life out of them to make them understand?NO! Krishna shouldn't have beaten the theif up as no one has the right to beat anyone else.And there is a difference between mindlessly and brutally beating someone and self-defence.

Originally posted by: anjalisharma200

Thanks Shruthi for making this topic. I agree with you. i do not think they were wrong. it is difficult to reason with krishna at times. But that does not mean that pratigya should not show him the correct/better way. hope to see them talk over this tomorrow.

Your welcome Anjali.I just hope that rather than supporting one's fav character things which happen to be right will be given more importance to😊

Originally posted by: nisha2010

shruthi ..............y did pratigya slap angad for wat he did to her in d train...........y didn't she wait for d police............?????

Nisha how can these situations be compared to one another prats slapped angad in self defense, and she only slapped him while Krishna is beating a man to an extant where he could have lost his life.

Shruthi 😊

I am just going to look at the entire situation !!
.
According to me today all three were correct in their own way, Krishna was not wrong in saying the legal system is questionable and his reaction is realistic petty thieves are given street justice in India. Now that does not mean he should have beaten the thief to such an extant that he could have lost his life, but I saw a lot of truth in his statement about spending all of your life on a court case and getting nothing out of it as much as I believe in the legal system in India the police and legal systems are corrupt. Krishna could have handled the situation differently but he was not completely wrong !! Prats and Aman were correct the thief should not have been beaten so mercilessly Krishna was taking things a bit too far. Personally I can understand prats she was trying to calm Krishna down, unfortunately aman was of no help he should know Krishna by now and his comments were truly unnecessary regardless of the message he was trying to portray.

Originally posted by: a_uma

Shruti,

It is not a question of supporting Krishna blindly..... street justice does work.... ask any girl who has been eve-teased .... whether court / police act as a deterrent to such goons or an angry mob...

Both Prats and Aman hv grown up in Allahabad..... they are not blind to the realities in small towns.... adopting a holier-than-thou attitude is really ridiculous in such circumstances....

But Uma,a few ppl here are saying that Aman and Pratigya are wrong just beacuse they supported what was right and they are angry just coz Aman told Krishna that even he deserves to be beaten up.If they are supporting someone who is wrong then it deffinitely is more abt their fav character then what is right or wrong.They might have grown up in Allahabad but one thing is for sure,brutally beating someone up is not the solution to such things.Fine,you bash him up for what he did and take the law into your own hands but what guarantee is there tht he won't do it again.That's why it's best to leave the law to take up all this as they'll know how to deal with it and I am sure not every police officer is bad and there are good police officers as well who deal with such issues in the right way.

Originally posted by: shruthiR

there is a difference between supporting and taking upto violence when such things are concerned.Pick-pocketting is something which is totally different from eve-teasing,sexual harassment. Pratigya does support Kesar and tries to make Shakti,SS and all understand but do u ever see her beating the life out of them to make them understand?NO! Krishna shouldn't have beaten the theif up as no one has the right to beat anyone else.And there is a difference between mindlessly and brutally beating someone and self-defence.

Absolutely right Shruthi, Krishna's act was not only mindless but dumb. He is much better then the mob mentality that he showed by beating a pick pocket.

Originally posted by: Binny1247

Nisha how can these situations be compared to one another prats slapped angad in self defense, and she only slapped him while Krishna is beating a man to an extant where he could have lost his life.

Shruthi 😊

I am just going to look at the entire situation !!
.
According to me today all three were correct in their own way, Krishna was not wrong in saying the legal system is questionable and his reaction is realistic petty thieves are given street justice in India. Now that does not mean he should have beaten the thief to such an extant that he could have lost his life, but I saw a lot of truth in his statement about spending all of your life on a court case and getting nothing out of it as much as I believe in the legal system in India the police and legal systems are corrupt. Krishna could have handled the situation differently but he was not completely wrong !! Prats and Aman were correct the thief should not have been beaten so mercilessly Krishna was taking things a bit too far. Personally I can understand prats she was trying to calm Krishna down, unfortunately aman was of no help he should know Krishna by now and his comments were truly unnecessary regardless of the message he was trying to portray.

Hey Binny,

Originally posted by: shruthiR

But Uma,a few ppl here are saying that Aman and Pratigya are wrong just beacuse they supported what was right and they are angry just coz Aman told Krishna that even he deserves to be beaten up.If they are supporting someone who is wrong then it deffinitely is more abt their fav character then what is right or wrong.They might have grown up in Allahabad but one thing is for sure,brutally beating someone up is not the solution to such things.Fine,you bash him up for what he did and take the law into your own hands but what guarantee is there tht he won't do it again.That's why it's best to leave the law to take up all this as they'll know how to deal with it and I am sure not every police officer is bad and there are good police officers as well who deal with such issues in the right way.