Originally posted by: sowmya_jairam
Naava, I agree with everything you said. I want to add one more thing. Savita is the root cause for sachin's death. It was her greed for money. she wanted to get very rich daughter-in-law when she and her son is not worth 100rs. In real life girish would have got sachin beaten up instead of agreeing for the marriage. But girish agreed on one condition that his daughter goes away to us.
Savita is herself to blame (all the evil things she has done) for her condition today. Manav was right today, when he said "you don't love me". I am glad he finally realised it. Loosing manav who is her slave , money making machine made her go mental, which she never expected in her life.
I sympathise with her condition but don't feel bad for her.... MY POV
I hope they don't show manav feeling guilty for his mother's sickness. They should show him feeling bad and helping her though she never cared for his happiness actually try to ruin his happiness.
Who is to decide how much is a person's worth? How is a person's worth measured and by whom? And why is it wrong if somebody aspires to get more than their "worth"? Everybody should aspire to better and be more "worthy" according to me. Savita or Sachin did not cheat Shravani and Girish- they both knew about Deshmukh home environment and the people there. In real life, nobody would bring their souten with aarti while still married- girish accepting sachin is not as illogical and unreal as some other situations depicted in the show. She is greedy, yes. But does that mean and overshadow her love for her son? She was the one who defended him in front of everybody, when anybody else was with him or not. Even when Damodar and Archana in the beginning stood quiet listening to Manav being insulted, she stood by him. Like Kool said in her reply to the post, in India, sons are depended upon to look after parents. Its not like the West where a person starts earning and becomes independent as early as their teen years, and move out of parents house. Neither do DILs go to in-laws house after marriage. However, in India, sons still live with parents and bring their wives to parents house after marriage. In such scenarios, parents who are getting older and retire depend on sons income. It is prevalent and natural. In this case, Manav started earning from a very young age, but we're also talking about a lower middle class family living in a chawl with a father not having stead income.
No offense, but using words like slave and mental so callously is wrong. Manav has never been Savita's slave nor has Manav ever been only a money-making machine. She genuinely loves him is the truth, whatever are her other character defects. She is greedy and aggressive and all of those, but nobody's perfect. For that matter, Archana is also greedy for Manav's love and will do anything for it-including welcoming Shravan while still married, divorcing Manav when everybody including Savita didnt want her to, and then getting engaged to a guy she had no intention of truly committing herself to. They are just greedy for different things, and show it differently.
Manav should most definitely feel guilty for ignoring his mother. How much time does it take to go check up on her every day for 5 mins to let her know he still cares for her? Or even once in 2-3 days-just go and talk to her for a few mins, enquire about her well being and little Sachu. They even live in the same chawl. That is her biggest problem with Archana, that she has taken Savita's place in Manav's life. And Manav and Damodar have been emphasizing this point often. It is natural, if misdirected, for Savita to hate Archana who in her eyes has disrupted her life and taken her son and husband. And Manav is doing nothing to show her that he still loves her even after being married to Archana. Mother and wife are independent relations and have their own place and importance. One should not be so consumed by one bond that you forget the other, be it the mother or wife. Manav was wrong when he ingored Archana for his mother, and he's wrong now when he's ignoring his mother for Archana.
👏👏👏👏TOTALLY agree with ALL ur points , thank god I am spared from replying . WORTH ?😆😆😆😆 So Savita and her son have worth of 100 rs ? Are we talking AUKAAT here ? Like the Karanjkars ? Coz I don't believe in that concept at all ! Who are we to decide the worth of people ? I always attacked Sulochana coz she demeaned Manav for his POOR status ..............and btw by this logic of AUKAAT given here what was Archana's marraige market value then , coz she was a ninth standard educated girl ! Yet a decent educated rich guy like Satish had said YES to her proposal for she was a lovely , girl with good values ! Totally STUMPED by this thought process .