Sorry , I STRONGLY disagree with ALL your POINTS .
She did NOT set out to consume Shravani AT ALL . Consuming is BARBAAD karna . Savita had NO intention of WRECKING Shravani's life AT ALL . She was going to HAPPILY welcome her as a bahu with open arms . Their dream of going to America for a life was WELCOME to her , with an occasional trip thrown in for her like ANY OTHER INDIAN PARENT WISHES . Not ONCE did she treat Shravani badly or ill treat her . She was the closest person to a MOTHER in Shravani's life ...........Shravani NEVER had a problem with her . Manav toiled to give Sachin and Vandita an education . So it was EXPECTED by her as a parent that at least they have an upper middle class life via marraige ..........the shortest way to climb the ladder of social success .......by landing RICH and EDUCATED proposals . Was it so WRONG ? Sulochana wanted it too and so does ANY indian mother . Tomorrow if I look for proposals for My daughters if they permit me to , I too will look for RICH and EDUCATED guys . I won't look for "LOVE" . This is the way arranged marraiges r done . The only thing was She being uneducated and crass was very vOCAL about it while the educated moms like Sulo and Bhavna r diplomatically refined about their EXPECTATIONS . Sulo's MAJOR grouse against Manav was that He was a MECHANIC not an ENGINEER .
As far as her personal attraction towards jewellery or money goes , I put it down to her poverty .She never had the good things in life and was unashamed to admit she hankered for them .I see many HI society ladies hankering for jewllery inspite of being rich , its not at all UNCOMMON .
She took Sachu away from Shravani and is HENCE called a Baby snatcher . Did she go around snatching babies when her son was living , was she a PAGAL woman or a CRUEL one ? I don't think so naava . When did this obsession come in ? When her son died and when she took solace in his last souvenir . She clutched it and got the relief a pain killing tablet gives an incurable CANCER . The Cancer was SAchin who had gone and wud NEVER come back ..........the pain killing tablet was little Sachu who eased her pain temporarily and made her grief BEARABLE .
And btw if u blame the truck driver and Sachin's drunkenness for his death , then surely u will blame Shravani for GIVING up her son ..........nobody can snatch anything if the other person doesnt give it up .This same Shravani had IGNORED her tears and cries and succesfully walked away with little Sachu from the wedding Mandap upon her behest . Nobody CONSUMED Shravani ...........Shravani consumed HERSELF by relying too much on Manav , believing in his promises , not doing a thing inspite of being so rich , and later giving up her own son .
No way does she consume Little Sachu . Yes the grief crazed Grandma asked for him but he was ultimately discarded by his mother . She LOVES him and ADORES him . She wud lay down her LIFE for him . Or KILL for him . Sachu's unfortunate FATE consumes him .........His Dad died , his mom left him and the Duo who promised to be there for him when he was in his moms tummy is busy romancing each other and has OTHER PRIORITIES now and they too have forgotten him . A MOST ill fated child , our little Sachu . Thank God he has SAvita who at least GENUINELY loves him , coz Manav Kaka used him today in a dialogue only to get back at his mom . Manav Kaka didnt ONCE go to see him after marraige to Archana Kaki .
She does NOT want Manav only for HERSELF . Like she brought Shravanis rishta for SAchin , at a point she was ready to look for OTHER Rishtas for Manav . She only wanted Archana out . She wanted a nice rich girl whose family wud respect her and Manav . Actually this happened with Shravani later ..........the Mahadiks were nice and rich and respected Manav better than the Karanjkars do even at this point . I feel so ZAPPED to read the comments that she is SELFISH for being financially dependent on her son by many viewers . Its an INDIAN family in INDIA . That country is REPLETE with elder sons like Manav .........they r NOT being USED , what a petty way of looking at it this is ! No offense , this remark is for GENERAL , not for u . If a mom won't depend on a son for financial help then on whom will she depend on ........STRANGERS ? My Dad , the eldest son of his family took ALL responsibility of his Parents and his EIGHT siblings in the village by alone toiling in Mumbai , bringing each one here to have a job after he or she matriculated .The sisters were married off , the brothers were put in night college and a job was arranged for them . Thats the way it is . Why use such ugly words like his childhood was ripped off by his mom or that she used him . It is the Indian way . Bas . Her deep love for Manav is for ALL to see .
If Damodar and Manav don't feel that much grief and have moved on then evidently she has felt the loss more as a MOTHER . There was a time when I used precisely these words .........she plays the victim ..........but not anymore . I changed my mind . I write what I see and I did NOT see Damodar getting that deeply affected and Manav is always well controlled .
Her real beef with Archana is she cannot consume her u say .........I disagree . If she was THAT evil and THAT carnivorous as u say , She wud cleverly pretend to do SAMJHOTA with Archana and get her son in the house . Then when son left for work she cud set out to 'CONSUME" Archana as u put it , and trust me it wud be a VERY EASY TASK as Archana doesn't mind abuse when it is from selected people whom she allows . Like Manju coz she is her darling bro's wife so Archana gives her ETERNAL immunity and Savita coz she is her darling Manav's mom . Oh boy Savita can consume Archana in a jiffy if she PLANS it .........Archana is a CAKEWALK .
Girish's phone call was a result of the SPOILT prospects for his daughter in this proposal after the jailing that can be traced to Manjus complaint .Infact EVERY tragedy of Archana is traced back to that complaint . And Archana REFUSED to press charges against Manju when Savita asked her to prove her genuine repentance and by being in cahoots with her chamcha sasur who was ALWAYS on HER SIDE , she provided Manju anticipatory bail and SAVED her butt when finally Vandu pressed the charges .
Damodar may be an alcoholic but he HASN"T ever hit his children and loves them deeply . He was not a good financial provider thats all . So did Savita love ALL her 3 children deeply .Two of the children gew up with education too and they had a roof over their head , food on the table , both parents loved them and the elder responsible brother worked .Sounds like a SICK family to u ? Doesn't to me . The educated Sachin for a brief time was flrtatious and irresponsible but after meeting a nice gal , changed for the better . It was a nice , normal family . Hundreds of them in India . There was no domestic abuse there or the children wud NEVER turn out this good . Manav , Sachin and Vandita were as normal as Varshu , Vaishu and Vinod .
Savita wants to be in control u say and wants everything HER way u say .........Who DOESN"T ? Sulo didnt want Archu to marry Manav , she SLAPPED him , she INSISTED she marry Jaywant , Bhavana wants POTA whether Varsha is ready for it or not , Damodar DRINKS selfishly whether it increases Manavs burden or not , Archana selfishly came on Shravnis wedding day after her promises and divorces to check out if she had a chance with Manav still . Manav was USING Shravani to keep little Sachu in family and flirting with Archana . So why blame poor Savita for a very human tendency present in ALL in PR ? She has her reasons .
I too love u dear but I HAD to reply . Why wud I be offended by any kind of dialogue ? But ur right lets firmly agree to disagree and indeed the recipes r perhaps the areas where we will see eye to eye .😆😆😆
Health and Fitness
Fan Fictions
