Is anandi failing Shivam too?

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

40

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#121

Definitely looks like DB is writing the scenes nowadays😛😆 They could have just shown that discontent happening because of kids and both families needing more space. That stupid holi scenes between J and A was unnecessary unless they want juxtapose current Jagya Anandi who are just friends as opposed to the other couple who are the current balika vadhu and balak var

1

Reply

Quote

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

33

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

#122

They have reinvented DB in the form of Akhera's wife, a cruder version.

DB is the city slicker while the other lady is village crudity in all its glory.

They are showing that getting burnt is heroic.

I just cant understand how can a small girl eat so many laddoos even if she was very hungry?

1

Reply

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

40

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#123

Little girl must be burning away calories😆

She is so playful wants to have fun.Doesn't seem to stay still

Plus she is forced to work and as well as starved

So it is not surprising that she is hungry.

------------

Did she eat all the laddoos? Wonder how many were there in the first place😕

Didn't watch those scenes carefully

I distract myself while Nandini's scenes are on😛😆

-----------

This Akheda and his wife characters and their behaviour doesn't make sense to me.

------------

I think Nandini is not being heroic - trying to make light of her sufferings because that's the only kind of life she has experienced and she doesn't know how different life can be.She doesn't even know that she can get herself out of that life.She is too young to know that.

In those circumstances all these marks of sufferings become badges - It's like saying luk I survived this.If I can live to tell the tale of my sufferings I can take some more and still live to tell the stories.

Taking pride in those burnt scars - is like telling look you can do all this but still can't break me.

1

Reply

Quote

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

33

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

#124

I think the laddoos were around 15. Or more.

1

Reply

Quote

Stalwart.

@Stalwart.

Inactive

16

Posted: 10 years ago

#125

Even I was surprised seeing her eat all those laddoos. But leaving her lanturn near laddoo jar...that was really stupid!

1

Reply

Quote

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

33

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

#126

She could have eaten 3 laddoos and that would not have raised any suspicions. And she could have hidden that lantern.

But then we would not have seen how stoic she was.

1

Reply

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

40

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#127

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
She could have eaten 3 laddoos and that would not have raised any suspicions. And she could have hidden that lantern.

But then we would not have seen how stoic she was.

I think she was so hungry and desperate to get something to eat her brains worked only till the time she managed to get something to eat😆

Satisfying hunger is the pressing need and she shouldn't get caught before she eats something and after she got food in her stomach didn't really care about anything else typical shortsightedness of kids.

Had she been an adult deprived of food she peobably would have hidden the lantern.

-------

If they showed her polishing off around 15 laddos in one go that is a bit of exaggeration😆

1

Reply

Quote

prisha

@prishadbest

Explorer

5

Posted: 10 years ago

#128

Originally posted by: aparnauma

I think she was so hungry and desperate to get something to eat her brains worked only till the time she managed to get something to eat😆

Satisfying hunger is the pressing need and she shouldn't get caught before she eats something and after she got food in her stomach didn't really care about anything else typical shortsightedness of kids.

Had she been an adult deprived of food she peobably would have hidden the lantern.
-------
If they showed her polishing off around 15 laddos in one go that is a bit of exaggeration😆

I really find the scenes of Akheras singh's house too over the top, nandini was not even a child when they kidnapped, her, she was just a baby, so supposedly they have literally brought her up. Bringing up a child and not having any feelings for her, is practically not possible.This family seems to be inhumanity redefined, and i think no child even the bravest will show off the burn scars as a trophy. Did this torture start post the leap and all was fine in the past 11 years, because the kid reacts as if everything is happening for the first time, please stop this crap track

3

Reply

Quote

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

25

Posted: 10 years ago

#129

Originally posted by: prishadbest

I really find the scenes of Akheras singh's house too over the top, nandini was not even a child when they kidnapped, her, she was just a baby, so supposedly they have literally brought her up. Bringing up a child and not having any feelings for her, is practically not possible.This family seems to be inhumanity redefined, and i think no child even the bravest will show off the burn scars as a trophy. Did this torture start post the leap and all was fine in the past 11 years, because the kid reacts as if everything is happening for the first time, please stop this crap track

@bold - that is what I mentioned in some other thread that the girl does not looks tortured. People say she inherited good looks from her parents. It is not about just good looks - a child, who has been tortured for years together will never look so good - in looks and in behaviour. Nandini's behaviour is so normal and she does not have even one scar - the burning scar on her hand will vanish in a few episodes😆. They should have made it like the family hated her always - but the physical torture started only now. Then it could become believable. But they show a girl like any other girl of her age - roaming in house fearlessly, in holi scene - she ate laddo without any restriction, is not even doing household work unlike Anandi (her sasuma was cooking on chulha) and then show that she was always tortured?

1

Reply

Quote

prisha

@prishadbest

Explorer

5

Posted: 10 years ago

#130

@bold - that is what I mentioned in some other thread that the girl does not looks tortured. People say she inherited good looks from her parents. It is not about just good looks - a child, who has been tortured for years together will never look so good - in looks and in behaviour. Nandini's behaviour is so normal and she does not have even one scar - the burning scar on her hand will vanish in a few episodes😆. They should have made it like the family hated her always - but the physical torture started only now. Then it could become believable. But they show a girl like any other girl of her age - roaming in house fearlessly, in holi scene - she ate laddo without any restriction, is not even doing household work unlike Anandi (her sasuma was cooking on chulha) and then show that she was always tortured?

🤣

the character of Nimboli is a big joke, as i had said earlier, flawless make up, beautiful clothes, no house work, no school, no bonding with Kundan, with whom she is supposedly grown up, guess her entire time is gone trying to look sweet and innocent like avika (inspiration).

And now Kundan will try to force himself on her, logically why would a child who has been brainwashed right from her toddler days that she is a married girl oppose this,it would normally be accepted by a 11-12 year old who knows that Kundan is her husband and rebelling against this will be out of character for someone who even accepts burn marks as a trophy. I find this tracking truly disgusting, God knows what the CV's are trying toshow...

Edited by prishadbest - 10 years ago

1

Reply

Quote

Is anandi failing Shivam too? - Page 13

Related Topics

Explore Topics