Just for you...MR. AKHL!!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#71

Originally posted by: Khalrika
No one is trying to give a negative image of u here. I have read all the pages but I get the impression, from yr posts, that u r trying to force yr views on everyone else. It's almost like "Aha! I won the debate" kind of impression I am getting from yr posts, that is all. Also, I am not against u and for Akhl. I believe the same thing that Akhl believes which is Krishna is a purna avatar of Vishnu.

Well, like you are saying that you get the impression so & so then same way I did too from ur post. How am I forcing the views? Like I said, I am writing what it is stated in the scriptures. You can believe wat u want and I m writing what I hve read. Simple as that. And if your getting that imperssion then I cant help it, can I? I hve already cleared my POV, so I am done from my side

Quote

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#72

Originally posted by: desichica
Lolz...Chandraketu..i agree with u to the T!!!! and i def am 🤣🤣🤣 on the part of Shiva being a manifestation of Hanuman!!!! I mean ur right there shud be drama to this forum...wudnt be complete....after all our forum is def filled with fun and humor!!!!

I wud say the same for u desichica, read and learn rather than making fun. What all I hve written, they arent my presumptions but rather what the scriptures say. So rather than making unnecessary comments in the topic which has already been told twice not to do, you shud either read or write something of point.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#73

Originally posted by: desichica
Well said Mando di....errr...Khalrika di!!!!👏

And my reply to you wud be the same as was to hers.

Quote

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#74

Originally posted by: Khalrika
Chandra, u r too funny! I was waiting for yr wisecracks. 🤣🤣🤣 Drama is good guys. I agree with Chandra. So many poets and dramatists wrote crazy "interpretations" of the Ramayan. Why not give our own interpretation of the purans and epics? 😆😆

Chandra's: Shiva is a manifestation of Hanuman 😆

Mine: Balram is the father of Krishna 😆 Because Vasudev was killed by the Krtya witch sent by Ravan to Ramji's camp in Tretya Yug. It was deflected by Shiva (who is actually a manifestation of Hanuman) and the witch fell into Dwapara yug. Because of the time travel , Krtya got Alzheimer's and killed Vasudev instead making Balram the father of Krishna. 😆
😆

Suniti, thanks for the thumbs up for my post. ex-mando 😆😆😆

😆

Care to make a seperate topic for all this? I think something imp. is going on here so you can take all this somewhere else and write, isnt it? And I dont think that you should be making fun of god even in this or any other way. If someone has got information opposite to yours, doesnt mean you start making fun of other info. What you may know may not always be right or complete information. Understood?

Quote

Khalrika

@Khalrika

Voyager

Posted: 16 years ago

#75

Originally posted by: ~angelz16~

Care to make a seperate topic for all this? I think something imp. is going on here so you can take all this somewhere else and write, isnt it? And I dont think that you should be making fun of god even in this or any other way. If someone has got information opposite to yours, doesnt mean you start making fun of other info. What you may know may not always be right or complete information. Understood?

If u had bothered to go through the whole forum and looked at the different versions of the Ramayan that we r discussing, u will understand what I am talking about. U don't seem to have done that have u? Also, I was not making fun of God at all.

U just barged into this forum and had this very private "fight" with another member in a very public manner. It is not your point of view that I have a problem with but I do have a problem with the way u went about it.

Quote

Mallika113

@Mallika113

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 16 years ago

#76

Oh, "Hare Rama, Hare Krishna", I can't believe this topic has grown 10 pages! When I saw the heading, I thought this post was about complimenting Mr. Akhl! I did not know this was a courtroom! I don't know too much about this topic, so I am running as fast as I can from here, not physically, but mentally! Goodluck everyone!

Quote

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#77

Originally posted by: ~angelz16~

I wud say the same for u desichica, read and learn rather than making fun. What all I hve written, they arent my presumptions but rather what the scriptures say. So rather than making unnecessary comments in the topic which has already been told twice not to do, you shud either read or write something of point.

Hmmm....i wud have actually done that if ur initial post wasn't so mean towards akhl....as u see, we have plenty of ppl here who have fun and humor...ur such a big devotee of Lord Krishna...shudn't u know to also have fun in ur seriousness too...after all he didn't reciev the name Natkhat for nething....it was given by his very own Yashoda maya!!!! And again u keep pointing fingers at every1 making the assumption....when every1 here has told you we dont mind your POV but u def do like to enforce it as the REAL FACT and it was all in the manner which you came about with ur post (like Khalrika di stated to you)!!! Its like akhl said...you only read bits and pieces of wut every1 rights and then make ur own theory from it!!!!

Quote

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#78

Originally posted by: Mallika113
Oh, "Hare Rama, Hare Krishna", I can't believe this topic has grown 10 pages! When I saw the heading, I thought this post was about complimenting Mr. Akhl! I did not know this was a courtroom! I don't know too much about this topic, so I am running as fast as I can from here, not physically, but mentally! Goodluck everyone!

OH NO DI...PLEASE DONT DO THAT!!!! We all need the likes of judges with a sense of humor such as you, Khalrika di, and def Chandraketu!!!!! Dont run...*pulls you back with imaginary rope*...lolz

Quote

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#79

Originally posted by: ~angelz16~

And my reply to you wud be the same as was to hers.

So wut else is new😕....ur reply has been the same or similar to almost nearly every1 on your thread

Quote

Khalrika

@Khalrika

Voyager

Posted: 16 years ago

#80

Originally posted by: Mallika113
Oh, "Hare Rama, Hare Krishna", I can't believe this topic has grown 10 pages! When I saw the heading, I thought this post was about complimenting Mr. Akhl! I did not know this was a courtroom! I don't know too much about this topic, so I am running as fast as I can from here, not physically, but mentally! Goodluck everyone!

What bothers me about this person is how she is excluding anyone else. We have been like one big family here. We go into any topic and post. Yes, we do post all kind of wisecracks even in very serious discussion topics (I remember how everyone was when I thought Vibs had said Sagars had many wives. Chandra dosen't let me forget that even now. 😆). Also, there were lots of wisecracks when I posted the different versions of the Ramayan last month. At the same time we, as members, have had very heated and serious discussions on topics related to Ramayan, purans, and epics. However, never once has any member told other members to get out of the topic and to stop posting. We have all laughed, joked, cried, and been serious together. It is the attitude of this member which is bothering me and not a different point of view.
What bothers

Quote

1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13

Just for you...MR. AKHL!! - Page 8

Related Topics

Explore Topics