how can you all expected from arjun forget purvi

sharona_bha thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
i know their are a many people who say that arjun is marry to ovi and he should to strat hes new life with her and forget purvi because ovi and arjun are a marrage. i want to remember you all guys one real story in even in our mithology krishna madly in love with radha and he's marrage happen with meera even if he marry meera he never love he's wife he only love radha till their death and till now we all people remember krishna as radha's lover no as meera's husbend.and only krishna and radha's name is popular and not krishna and meera then how can you expected that arjun start to love ovi and forget purvi because ovi is he's wife if our lord krishna was still in love with h'sgirlfreind radha even if was meera's husbend .meera was also good to her husbend she care for him she love him madly and krishna also was a good husbend never hurt he's wife what she want he give her but in he's heart he still he still love radha. and in the end krishna and radhan end together even if they die together but they never get sepreted from each other.and we also remember arjun as purvi's love and not ovi's husbend and they will be still our krishna and shyam that never get sepretd till their death.

Created

Last reply

Replies

24

Views

3.6k

Users

9

Likes

76

Frequent Posters

Kalapi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
Oh my God, please I request not to make a mockery of Radha/Krishna and Meera's love, please don't degrad what all these individual symbolizes to Indians...
This is what I weote somewhere else -

as regard to our mythology...Krishna loved Radha, who was a married woman at that time...besides, the love between Radha and Krishna is beyond the physical sense...

Meera, who was also married to someone else, loved unconditionally Krishna and is considered his greatest Bhakt...She was a devotee of Krishna and was a self-realized soul...Meera was never ever married to Krishna...besides both Krishna/Radha and Meera belonged to different eras...

Besides, according to some text, Radha and Meera forms the twin souls of Krishna...

Edit/Add - Radha was never married to Krishna...never
Edited by Kalapi - 13 years ago
-LiveLaughLove- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Kalapi

Oh my God, please I request not to make a mockery of Radha?Krishna and Meera's love, please don't degrad what all these individual symbolizes to Indians...

This is what I weote somewhere else -

as regard to our mythology'Krishna loved Radha, who was a married woman at that time'..besides, the love between Radha and Krishna is beyond the physical sense'

Meera, who was also married to someone else, loved unconditionally Krishna and is considered his greatest Bhakt'She was a devotee of Krishna and was a self-realized soul''Meera was never ever married to Krishna'besides both Krishna/Radha and Meera belonged to different eras'

Besides, according to some text, Radha and Meera forms the twin souls of Krishna'.

Yes can we please not bring Krishna in this it is not comparable. And I agree you cannot expect Arjun to forget Purvi easily

Edited by xoxoarvi - 13 years ago
Kalapi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4

Forum is weird today...getting double post when I edit..

Edited by Kalapi - 13 years ago
Dabulls23 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#5
I am simply apalled and shocked for TS to bring Lord Krishna and his devotees Radha and Meerabai..
For what and who? Mere mortals of fictional stories??? To justify Arjun-Purvi's love or Arjun-Ovi's divorce to reunite Arjun-Purvi? Pls keep god out of this silly serial 😲😳

Do any of these youngsters know who Radha and Meerabai were?
Lord Krishna was marrked to Rukhmani the first wife who held his heart completely...Than Jambavanti & Satyabhama...
Neither Radha nor Meerabai were Lord Krishna was in love with or were lovers...
Pls do not bring mythological stories to compare with this silly fictional serials..
I am posting mere facts abt who Radha and Meera bai were..
Dabulls23 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: xoxoarvi

Yes can we please not bring Krishna in this it is not comparable. And I agree you cannot expect Arjun to forget Purvi easily

The way I read it is the TS brought Lord Krishna, Radha and Meera bai in their topic...Kalapi is merely answering ...You, Kalapi and I all agree there is no comparison between god and mere mortals...Here TS is comparing them with fictional characters 😲
koolsadhu1000 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#7
My dear i wish to give what little i know about this .

Radha rani as she was known was not Krishna's lover . She was much elder to him and already married . Her self realisation started when she first was tremendously attracted to the divine music when he played the flute . Later a friendship developed in which she lost interest in material things ...namely her sansaar or marital life ...in which she only thought of him as she saw God in him . This happens during sadhana when you are on your way to achieve self realisation ...it is a stage described by many self realized souls .


Meera , like Radha Rani too was a married woman . She had worshipped Krishna since she was a little girl because while watching a wedding procession she had innocently asked her mother ' where is my husband '. Her mother had pointed to a Krishna idol .

Such was her innocence at that tender age that she believed it with her heart and worshipped him so much that when her marraige was really arranged to a King she was already in an advanced spiritual state . So much so that even her husband knew it . Infact the first thing Meera asked him when they got married was if he was going to pull her down from the spiritual level she had reached . And he had answered 'No .'

This is called as 'madhur bhava' and it is a state in self realisation whereby you achieve it by regarding God as your fiancee and giving up your life to him till you reach the total surrender .

There are nine such 'bhavas' in Hinduism whereby one can realise God . Hanuman achieved it by 'Dasya bhava' in which one regards God as the master and the devtee is his servant who does his bidding .

Bhakti is best installed at a young age than old age is a living proof when one studies Radha Rani's life or Meera's life .

They were not even born in the same age . If Radha was born during the time Krishna was physically present Meera was born in a much later time .

There is no comparison between the two ...they both are married ladies who lost interest in material sansaar and achieved self realisation .

One thing they both did ...they did not dump their God at the last minute .😆
Kalapi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: xoxoarvi

Yes can we please not bring Krishna in this it is not comparable. And I agree you cannot expect Arjun to forget Purvi easily

I am not...the TC is..actually it is her second post on the topic...please read in my post in its entirety before quoting me...
Thanks VArsha...
Kalapi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

My dear i wish to give what little i know about this .


Radha rani as she was known was not Krishna's lover . She was much elder to him and already married . Her self realisation started when she first was tremendously attracted to the divine music when he played the flute . Later a friendship developed in which she lost interest in material things ...namely her sansaar or marital life ...in which she only thought of him as she saw God in him . This happens during sadhana when you are on your way to achieve self realisation ...it is a stage described by many self realized souls .


Meera , like Radha Rani too was a married woman . She had worshipped Krishna since she was a little girl because while watching a wedding procession she had innocently asked her mother ' where is my husband '. Her mother had pointed to a Krishna idol .

Such was her innocence at that tender age that she believed it with her heart and worshipped him so much that when her marraige was really arranged to a King she was already in an advanced spiritual state . So much so that even her husband knew it . Infact the first thing Meera asked him when they got married was if he was going to pull her down from the spiritual level she had reached . And he had answered 'No .'

This is called as 'madhur bhava' and it is a state in self realisation whereby you achieve it by regarding God as your fiancee and giving up your life to him till you reach the total surrender .

There are nine such 'bhavas' in Hinduism whereby one can realise God . Hanuman achieved it by 'Dasya bhava' in which one regards God as the master and the devtee is his servant who does his bidding .

Bhakti is best installed at a young age than old age is a living proof when one studies Radha Rani's life or Meera's life .

They were not even born in the same age . If Radha was born during the time Krishna was physically present Meera was born in a much later time .

There is no comparison between the two ...they both are married ladies who lost interest in material sansaar and achieved self realisation .

One thing they both did ...they did not dump their God at the last minute .😆

Oh God Kool...you wrote is so well...thank you...absolutely fab post...loved it simply...
-LiveLaughLove- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

The way I read it is the TS brought Lord Krishna, Radha and Meera bai in their topic...Kalapi is merely answering ...You, Kalapi and I all agree there is no comparison between god and mere mortals...Here TS is comparing them with fictional characters 😲

Oh sorry I may have not been clear. I very much agree with you guys. Krishna is god to me and I do not like it when god is being compared in this it is not comparable! Not even mortals, fictional characters.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".