Pratigya to 'Learn a Lesson?'

Hello all, 😃

If they are tagging this serial as realistic....then I don't think this serial can get any ficticious if Prats falls in love with Krishna. Which I totally hope she does though. Cuz at the end of the day, it's all fictional. And I hope for some good love scenes. If prats and Krishna don't bother getting along, then go Komal and Adarsh. Well Adarch is a bit of douch bag. I don't see any love scenes between Shakti and Kesar. Shakti is just evil. Neither do I see anything for SS and his chick, cuz he has too much pride. I don;t even wanna talk about love scenes from Professor Saxena. What will he do? Read his wife a book lol? Arushi and Grandma are destined to be together. Roli needs to leave the serial, her stint is done.

Originally posted by: Charishma

Hello all, 😃

I've decided to start a thread to disect Pratigya and Krishna's relationship. In recent days, Krishna's behaviour towards her, in my opninion, has taken a turn for the worst.

There are two sides to this argument. People who beleive Krishna did no wrong (I think most pple from his fan club have condemned his act of violence and genuinely sympathised with Pratigya. I guess most of us are women and we feel Pratigya's pain but just because we show an understanding of where he is coming from doesn't give the msg that we believe that all is actions are just) , and people who beleive he did do wrong.

I've read in more than one place on this forum that some beleive Pratigya is now "learning a lesson." Little slip-ups like this really get me down. Like Pratigya isn't her own person. Like she is a child (Who said learning only happens in childhood. Learning is a life long process). Like she doesn't have a mind of own, thoughts of her own, morals and values of her own (A person who can make decsion, has his or her mind, has a morals and values of his own doesn't mean he/she knows everything)..😭

Don't misunderstand me. I get that she is his wife. But does that give him the right to demand sex?? (No with a capital N. No man has a right to demand sex from his wife but than isn't it natural for a normal person to share a physical relation with the person you luv) Does that give him the right to be physically abusive? (No it doesnot give him the right to abuse a person but then we all react differently when we are angry as Pratigya acted. Didn't she marry him to take revenge as she was angry at him. She decided to make his life miserable by marrying him. Is mental abuse any less than physical abuse?) And no, he was "frustrated" is not an excuse. His background is not an excuse.( Yes his upbringing has everything to do with it. Just mentioned it in another post: Even in the court of law before making a decsion whether a deed is wrong or right the circumstances in which the deed was done is taken into account.)

I wouldn't be so against Krishna, if only he had taken responsibility for his actions (I think taking responsibilty for your actions is very high level of maturity where as all his life Krish has been treated as a child who has been pampared and is allowed to get away with his demands. He has never been allowed to grow up by his luved ones) . He hits her,a nd then blames her (Again a typical child like behaviour) . For anyone who has ever come across a Psychological profile for an abuser (I think you are being a bit harsh on him but again its your POV), that attitude is sadly, characteristic. ...Please come to your senses Krishna (Don't worry he will come to his senses there is hope for that man). I don't want to hate this show...

We all agree on one thing. Krishna behaves the way he does because he deoesn't know any better. Krishna can't help his background.

But...the kicker here is...he can help his actions (Yes he can and will once he realises his actions are wrong at present he is like a frog in a well whose world ends in the well) . Your actions are your own.

I am asking people to please stop justifying Krishna's actions because of his background. Find some other reason. If we justified the actions of every frustrated person with a rotton childhood, the world would be in a sad state of affairs (Again one cannot ignore ones upbringing as it makes the person you are. If a child is brought up in a dumb environment he/she will never learn to speak as he/she has never heard anyone speak.)

I am not trying to convince people that Krishna doesn't love Pratigya. People do some crazy stuff in the name of love (I do believe Love makes you do the wacky as it is a very strong emotion). For example all Shakespeare plays...😆

I just want to come to some kind of resolution/understanding about his actions.

What say all of you? Do you think Pratigya is in the wrong or right by refusing to have "marital relations" with him? Why or why not? (No she was not wrong in refusing physical relation, every one shld have the right to do so esp if you don't love the person. She was wrong in the way she handled the whole situation. When she decided to get married to a goon she shld have realised what she was getting into. I think Physical relation is expected from any marriage unless it is platonic. I think if she just been a little sensitive and mature she shld have talked to Krishna and told him her apprehensions but she was blinded by hatered and anger. In a quite atmosphere told him what he had done how she felt about him. How difficult is it judge a person's temper if you have already seen him behave the way he did on her engagement to Nitin.) What do you think of Krishna's reaction? Justified or not, under the circumstances? (I don't want to be repetitive here his anger was justified not his way of expressing it. But the way he expressed it brings us back to us upbringing so i sympathize with him. I don't think anybody likes to loose control of themselves)

Ps: I have an obvious bias 😊. But if you disagree with me, please feel free to say so...

Also, as an aside, what does everyone think of the argument that Pratigya should have been prepared for Suhaag Raat? What make you of this "wifely obligation" argument?(I personally think when a person is made to believe that through out his life it any arguement will annoy him further. I think in when one is as angry no amount of logic wld makes sense hence the violent outburst )

Originally posted by: krishna_chalbo

sorry to add on but it is easier to discuss things as you read on.