Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
It's not a theory. Tamil IS older than Sanskrit. The oldest Tamil inscription is from 3rd century BCE while oldest Sanskrit inscription is from 1st century BCE.
Also, Tamil nationalism and Tamil language movement are intertwined, but they're not the same.
And yes, Tamil language movement did start because people were trying to *impose* Hindi. It's a part of recorded history. Tamilians did not have that problem with English. They don't even now. The issue is the forcing of Hindi on a population which doesn't want it.
Casting the language movement as the same as the national movement is not accurate.
No, that's just propaganda expounded by some hardcore Dravidian groups. It has no basis in history and any proof to such claims is hotly debated.
Even is Tamil is older in terms of writing, Sanskrit texts which were passed on orally was much older. They were written down in 1500 BCE. The oral traditions continued much earlier.
Also, the claim of Indus Valley scripts is completely baseless, since those haven't yet been deciphered yet.
Also, the zeal to protect and keep the Tamil language 'pure' from all outside influence dated way, way back before 1965. The language has even undergone several purges to remove Sanskrit loan words from the script. They associate Hindi with the Aryan group, who (according to them) are the perpetual enemies of the Dravidians. Here Hindi is not merely a language. It's a representative of linguistic and racial imperialism.
The issue is much, much, much more complex. It's not simply about 'Hindi imposition'.
0