Originally posted by: pomegranate
I agree that sometimes, progressive and regressive can be subjective.
If a women stays at home to take care of her kids and the household, that is considered regressive. However according to me, it is only regressive if she is forced to stay back. if the woman chooses to stay at home on her own volition, then it is fine because I think women making their own decisions is the most progressive thing of all. so yes, in some cases progressive vs. regressive can be subjective. but it is not an one size fits all concept. I don't understand how the concept of child marriage is considered "progressive" to some, I didn't even realize it was subjective.
I agree 100% with this. True progression is giving men and women the freedom to live their life the way they want to, to give them equality in society.
It's not regressive to show a woman as a stay at home mom, if she's happy doing it and she's doing it of her own free will. I know many intelligent, strong women who rule their homes with an iron fist and do it very well, and they're at their element and totally happy. My mother is one of them. 😉 There are also women miserable being at home, because they're not given a choice to go out and work, and that's definitely regressive.
Progressive doesn't necessarily mean changing one's culture and identity to become more 'modern'. True progressiveness is learning to value and respect people despite their race, gender, social class, etc, and learning to value them as a human being. People can be both modern and traditional, and still be progressive if they value what is truly important, and that is human life.