Poll

Which do you belive is a bigger "sin"?

Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

2.3k

Users

16

Likes

69

Frequent Posters

Dabulls23 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Luv4games

I honestly cant see the point of giving birth to someone when you cannot take care of them...when I was living in pakistan I used to see couples in slums have tons of kids and they didnt have food or clothes...other times there are children that are being neglected because their parents werent ready for them...why bring up a child when you are just going to let them be miserable?


I understand that if one doesnt want a child then they should take precautions but no form of birth control is 100% effective...and expecting people to practice abstinence for life is not realistic...all pro-life activites should invest their energy on those children that are already in this world and dont have food,clothes, shelter or love...there is no need to force others to have kids who will be just as neglected because they didnt want it in first place...

I agree with you..My first post says use some sort of BC..If they don't want to use any sort than abstinence is the only answser...BC it is not an answer to have an unprotected sex, & have an abortion...Its not fair for one to have unprotected sex than have a child and put it up for adoption or in the system at tax payer's expense..I think you would agree to that.
Adults should be having sex who are prepared with what comes with having sex..I am not being judgemental at all..We all need to learn to curb the urge to surge at time be it sex or something which we cant get..May be even something materialistic.
BTW I understand for poor people only form of entertainment is sex which produces kids...As may be they are not educated..Also unprotected sex means more sexually transmitted disease..With that I rather follow abstinence than UP sex...
Not enough said abt using BC and no UP sex..
Edited by Dabulls23 - 12 years ago
Sakhile thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#22
Both are sins. However, having pre-marital sex is lesser than murder. Abortion is murder. A child that is aborted is nevertheless a human being that is killed. To have pre-marital sex or an abortion is not about individual rights or women's rights over their bodies only. It is abourt the moral responsibility to behave like human beings who have been gifted with intellect that must therefore make them behave with greater morality than animals.
Me_Harini thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#23
both are sins in my view...
but still aborting child is a great sin since in india they tell
"bache bhagwan ke samaan hote hai"

-Inferno- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: nikki1591


only time we may agree. however, i dont agree with the rape concept though. for me if people are against abortion because of the claim that there is a living child inside the body, then does the child stop being a child because the violence used in its conception. i dont think people would say yes to that. i know that the most difficult thing to do after being raped is carry the rapist child.it is an awful thing to do but worse for me is to kill a human being. i can't imagine telling a rape victim no to an abortion but at the same time how can i say a fetus is a human being but not if it was rape. anti-abortionist tend to think that a fetus and a child out of womb is on the same status. i cant say rape as the exemption if i want to keep my beliefs consistent. i too used to be exemption rape untill a girl in my class stated that what fault is it of the child that he/she was concieved in rape. i bring this point forward bc i dont think many people think about the actual child of rape bc their focus is on the rape victim and they dont want to further trauamatize them. its too much of a horror to ask them to carry their rapist child. and yet throughout the century its been done. in fact during the banagladesh liberation war woman were systematically raped and bore their rapists child to full term.
i think this is a very good topic to open up because we have opened up a dialogue for a very serious issue in the real world. rarely in this forum has such a serious issue been discussed and this is a great teaching moment



I agree to the fact that the child has no faults and is still a living human. But, also I have heard of cases where women have given birth to the rapist child and then neglected the child or emotionally tortured them for being a symbol of the tragedy that had occurred. Yes, it is a bigger crime to kill a living person but I feel that it would be better that the child is aborted so they do not have to be mentally abused from its mother/family/society for the rest of their life.
Also, some women can not come to terms with the fact that the child had nothing to do with the tragedy and some aren't even capable of handling themselves so the child would basically be living without a parent even though there is one already.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".