Were they wrong? - Page 7

Originally posted by: -JONAKI-

They were absolutely wrong.Who are they to stop Krishna.Krishna is a hot and handsome guy and Pratigya is his wife.How dare she go against hot hot Krishna.If anybody comes in the way of a good looking guy he is surey wrong but if it was not Krishna and any other guy then they would have been termed right.

So true 😆😆

Originally posted by: krishna_chalbo

So Krishna was also wrong when he beat up Angad when he was chasing Pratigya on his motocycle in the whole of Allahabad. Surprisingly Pratigya didn't file a police complain despite her faith in the system or it could be she thought it was small thing and can be ignored😕

Both Prats and Arushi fled before Krishna came and beat Angad for his own purpose. That was wrong too. Here beating that thief and taking law in his own hand was not appropriate. especially when his wife, Arushi and her in-laws and komal was there. He proved that he believes in violence and rule of law has no meaning for him. But unfortunately the same Krishna will one day uphold the trust in law and will appreciate Pratigya for showing him the correct path. That time is not far when his own family will face a situation where they could be facing the brunt of the street justice.

Originally posted by: anjalisharma200

i believe everyone has a right to defend him/herself. In that situation- she was defending her honor and life. if you look at the second time she slapped, she was actually waiting for the police to come but angad crossed limits.

the thief stole valuables that could be returned. he did not threaten krishna or anyone else's life.

Exactly Anjali 👍🏼 Krishna's brutal beating actually was so embarrassing. To me when he got the stolen wallet returned to the rightful owner he should have let them take the thief to the police station. Krishna should have enjoyed the outing with his wife and should have decency to leave that place rather then embarrassing everyone.

krishna was wrong in my opinion. i wouldnt want my husband to do that on the street.

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

Both Prats and Arushi fled before Krishna came and beat Angad for his own purpose. That was wrong too. Here beating that thief and taking law in his own hand was not appropriate. especially when his wife, Arushi and her in-laws and komal was there. He proved that he believes in violence and rule of law has no meaning for him. But unfortunately the same Krishna will one day uphold the trust in law and will appreciate Pratigya for showing him the correct path. That time is not far when his own family will face a situation where they could be facing the brunt of the street justice.

ya they fled in a rickshaw and Angad in a bike right behind them wouldn't have caught them if Krishna hadn't intervened. rickshaw must be doing 120mph.

BTW Why is it unfortunate that he will uphold the trust in the law and appreciate his intelligent, educated biwi showed him the correct path. isn't that all kriya lovers want- for him to give up his believes and become a Pratigyas puppet😕

Originally posted by: Binny1247

[

I agree Shruthi there is no guarantee the thief will ever change just like there is no guarantee calling the police for this situation will get the victim justice. I am not supporting Krishna's reaction especially when he could have handled it differently but it was realistic these things do take place. Personally Aman was right but the way he handled the situation was not acceptable, I would have preferred he did not interfere between husband and wife especially when prats was trying to calm Krishna down and take care of the situation in the correct manner.

agree binny............👏

Originally posted by: shruthiR

Ok,let's just put aside all this fan craze for the time being and think properly,were Pratigya and Aman wrong in asking Krishna to not take the law into his hands and to leave it upto the police since what Krishna was doing was wrong since it's not correct to beat up a person and neither does he have the right to do so.Aman might have crossed his limits by saying that even Krishna desreves to be beaten up but let's face it,he was trying to make him understand things in Krishna's own language.And in what way is Pratigya wrong in supporting what's right?She wasn't insulting him infact she was trying to make him understand that what he was doing is wrong but he's just refusing to see or accept the fact that she is right and walked off in a huff!And now this arguement might affect people within the family and might create misunderstandings.

Well, I definitely agree that what Krishna did was not right. I am against taking law in your own hands period. Well saying that I do know that krishna's character has always being portrayed as somebody who would go against law anytime. So I was not surprised at all. Also India's judicial system is very different from America. here if you call 911 police will be at your service by 10 minutes. But in India the picture is entirely different where police are corrupted. So I guess public takes matters in their own hands. india also has a mob mentality which is immensely powerful. Nevertheless i do not agree in taking law in your hands.

Anu Sarkar you live in America.,..right...and your sustem is so good that it is addressed within 10 minutes....good....but when America drops bomb on IRAQ ..for personal...interest..OR....SELLS arms and ammunation.....then......

shurti,