Raghav-Pallavi, a happy ending??? |DT P.2, 9 - Page 5

Originally posted by: -abz-

What to say? He is pious! Such a lovely lad! Rghav is the definition of purity. He's walking on burning charcoal only and only for Pallavi. But......with Esha at home.

#LoveLanguage

Who says he's pious? Who ever said he's an angel incarnation? The day he was established and appeared for the very first time on my screen, i knew this guy was all shades from grey to black!

Basically I knew I was signing up for TWO flawed characters! I was never expecting an ujala safedi male lead nor an all righteous female lead. I knew he would fall before he rise... I knew he will break before he mend... To learn you have to unlearn and that's not easy... Besides, I dont read individuals on one level according to one situation. I see the whole journey and not just a single loop. So what I have seen so far, appeals to me, if doesn't to anyone else, I gracefully will agree to disagree. Because I am entitled to my views just like you are entitled to yours.

And concept of idealism and perfection are perspective, subjective and illusionary. Ideal people are imaginary... They don't exist in real world!

Change and reformation are life long process lest Pallavi possessed a magic wand to turn his horns into wings after all!

I won't comment on his equation with Esha because display of contempt has been pretty clear and why she's still in the house is expressed by Amma.

Originally posted by: -abz-

I wish life was bed of roses. What can I do? My heart is breaking. 🥺

And roses don't exist without it's share of thorns, only if wishes were horses, ........ Sigh!!!

Originally posted by: joliefemme

Life isn't a bed of roses, you'll find more challenges and pain than happiness but with the support of a loving partner, life can be beautiful. If Raghav is repenting, he deserves a chance. Abhi if Pallavi believes in him and his love and his penance, she'll have it in her to accept him back.

We are heading for a happy ending and this show has literally validated all our feelings for these characters and what they think. I'm happy to have been proven right in assessing Raghvi.

I am glad Ren the leads are not twisted and changed in the course of 9 months that we have had this show. I like my characters for what they are, i.e., Humans!

My Pallavi wear different coloured glasses for different people in her life and family and come across as hypocrite... Be it! I love her because that's what we all do.

My Raghav is selfish and unapologetic for people he doesn't care and give two hoots about... So be it! He's true to his character.

This story was about creating perfection for two broken individuals out of the imperfections of their own lives. Two halves to make a full. Let it be be their perspective of perfection, it doesn't have to match mine. Because if they are happy, so am I.

Originally posted by: joliefemme

What is this love languages???? Tell me tell me I wanna know Fria.

It's basically how we want to be loved and how we give love to others. What kind of love do we value, what kind of love do we seek. Maybe I'll create a separate topic about it.

Originally posted by: euphoric

Who says he's pious? Who ever said he's an angel incarnation? The day he was established and appeared for the very first time on my screen, i knew this guy was all shades from grey to black!

Basically I knew I was signing up for TWO flawed characters! I was never expecting an ujala safedi male lead nor an all righteous female lead. I knew he would fall before he rise... I knew he will break before he mend... To learn you have to unlearn and that's not easy... Besides, I dont read individuals on one level according to one situation. I see the whole journey and not just a single loop. So what I have seen so far, appeals to me, if doesn't to anyone else, I gracefully will agree to disagree. Because I am entitled to my views just like you are entitled to yours.

And concept of idealism and perfection are perspective, subjective and illusionary. Ideal people are imaginary... They don't exist in real world!

Change and reformation are life long process lest Pallavi possessed a magic wand to turn his horns into wings after all!

I won't comment on his equation with Esha because display of contempt has been pretty clear and why she's still in the house is expressed by Amma.

The point is he didn't have to be an angel. He just didn't have to be a coward. He is still keeping that woman at home and expecting Pallavi to forgive him. If I was anybody close to Pallavi, I would have fought against the world to give him a divorce! She deserves better, period.

@Bold- That's such a crass thing to say considering why Pallavi left in the first place. He's just proving himself and I know they will give Raghvi a happily ever after cause that's how it is supposed to be according to the society that pushes a woman to reconcile with a disloyal man who does not give his wife the needed space to think.

This is exactly what a woman stuck in marriage goes through. Sad that people expect her to forgive than to understand what will cost her if she forgives. She has something called dignity and self respect.

Originally posted by: joliefemme

And roses don't exist without it's share of thorns, only if wishes were horses, ........ Sigh!!!

Thorns are those who try gaslight a person into agreeing. I'm happy being a human thank you.

Originally posted by: unicornwriter

I know right!!!

You can get attached even to a non living thing but it's not necessary to love it 😂😂

If someone gets attached to the idea of someone living around them and breathing, buddy run 😂😂 it's Netflix ka YOU Season 4 for you now 😂😂.

Attachment toh aapko alcohol aur drugs se bhi hota hai and that is toxic. Didi usko pyaar nhin bol skte 😂😂

Exactly!

Attachment comes from insecurities that we know Raghav has. He needs a therapist. Pallavi is not one. 🤪

Originally posted by: -abz-

Thorns are those who try gaslight a person into agreeing. I'm happy being a human thank you.

You find all kinds of people in this world, the ones who gaslight, the ones who bully, the ones who are kind, ones who are forgiving, ones who repent after their mistakes, ones who are selfish, ones who are selfless etc.

None of these make them any less humans. Life main nothing is black or white, everything is grey. No human being is perfect (doesn't make mistakes or doesn't sin), everyone has flaws and everyone makes mistakes, that is what makes them HUMAN.

Originally posted by: -abz-

Exactly!

Attachment comes from insecurities that we know Raghav has. He needs a therapist. Pallavi is not one. 🤪

Pallavi should have taken psychology as a subject during college 😂😂 aaj atleast kaam toh aata warna bechari kahan kathak main post graduation krna tha aur kahan therapist aur bina degree ki fashion designer ban gayi hai 😂😂

Originally posted by: -abz-

The point is he didn't have to be an angel. He just didn't have to be a coward. He is still keeping that woman at home and expecting Pallavi to forgive him. If I was anybody close to Pallavi, I would have fought against the world to give him a divorce! She deserves better, period.

@Bold- That's such a crass thing to say considering why Pallavi left in the first place. He's just proving himself and I know they will give Raghvi a happily ever after cause that's how it is supposed to be according to the society that pushes a woman to reconcile with a disloyal man who does not give his wife the needed space to think.

This is exactly what a woman stuck in marriage goes through. Sad that people expect her to forgive than to understand what will cost her if she forgives. She has something called dignity and self respect.

Just because he has abandonment issues doesn't make him a coward. It's his issues that he keeps fighting with. He was mustering up courage to tell her... Not sure if you have seen the episodes but he did try telling her... Infact he did confess but she didn't hear. The day she found out, he had resolved to confess and face the consequences.

There's a difference of intent over here. He wasn't actively cheating. Emotionally manipulated, yes! He was not a consensual partner that night.

Pallavi is no docile damsel in distress to begin with to be stuck in a toxic marriage. Thank God for that!

And if I had someone like Pallavi as a close associate I would rather let them take their own decision instead force my opinions on them. I would support the choice irrespective of the fact if it's reconciliation or divorce. Afterall, she has to live her life and the aftermath of her decision not me, so who am I to judge.