If a murderer gets stabbed and is then used to advocate the cause of rising violence in society, does that nullify their original crime because they are the "victim" now? Or does it cheapen the entire issue with the obvious inherent hypocrisy of this entire premise?
This is the greatest problem with this track. When you make a perpetrator into prey just to sensationalize a 'hot' topic it takes away from the credibility of the issue itself. By the very nature of the character itself, all audience sympathy was anyway absent. When you impose a social angle onto an already skewed perspective, there is no possible way to make a successful connect for even the most sensitive of viewers.
What happened with Mukti was wrong. But what she did, has been doing all this while(without remorse) and will most probably continue doing even after this tamasha is over is also just as wrong. By inappropriately portraying her as the mascot for an issue she is no way accurately represents, all you end up doing is trolling and belittling the very cause you are (unsuccessfully) attempting to uphold.
How demeaning and unfair this is to the real, innocent victims who have suffered through no fault of their own and yet are still the ones to be blamed for their plight.
Please let's not toy with their dignity and self-respect in the name of pseudo social activism.
Very poorly done CVs and Channel.
A disappointed fan.