Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 20th Sep 2025 - WKV
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: India vs Oman, 12th Match, Group A at Abu Dhabi🏏
Deepika starts shooting for King
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 20, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
🏏 Asia Cup 2025: Sri Lanka vs Bangladesh, Super Four, Match 1 Dubai🏏
Anupamaa 20 -24 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Downfall is Real! No one even cares for SPA pics this year
Book Talk Reading Challenge & Book Bingo ~ Oct 2025 Sign up open!
Star Parivaar Ki Favourite Saas
Related new fanfics
HONEYMOON🏩 20th and 21.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 21, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Homebound - OSCARS 2026 Official Indian Entry
Akshay Kumar Is Back To Giving Hits
H-1B Visa Crisis: Families Forced to Return, Futures at Stake
Chunkey Panday happiest for Ahaan’s success (Saiyaara)
Tabu likes a reel shading Deepika on Instagram
👻😈😈😈Mask Of Zorro😈😈😈👻
24 years of Ajnabee
🏏India vs Pakistan, Asia Cup-Super Four, Match 14 (A1 v A2) Dubai🏏
Originally posted by: soap-critic
The topic of this thread is about Santu's decision. Somewhere along the way it got derailed to judging Hiten and Khemi's behaviour instead of judging Santu's decision.
I am putting the track back to the original topic by putting in my 2 cents. I do not agree with the way Santu took the decision and justified it to Khemi. When she went to talk to Nanaji why did she not take Khemi along with her and have a joint family discussion? This way both of them could have heard her out. It was after all about Khemi's marraige.
After that Santu did not let Hiten finish whatever it was that he wanted to tell her. If she made the decision in her role as maalkin shouldn't the parties involved be given an opportunity to be heard? And shouldn't the maalik be made aware of what is going the situation? If Santu involved Nanaji as a parent then isn't it DM's right to know as Hiten's father too?
Khemi has already told Santu that she will not be able to forget Hiten and accept Shambhu. A just and fair decision should involve Shambhu too. Why did she not go talk and bring him to the haveli and have a talk with DM present? She is experiencing first hand what it is like to have a spouse whose heart belongs to someone else. Why does she think it would be OK for Shambhu to be in the same situation?
DM has been married twice - the first time to a woman he loved very much and whom he still loves after her death and the second time in a forced marraige to a young girl he is barely beginning to acknowledge in his life but not give her the rights of his wife. He has experienced both types of scenarios. He would have been very angry at first but DM is a just and fair man. He would definitely have heard everyone out before giving his decision.
Santu's unilateral decision was wrong on so many fronts. If Santu had gone about taking the decision in the right way matters would not have come to this stage. The necklace would still be locked in DM's safe.
Coming to the maanglik issue, if only maangliks can marry each other, not many in the country would find a match. Ther aer ways around to getting around the maanglik-non-maanglik. A famous couple who have that problem in the entertainment industry is Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bacchan. They had got her to marry a pepal tree (or was it a banana tree) before marrying him. This is supposed to ward off whatever problem that would come in their union. So a similar thing can be done for Khemi too.
Originally posted by: soap-critic
The topic of this thread is about Santu's decision. Somewhere along the way it got derailed to judging Hiten and Khemi's behaviour instead of judging Santu's decision.
I am putting the track back to the original topic by putting in my 2 cents. I do not agree with the way Santu took the decision and justified it to Khemi. When she went to talk to Nanaji why did she not take Khemi along with her and have a joint family discussion? This way both of them could have heard her out. It was after all about Khemi's marraige.
After that Santu did not let Hiten finish whatever it was that he wanted to tell her. If she made the decision in her role as maalkin shouldn't the parties involved be given an opportunity to be heard? And shouldn't the maalik be made aware of what is going the situation? If Santu involved Nanaji as a parent then isn't it DM's right to know as Hiten's father too?
Khemi has already told Santu that she will not be able to forget Hiten and accept Shambhu. A just and fair decision should involve Shambhu too. Why did she not go talk and bring him to the haveli and have a talk with DM present? She is experiencing first hand what it is like to have a spouse whose heart belongs to someone else. Why does she think it would be OK for Shambhu to be in the same situation?
DM has been married twice - the first time to a woman he loved very much and whom he still loves after her death and the second time in a forced marraige to a young girl he is barely beginning to acknowledge in his life but not give her the rights of his wife. He has experienced both types of scenarios. He would have been very angry at first but DM is a just and fair man. He would definitely have heard everyone out before giving his decision.
Santu's unilateral decision was wrong on so many fronts. If Santu had gone about taking the decision in the right way matters would not have come to this stage. The necklace would still be locked in DM's safe.
I know I loved Hiten today, the Hiten I have always seen and admired well finally got to see him again today! 😃 I was so happy how he acted today, love it when he's angry man, he looks so godamn cute ☺️ His reply was really good, I was like go Hiten go Hiten 😆Originally posted by: vasantha_rao07
I absolutely loved the way Hiten gave a reply to the Maalkin!!!!!!!😈 the lady had no words😆
I want to see this Hiten ..not the silent statue wallah..with tears...whY do BT men r also shown crying so profusely