Just for you...MR. AKHL!! - Page 9

Originally posted by: Khalrika

What bothers me about this person is how she is excluding anyone else. We have been like one big family here. We go into any topic and post. Yes, we do post all kind of wisecracks even in very serious discussion topics (I remember how everyone was when I thought Vibs had said Sagars had many wives. Chandra dosen't let me forget that even now. 😆). Also, there were lots of wisecracks when I posted the different versions of the Ramayan last month. At the same time we, as members, have had very heated and serious discussions on topics related to Ramayan, purans, and epics. However, never once has any member told other members to get out of the topic and to stop posting. We have all laughed, joked, cried, and been serious together. It is the attitude of this member which is bothering me and not a different point of view.
What bothers

Originally posted by: Khalrika

If u had bothered to go through the whole forum and looked at the different versions of the Ramayan that we r discussing, u will understand what I am talking about. U don't seem to have done that have u? Also, I was not making fun of God at all.

U just barged into this forum and had this very private "fight" with another member in a very public manner. It is not your point of view that I have a problem with but I do have a problem with the way u went about it.

Originally posted by: desichica

Hmmm....i wud have actually done that if ur initial post wasn't so mean towards akhl....as u see, we have plenty of ppl here who have fun and humor...ur such a big devotee of Lord Krishna...shudn't u know to also have fun in ur seriousness too...after all he didn't reciev the name Natkhat for nething....it was given by his very own Yashoda maya!!!! And again u keep pointing fingers at every1 making the assumption....when every1 here has told you we dont mind your POV but u def do like to enforce it as the REAL FACT and it was all in the manner which you came about with ur post (like Khalrika di stated to you)!!! Its like akhl said...you only read bits and pieces of wut every1 rights and then make ur own theory from it!!!!

Originally posted by: Mallika113

Oh, "Hare Rama, Hare Krishna", I can't believe this topic has grown 10 pages! When I saw the heading, I thought this post was about complimenting Mr. Akhl! I did not know this was a courtroom! I don't know too much about this topic, so I am running as fast as I can from here, not physically, but mentally! Goodluck everyone!

Originally posted by: Khalrika

Chandra, u r too funny! I was waiting for yr wisecracks. 🤣🤣🤣 Drama is good guys. I agree with Chandra. So many poets and dramatists wrote crazy "interpretations" of the Ramayan. Why not give our own interpretation of the purans and epics? 😆😆

Chandra's: Shiva is a manifestation of Hanuman 😆

Mine: Balram is the father of Krishna 😆 Because Vasudev was killed by the Krtya witch sent by Ravan to Ramji's camp in Tretya Yug. It was deflected by Shiva (who is actually a manifestation of Hanuman) and the witch fell into Dwapara yug. Because of the time travel , Krtya got Alzheimer's and killed Vasudev instead making Balram the father of Krishna. 😆
😆

Suniti, thanks for the thumbs up for my post. ex-mando 😆😆😆

😆

Originally posted by: desichica

So wut else is new😕....ur reply has been the same or similar to almost nearly every1 on your thread

Originally posted by: Khalrika

What bothers me about this person is how she is excluding anyone else.

Who hve I excluded? It goes to you then that you shud do more reading cause I hve had convo and good convo with rupali, ananya and tannistha here. And I am hving a decent debate with Akhl too. So your not-so-good-attention is what bothers me about you. Making your own judgements and yet you said you hve read every page. 👏👏

We have been like one big family here. We go into any topic and post. Yes, we do post all kind of wisecracks even in very serious discussion topics (I remember how everyone was when I thought Vibs had said Sagars had many wives. Chandra dosen't let me forget that even now. 😆). Also, there were lots of wisecracks when I posted the different versions of the Ramayan last month.

Thats nice, I hve been a member of IF since 2006 and not just last year, I know most Global Mods. here and CMs and are friends with them so they would tell you that I hve been in topics like these and done more than wat you are saying here of wisecracks etc. and like its said, been there, done that. However, if someone new wud come in the forum, we wud let them know that the Forum functions this way rather than like you are saying, "We here are a big family" etc. and making it look as if I am not welcome. And its ok even if I am not welcome.

At the same time we, as members, have had very heated and serious discussions on topics related to Ramayan, purans, and epics. However, never once has any member told other members to get out of the topic and to stop posting.

I didnt tell you to get out of the topic but to not make judgements about me as a person/member posting here. You and desichica are writing all that you feel about me without knowing anything so thats really irritating. You ppl say alot like family and sticking together etc. so in that you leave out the new person, eh?

We have all laughed, joked, cried, and been serious together. It is the attitude of this member which is bothering me and not a different point of view.

What attitude dude? I hve also done that with those who hve tried to understand me here/included me in their convo. But you, even wen I hve told you wat has took place and wats taking place, still you want to keep only one portrayal of me then I really cant help it. You hve chosen that I believe. So go ahead, it doesnt bother me but you judging me and that too wrongly def. does bother me. 👏👏

Originally posted by: desichica

Yeup di...i agree....its like a guest going to some1's house and telling the owner's of the house to live a certain way then the way they actually have been living a certain lifestyle...wow kya thought hai!!!!😆😆😆