Why is RangRasiya not working- from TRP perspective?? - Page 11

Originally posted by: eveline

NB>..this is a vicious circle, if we are playing the blame game here. If Rudra doesn't bring TRPS, neither does the female lead Paro. But yes, Rudra is the stronger, more interesting, attention grabbing character here...and for me and plenty more, he is the reason the show is held together. Paro does not hold the show, or the viewers.

Originally posted by: Naach_Basanti

Hi, are you watching the show?

Yes I'm with Ekta. Content is King. Actors dont make or break a show. the whole aura of stardom works on the big screen because magic can happen for 2-3 hours. You cant sustain a show just on the basis of stardom for years and years together.

i dont find the show boring, but highly inconsistent and lop-sided especially in the last month. there are some really good actors in the show, but most under-utilized.

Originally posted by: serialjunkie

hola NB

i've sent the link of this thread to saurabh tiwari - it will definitely increase TRP of this thread, if not the show :))

i share your concerns, and i had voiced it with my RR missing woman's perspective thread. Of course, everyone misunderstood that I mean RR creative needs a female writer, not my point at all.

anyway, i watch for masala and romance. Paro's character is neither rural nor urban, neither firebrand nor docile. She is an average of all feelings and averages don't do well in daily soaps. you need extremes to stand out from the crowd.

I am also beginning to ask if Sanaya should do more character study of Paro. She must feel what we are feeling, right? If she is not asking her director the same questions we are, then all I can say is she might be taking her popularity for granted. When you work in the midst of strong performances, you have to be very protective, very diligent and very alert about the impact your character has on screen. This is of course the most unpopular conclusion, but I can't help feel it that at times, Sanaya takes Paro's role for granted

Originally posted by: Naach_Basanti

Rudra gives me a headache, Paro is incosistent- to me.

So one's emphasis can be reduced and the others increased. No harm in doing that, is there?

Im sorry i dont ever recollect paro's character getting the focus, ever. Unless I have been watching another show.

Originally posted by: serialjunkie

hola NB

i've sent the link of this thread to saurabh tiwari - it will definitely increase TRP of this thread, if not the show :))

i share your concerns, and i had voiced it with my RR missing woman's perspective thread. Of course, everyone misunderstood that I mean RR creative needs a female writer, not my point at all.

anyway, i watch for masala and romance. Paro's character is neither rural nor urban, neither firebrand nor docile. She is an average of all feelings and averages don't do well in daily soaps. you need extremes to stand out from the crowd.

I am also beginning to ask if Sanaya should do more character study of Paro. She must feel what we are feeling, right? If she is not asking her director the same questions we are, then all I can say is she might be taking her popularity for granted. When you work in the midst of strong performances, you have to be very protective, very diligent and very alert about the impact your character has on screen. This is of course the most unpopular conclusion, but I can't help feel it that at times, Sanaya takes Paro's role for granted

Originally posted by: Star_girl

I have watched a few episodes, yes. Say for about a month, and I am sure it's my problem, but I speak for my family as well. The show is the garden-variety Nautanki PH show with weak female lead, and annoying male lead. Which started off as interesting, has become this bland mess. My opinion entirely. I am sure there are people who love the show. Just not my thing.

Originally posted by: Naach_Basanti

Eveline you and I are talking completely different things. while Im talking about character development you are talking about an actor's screen time.

So lets just agree to disagree.