Blast From The Past: Saif Leaves Amrita Singh - Page 10

Created

Last reply

Replies

159

Views

18.3k

Users

43

Likes

504

Frequent Posters

ViccoTurmeric thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#91
I dont know how much to trust the article... I know the bitterness Sharmila had toward Amrita and can believ what article says about that but HOW ON EARTH CAN A FATHER NEGLECT His Own Blood!??? Is he so stone hearted that he didnt even give him finicial support!??? - It seems so bitter and so unbelivable
On other hand, there were several occasions when Saif was dating Rose and he was spotted with Sara and his son... I dont belive what article is saying about his neglance!
SingularlyGood thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#92

Originally posted by: anonymous39

No, he was not obligated by the law to provide anything until the courts settled the divorce and split the assets. The actual divorce process can end up taking a long time, sometimes even years! During that intervening time, there are really no rules and it turns into a free for all. Some people refuse to provide money, some people refuse to allow access to the children, and all sorts of stuff occurs.


This is the time frame where custody has not been granted yet and alimony has not been decided. This stuff takes a long time. Once everything was signed on paper, Amrita did get child support from Saif. She also got the house they used to live in and he got joint custody of the kids. Amrita stopped working a long time ago because she started getting money from Saif for child care needs and probably alimony for herself too. She was only working and getting monetary help (from Sanjay Dutt?) while the divorce was still in court and she was waiting for everything to be legalized.

Of course he should not have been a jerk and helped her out during that time in the middle when everything was not down on paper. But that's life. I also take all the stuff that comes in the papers with a grain of salt. Each side tries to make the other one look bad.

Amrita would have gotten him arrested if he was breaking laws or doing something illegal. It's not that simple. Morally, of course SAif was a creep, nobody is really denying that. But legally, he wasn't really doing anything wrong at the time. If he was, Amrita would have made sure to get him in a lot of trouble.

\

Not necessarily. In USA, A court can issue a temporary order of child support to the parent responsible for the child's care. A temporary order stays in effect until the court enters a permanent support order in the final judgment of divorce. I am not sure whether such provisions exist in India. However, even if Saif was not legally bound to provide for his children, his moral bearings must have been really shoddy to leave his two minor children with their non-working mom without any monetary support. Especially, considering the fact that it was HE who cheated and who probably wanted to get out of the marriage. Amrita could have been a shrew or a hell-cat, the divorce could have been as messy as hell comes, his moral obligations towards his children shouldn't have to be dictated by legal rulings.
d-_-b thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#93
I don't see the point in arguing whether Saif is legally obligated to take care of his kids. He is morally obligated. PERIOD. If he ceases to take care of his kids for even a day, he is morally corrupt.
739801 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#94
joke on saif and kareena.

kareena had a baby, but the born was born black, Saif was shocked...he said to kareena. main gora, tu gori, to baccha kaise kala.

kareena said. tu bhi hot main bhi bot

jal gaya sala
745671 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#95
But you're missing the point, blue-ice. Saif did and does provide child support money. He probably gives alimony too because Amrita has not gotten married again. She also got the house in her name. It's obvious she's fine financially because she's no longer working and stopped a long time ago.

Things do get messy during the divorce process. About the joint account- who knows, it's not like we know full details of what goes on in someone else's life. Most likely, Saif was advised by his lawyers to freeze it. It's a common procedure in a divorce. Relying on media so much still won't tell us everything especially when both sides are trying to throw mud at the other one to appear better in public.

If Amrita didn't have money to provide for the kids, all she had to do was send them to Saif to live with him. If he lived with them, he would have obviously had to take care of them and he would have. She wanted to keep them to herself so she started working and finding a way to pay for things. Even Saif had to rely on her to let her see them. There was nothing legal down on paper yet so she had a lot of control over access to the children just like Saif had control over the money.

Again, nobody is excusing Saif morally. He was jerk for cheating, he was a jerk through the divorce process as well. But it was not illegal and he was not breaking laws. He was just waiting for things to be legalized on paper before he gave her the money which makes sense in a financial and legal way if not in a moral way.

And btw, I don't think it was such a cruel thing that Amrita had to start working. What's the big deal in being a working mother? It's natural that you have to stand up on your own two feet now that you're single again. She was well provided for financially in the divorce anyway; it's just that it took time to work itself out as the divorce process is pretty long.

Also, the kids look quite happy with Saif. They even get along with Kareena. They were important parts of the wedding. If he was such a bad father, they would have held a lot more grudges. He was a horrible husband but I don't think he's that bad a dad. He's made mistakes of course but I don't think it's as horrible as people sometimes make it seem.
Edited by anonymous39 - 12 years ago
739801 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#96

that's the way to go my UNELEASHED. no one can owe you 😉 now will you pls reply my PM !
qwww thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#97
Such a scumbag. I have never warmed up to this guy for this reason. He was not 20 when the divorce happened. He had money to romance his mistress and shower her with expensive gifts and vacations but choose not to pay for his kids well being. I don't think he ever sought custody.
Btw why are grandparents brought in here ? Kids are the responsibility of the parents period. In this case one parent did whatever she had to for her kids sake and other chose to be the spiteful ex who would punish his chi
Dren to get back at his ex.
Yeah yeah I know Amrita is no saint but Saif is a crummy father.
Posted: 12 years ago
#98
saif's daughter was almost 10yrs old then...n his son 3yrs. thats the saddest part for me. if not responsibility, didn he feel any love for them to not provide them financially? 10yrs is pretty long time to form an emotional bond with your child. 😔 if there is even little truth to this article, then well educated, well settled, well read saif is just an image.
NoThanks thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#99
Royalty goes down the drain some way or the other every year.
👎🏼
853244 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: anonymous39

But you're missing the point, blue-ice. Saif did and does provide child support money. He probably gives alimony too because Amrita has not gotten married again. She also got the house in her name. It's obvious she's fine financially because she's no longer working and stopped a long time ago.


Things do get messy during the divorce process. About the joint account- who knows, it's not like we know full details of what goes on in someone else's life. Most likely, Saif was advised by his lawyers to freeze it. It's a common procedure in a divorce. Relying on media so much still won't tell us everything especially when both sides are trying to throw mud at the other one to appear better in public.

If Amrita didn't have money to provide for the kids, all she had to do was send them to Saif to live with him. If he lived with them, he would have obviously had to take care of them and he would have. She wanted to keep them to herself so she started working and finding a way to pay for things. Even Saif had to rely on her to let her see them. There was nothing legal down on paper yet so she had a lot of control over access to the children just like Saif had control over the money.

Again, nobody is excusing Saif morally. He was jerk for cheating, he was a jerk through the divorce process as well. But it was not illegal and he was not breaking laws. He was just waiting for things to be legalized on paper before he gave her the money which makes sense in a financial and legal way if not in a moral way.

And btw, I don't think it was such a cruel thing that Amrita had to start working. What's the big deal in being a working mother? It's natural that you have to stand up on your own two feet now that you're single again. She was well provided for financially in the divorce anyway; it's just that it took time to work itself out as the divorce process is pretty long.

Also, the kids look quite happy with Saif. They even get along with Kareena. They were important parts of the wedding. If he was such a bad father, they would have held a lot more grudges. He was a horrible husband but I don't think he's that bad a dad. He's made mistakes of course but I don't think it's as horrible as people sometimes make it seem.



So what are you exactly saying here, Saif was morally wrong but legally right?

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 5 months ago

Mona Singh praises Aamir Khan on Laal Singh Chaddha failure party https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIlJjgTzoBt/?igsh=MXFsMHZ2OXY5YjliaA==

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: khan.baba · 1 months ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjyawlUAMEM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjyawlUAMEM
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: beena_jon · 1 months ago

This Independence Day weekend is set for a thunderous clash at the Indian box office. On one side is Coolie, starring the evergreen superstar...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue · 4 months ago

Between 2002 and 2006 , Amrita Rao was everywhere — not in the overexposed, media-manufactured way, but through genuinely memorable...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 5 months ago

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/akshay-kumar-and-saif-ali-khan-reunite-onscreen-after-17-years-since-tashan_221597

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".