SRK's explanation for 90s heroines not getting work is unconvincing

ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#1

Shah Rukh Khan's Explanation For 90s Heroines Not Getting Work Today Is Pretty Unconvincing

Not buying it.

18/01/2017 4:58 PM IST | Updated 18/01/2017 6:02 PM IST
AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Shah Rukh Khan started his career in the late 80s, dominated the industry in the 90s, 00s and continues to rule the roost even now.

Some of his leading ladies -- Madhuri Dixit, Juhi Chawla, and Kajol to name a few -- were instrumental in propelling him to superstardom, but couldn't last as long as he managed to.

The simple explanation for this is Bollywood's patriarchal hangover and deep-rooted sexism that doesn't allow women who slip into their mid-30s and early 40s to continue as mainstream actresses.

While there have been exceptions, like in the cases of Tabu, Sridevi, and Shabana Azmi, the same cannot be said about a host of other talented actresses - say Urmila Matondkar, Preity Zinta, Shilpa Shetty, who have been reduced to judging reality shows, while Shah Rukh, Salman, and Aamir continue to romance women less than half their age.

When Femina magazine asked Khan what he thinks about this issue, he blamed it on 'market forces.'

"Films are an art; you can call it art that is tacky, fantastic, offbeat, edgy, superb, not-understandable - but it's art. Yet, this art is not based on how beautiful the outcome is, like how a Monalisa is judged purely on her smile. Market forces define the art of cinema. A majority of the audience wants to see younger people. People define what they want to watch and the filmmakers follow suit."

What Shah Rukh really wants to say but is shying away from saying is: A majority of the audience wants to see younger women.

Which in itself is debatable and is obviously not research-based.

Kajol, Preity, Rani didn't disappear from the screens because 'audiences didn't want to see them.'

They did so because filmmakers replaced them with Priyanka, Deepika, and Katrina while ensuring that a steady stream of work trickles down for the Khans.

Whenever these heroines were offered work, they stood out and the audience responded enthusiastically, whether it was Rani in Mardani or Madhuri in Dedh Ishqiya or even a Sridevi in English Vinglish.

Sounding awfully patronizing, Khan added in the same interview, "Madhuri, Juhi, and Kajol are such beautiful women and wonderful actors. I'm a star because of them; they've taught me all that I know. Whenever I can, I try to get them to act in my movies. But we have to realize that this is a business at the end of the day, however much you may think it's a creative field. It pays the bills. It's a dichotomy in many ways."

That isn't entirely true either. Juhi Chawla has repeatedly mentioned in interviews that she'd like to work with Khan again but her last appearance in an SRK movie was a fleeting cameo in a song (Deewangi, Om Shanti Om) that had 15 other heroines.

The power structure in Bollywood, as is the case with many other industries, is biased towards men as it rests with them. And that's precisely what leads to a career imbalance between genders. It's the decisions taken by the powerful men that end up deciding the shelf-life of an actress.

Shah Rukh Khan, a powerful star and a movie producer, is in a position to change that paradigm and perhaps, he should work towards being more inclusive.

But some of our stars remain blissfully unaware of the real issue or at least pretend to.

In an interview with this writer for the Wall Street Journal, Salman Khan, when asked what he thinks of the gender disparity in Bollywood, had said there isn't an issue of sexism in the industry. "I don't feel that the industry has treated anyone badly," he had said.

A good start in the right direction would be to acknowledge the problem where it lies instead of deflecting the blame and putting it on the audience or worse, pretending that it doesn't exist at all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/18/shah-rukh-khans-explanation-for-90s-heroines-not-getting-work-t/

Created

Last reply

Replies

81

Views

10.3k

Users

41

Likes

111

Frequent Posters

1105912 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
Sorry but he sounded extremely sexist and ageist when he made that statement 🥱
Edited by flameofdarkness - 8 years ago
643898 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
Well what the last movie with a 90s heroine as a lead actress which did huge business ?

263437 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#4
SRK-Kajol were accepted in Dilwale by the audience. The film didn't quite work for other reasons.
When did he take older actresses in his films otherwise to make such sexist comments?
Johnny.Balraj thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#5
He is right
This is how it is and actresses do have a short career.
Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#6
He is merely talking about reality.. he's not being sexist IMO.
But.. that's not the way SRK, boond boond se sagar banta hai, keep trying, some one else will see you and get inspired to do the same and it'll have a chain reaction. These are just politics, and politics change when a person changes his stand - may take a while, but you can try being a KHAN.







Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#7
Actually, after giving it a thought, there are no fitting movie plots to take aged actresses in movies.. and whenever there are, they are being roped in.. like Tabu in Haider, for example. Someone also was in MSD, I forgot. Lara Dutaa too was in some movie...and so on.

Aishwarya was taken in ADHM, she's a 90s actress.. but most of the commercial movies involve silly love stories with faltu movie plots where I think it would indeed look odd seeing a 40 year old. There should be a fitting plot too, what I mean to say is. When a 50 year old Khan plays a 50 year old in the movie, then a 40 year old actress can be cast alongside him... otherwise it looks weird. He himself plays a 30 odd or something and a man chasing after 20-something.


Actually I do not think they are not being given a chance. But it is actually the stupid movie making that cannot use - cast a 40 year old actresses in a proper way.

Movie making is at fault.
Edited by Angel-likeDevil - 8 years ago
Rekha_ji thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Jupiters_Cock

Well what the last movie with a 90s heroine as a lead actress which did huge business ?


Dilwale (a year ago) with Kajol.

Aishwarya was offered Happy New Year but she turned it down because Abhishek was also doing the movie.

I don't think there's been any other recent film which could've had Juhi or Madhuri or Sridevi, which is a shame.
JustMySelf thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#9
srk at least is being defensively honest n truthful ..
bt salman had asked juhi to play his mother ..that
answer was more befitting right?😆
all the comeback movies how much did they earn?
simple thing is madhuri rani had their audience..now
those audience themselves must be family men women
n new gen u cnt expect to choose rani over alia..same way
a day will come when next gen will tell alia move aside..it is
how nature works ..replace the older one with the new fancy
only hypocrites will tell age does nt mater..it bloody hell matters..




807116 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#10
Problem lies with the historical narratives/stories, we have been hearing from our childhood. Prince fell in love with a princess/commoner, then they got married and lived happily ever after.
Though our scripts went beyond Cinderella times (leads are not prince or princess), skeleton of these narratives still remain same. Invariably, all stories end by both getting hooked (when the character's age is below thirty).

When they can go beyond this horizon (they lived happily ever after), a new story can emerge. But it needs a good writing skills. A good writer can subtlety show, how Shashi's mind wavered for a second before settling in English Vinglish. A pathetic director like KJo can create, all on your face (without logic); Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna.

As for sellability of a product, I am not sure whether female lead's age makes any difference. (But I agree, no female can bring crowd like Khans). SRK's Dilwale had similar collection compared to his other hits with younger heroines. Amir's Dangal (with Sakshi) had the same crowd as PK with Anushka.
Edited by flipfl0p - 8 years ago

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: woodland · 5 months ago

https://postimg.cc/Yjp9pDH7...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 5 months ago

Who is the prettiest from these women? And do you think the colour given to them was their iconic colour in films?...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Sultan.Mirza · 6 months ago

We often come across films with more than one hero or heroine, and there seems to be favoritism or biased behavior towards some. Sharing some...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 11 days ago

Rashmika clarifies about not having fixed work hours- Deepika debate...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".