Hi, Tarunsingh,As I hv already mentioned,in my post, I am not a history expert, but ardent lover of history. I am greatful to each one of the member of the history forum of JO-ak who added to my knowledge without getting irritated Having said that expertcy in any subject is different frm loving a subject, just as having a child is no saboot of love as Radhika said.It is possible to bear a child without loving that person. Similarly even after intense love the couple may be childless due to medical reasons. i can't comprahend a time where hakim sahiba had to be called fr confirmation of pregnancy. If at all, it is the pregnant lady who should be the first person to know that 1. she is prgnant. 2. by whom This drama was being held in the old movies fr audience' sake which is being carried over in the serial.Coming to the point, late pregnancy of Jodha could be due to medical reasons, or due to the upheaval in their relationship, or due to war factor,Or it may also be due to the combination of all .Tarunsingh, pregnancy,is such a thing that till today, the doctors don't hv sureshot answer,fr not concieving in some cases.😕
2. As far as social reforms of akbar r concerned, the answer lies in ur post itself, wherein u hv mentioned that till today the child marriagge has not been abolished. If this is the case in time of electronics, then how can u expect the same in those days?If at all we want to appriciate,it should be fr the bold steps taken by the ruler.n whether the honest attempts were made to implement them. U may remember, Akbar went against the Moulvis in his attempt at reforms Having said that, I am in no way in favour of glorifieing Akbar I too want to ask history-geek if Akbar really was a ruthless king at the age of 13? He has been portrayed as one in the serial Maharana Pratap which is natural as he is not a protagonist there.I hv read all his thread n loved them especilly the lighter way in which he explains the things.👍🏼👏
3.I could not understand the point u wanted to make in the Khsrau incident which is a blot in the history.Don't u see the sons going to the court against their father in inheritaance cases in today's bussiness world?It depends on the grittiness of the woman, how she grins n bears it or gives in to that pressure😭 I think it was shahjahan who was known to be romantic because of Tazmahal But he was not less cruel than Aurangzeb as he killed all his brothers n uncles fr the sake of throne.😲 he continued romancing with other queens (unlike shown in the movie )even after the death of Mumtaaz.It is an irony that we remember him only as a rimantic king, whereas he shud hv been regarded as another aurangzeb.😡
4. Lastly havn't u seen the disclaimer?😛 how can a serial with such a controvercial subject run fr 7 years just to show Salim born😆They can say in a dialogue that 7 years passed, which they will not do because of 'uchit natakiya roopantar'. I agree that makers hv botched upwith not one but many a things, including chronology,holi being the fvrt subject of all😉👎🏼 But as long as we come to know abt the correct things thru abhay n co.(special regards to myviewprem,donjas, Ela ), I can just laugh it away.
127