Originally posted by: hotchoco
Nobody has any superior stand in this. Deepika was happy to work with Vanga if her financial conditions were met. She already knew he was a misogynist and a horrible person and how he treated his female characters in Kabir Singh and Animal. Tripti's character was demeaned by having the alpha male buying cars the color of her hickeys and told to lick his shoes, etc.
What's the point of using feminism and crying about him being a misogynist now when she was accepting of all that and ready to work with him? She knew what she was getting into from the beginning.
She had no problem with the content so framing it as that now is disingenuous.
To what are you replying? My post wasn't about feminism, misogyny, content of the movie or anything which you have mentioned
If you want to say all this then reply to those who are having this debate, why are you writing all this to me?

28