I cant understand y they are making mala this much good ? - Page 5

Originally posted by: Zeeliciousxo

I think what the person is saying that Dilsher was pretty much kind to Paro even before he really knew her. He was good to her from their first meeting, let's be real, he didn't change suddenly in one meeting because as soon as he met Paro he sensed all this goodness in her.

Originally posted by: aarthi.msp

The situation would have been different if Tejawat was really a good ideal husband. But no, Mala was wrong in judging. She ended up with him. She had tried all her means dear. The only reason she stepped back to the haveli is because to have a glimpse of her son during his marriage. If she never cared for him she wouldn't come back to see him again then. She felt awkward as to how will she explain her situation to him as her son is also a MAN. She knew that her son will never accept his mother as she left for another guy. He is very possessive. So as any child he would like to have a perfect family with his father and mother.

Though Rudra was around 13-14 yrs he doesn't know that his mother was being abused by his father. Maybe if they had been together also some point of time he might have fought for his mother after knowing her real plight. Either ways Rudra is a victim if Mala had tried to take him away with her or she staying alone with Rudra or she continued living with Dilsher. As Rudra rightly asked if u cannot handle things why to give birth to him who has lost his childhood, happiness, innocence.

Lets be realistic here for a second, the villain did NOT, I repeat did not hate the child at that stage, because he was not yet a bsd officer set out to ruin the villain, so if he was so much in love with her as we first saw in the screenplay then she could have asked him for his help in capturing her child, and remember it is only recently she found out he is evil, so how can you tell me that she made a wrong choice on the villain as a second husband, because at that time 15 years ago according to her she made the right choice in leaving her abusive husband to be with her poet lover and leaving her child with the said abusive husband. Even though her poet lover was so much in love with her that he married her, made her his queen, took her to his castle where she lived blissfully for the last 15 years with him.

And the only reason she came back is because the brother-in-law called her and told her that her son came back to the castle. Not her own initiative to find him, even after all this time. Please she knows his full name how hard can it be. And how does she know if she never give her son a chance if he will accept another man, if she thought that why would she have wanted to steal him pray tell. NO because she didn't think that, or she wouldn't have made her couple of half-baked attempts in front of her husband's eyes to steal the kid.😕

Hear it from someone who comes from a family where parents are separated. Children always know, my brother and I knew it where we were five, 10, 18 and now we are in our 20s we always knew. Children are very preceptive they might block somethings out because of trauma unable to deal with it but in the subconscious level it always exists the truth is always known.