Were they wrong? - Page 3

Originally posted by: a_uma

True, did she not marry the very same Krishna to whom she is now preaching, because she was unable to get any help from police / court......

One aspect of this serial which I find very sad is that Krishna no matter what kind of a person he is - he always supports his wife in front of others, whether he agrees with her views or not, whereas she never supports him in any way......

actually, i see it this way- krishna supports pratigya because she is right. if krishna is right, pratigya should and i expect her to support him. which is where i think this track is headed. would be interesting to see.

Originally posted by: elle45

Well, this time I have to agree with Krishna . I think he was doing the right thing and Aman and Prats were wrong but not completely. The thief did deserve to be beat up. If someone's a criminal then they do need to be taught a lesson and a little beating by Krishna was not bad. I do think however that Krishna went a bit overboard and after a few slaps, he should have stopped,, called the police and they should have taken over. Prats and Aman should not have said Krishna was completely wrong, they should have said Dont overdo the beating.

The thing is, we can't trust the corrupt police and judicial system here. Usually in such minor theft cases. the thief is taken to the police station, they take some money from him as rishwat and then he's let go immediatly, free to go on as before. In such cases, ppl think why not teach him a little lesson before he goes scot-free.

And I think Aman was also wrong in saying Krishna should be beaten up. Aman lectures so much but I really cant trust his moral values, coz he did assist a murderer out of jail, Shyamji. (I still think the Prof deliberately killed Angad)

Originally posted by: nisha2010

so she wudn't hav slapped him if it was one of her frns................😲

She would've deffinitely intervened but I am sure it would be upto her friend as to how she would plan to punish him.

Originally posted by: nisha2010

y is it then d ppl who r responsible for sexual harrassment left by d law after paying a petty fine .............??

yes, i know that they are and we need to do something about that. but that does not mean we stoop down to their level and take law in our hands. Strength in character/person is demonstrated by how well they behave in tough times.

Originally posted by: carisma2

In my opinion, fighting for the right thing is fine and every one should do that, but letting your partner down in public - there is no excuse for that. no one should come above your partner - i would never let my partner down lke that.

so your saying that no matter how wrong your partner is you should support him/her instead of trying to make him/her realize that what they did was wrong?

Originally posted by: shruthiR

that was because he was misbeahving with her directly,he wasn't eve teasing someone else now was he?

Well Shruthi Krishna was too dumb to act like a street judge beating that guy in my opinion.

Originally posted by: shruthiR

She would've deffinitely intervened but I am sure it would be upto her friend as to how she would plan to punish him.

y upto d frnd..??...........i think angad was wrong and he def deserved that slap..........if men intervene a lady being harrassed is it d lady's call whether she shd let them intervene...............same inside TN....do u think it still shd b kesar's call on d remarriage issue,.............P shd not support her.........i think P shd def support kesar..............

Originally posted by: lucky174

In my point of view, yes they were wrong. In a countries like Pak & India all this "dont take law into ur hands" looks crap. in our country people hand over the culprits to police & police releases them within few hrs or days. to murder someone is definitely wrong but to beat up a thief like krishna did is not wrong. Why wait for the police. if police & law were so efficient these crimes wouldnt have taken place.

I deffinitely have to disagree with you there my friend since no one has the right to treat someone else so brutally.Hitting someone is also taken as an offence.It may seem like crap to you but what they said is right since nobody has the right to take the law into their hands and beat someone else up for what they did regardless of the location.Although the police may not be that efficient but one should let the law deal with such issues.An instead of having the theif beaten up,like Pratigya said,the person whom the theif tried to steal from can punish him with the help of the law. I think the best thing to do would've been to ask the victim as to how he would like to deal with the theif rather than just jumping into it.But still if ppl continue to be this agressive and take things into their own hands then I am sure by now many ppl would've died due to being beaten up brutally!

Thanks Shruthi for making this topic. I agree with you. i do not think they were wrong. it is difficult to reason with krishna at times. But that does not mean that pratigya should not show him the correct/better way. hope to see them talk over this tomorrow.