Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC
The way he was beating him, had Prats and Aman not interfered, he could have killed him. Then the relatives of the thief reserved the right to do the same street justice ??😆
I Love You Armaan
HOLIKA DAHAN 3.3
Happy Holi- celebrity pictures /videos
With is with those expressions? Alia's interview at Bafta
Abhimaan Ki 4th Shaadi
Why was Dharundar snubbed at Zee Awards
Toxic Postponed To 4th June 2026
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: First Semi-Final- SA vs NZ🏏
Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC
The way he was beating him, had Prats and Aman not interfered, he could have killed him. Then the relatives of the thief reserved the right to do the same street justice ??😆
yes a crime is a crime but should't the punishment also be given accordingly.At the rate Krishna was going the theif would've been severly injured if not dead.I think Pratigya stopping both the mob and Krishna was right since neither of them were trying to understand the difference between what was right and what isn't.What Aman said was wrong for sure but that was said at the heat of the moment when he got irritated with Krishna for refusing to accept the fact that he was wrong in brutally beating up that theif despite Pratigya and him trying to explain.Originally posted by: nisha2010
isn't crime a crime...........big or small........stealing a few hundreds or guzzling crores..........??and really i don't think he wud hav killed d theif............he stopped once aman held his hand.......... d mob was furious wen d theif tried to escape........her stopping d mob was right cuz that wud havde killed him.........K did not mind aman interrupting he just cud not take it wen he said even K shd b punished by breaking his legs
The way he was beating him, had Prats and Aman not interfered, he could have killed him. Then the relatives of the thief reserved the right to do the same street justice ??😆
Originally posted by: shruthiR
So u do accept that ur supporting just coz ur his fan is it? Are u telling me that she should've supported him regardless of the fact that he was wrong since he was bruatlly beating up a guy? I think more that supporting ur partner even though they are wrong supporting what is right and trying to make them understand is more important.
A person who guides you along what is right and teaches you how to differentiate between right and wrong is someone who can be respected and truly loves you more than the one who supports your wrong acts and blindly follows you and that's exactly what Pratigya did,she truly loves and cares for him and that's why she was trying to make him understand but he took it in the wrong manner,she is not wrong for supporting what is right Arhaina sis and since the police was gonna beat him up anyway why did Krishna have to do it?he could've left it upto them.and Krishna was behaving like a goon by beating that theif up so brutally. 👍🏼
I agree Shruthi there is no guarantee the thief will ever change just like there is no guarantee calling the police for this situation will get the victim justice. I am not supporting Krishna's reaction especially when he could have handled it differently but it was realistic these things do take place. Personally Aman was right but the way he handled the situation was not acceptable, I would have preferred he did not interfere between husband and wife especially when prats was trying to calm Krishna down and take care of the situation in the correct manner.Originally posted by: shruthiR
But what guarantee is there by beating him up so badly the theif is going to change?he might start doing the same thing again once he becomes alright jutst like how it would've been after the police left him. The good ones might be hard to find but it deffinitely isn't impossible.I think Aman interupted when Krishna just refused to understand what Pratigya was trying to tell him to try and make it abit more clear although he wasn't right in saying that Krishna should aslo be beaten up.
Originally posted by: ArhainArhaan
hes nah a gooon..dun cal him a goonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn