Just for you...MR. AKHL!!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#11

@Tan: ummm, can u back urself with me "starting a fight"...where did u come up with that idea in the first place...u already know that i'm a vital member of this forum, so y r u telling me to chill?!!!!

@angelz: I like how now ur defending urself as well and pointing fingers at me for defending myself!!!! And when i did point out that the info is very much to our understanding, did i once say that ur info is wrong...i dont think so!!!! That was ur understanding of wut u thought i meant...not wut i really meant!!!!!

This wud have been a scripture debate only if u had made sure ur post did not start off with "the crap avinash wrote on another forum"!!!!!

Its like u said, we wud have def hit it off too then....i dont mind looking at two sides of a story or perspective...but u openly said rude things towards avinash which is y i had brought that up first!!!!!

Quote

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#12

Anglez16,
How can I ever forget you? Welcome to the Ramayan forum. I feel so honoured that you remembered me even after so many months. You did not find me in MB forum. Then you came looking for me here. To quote you, "I was always waiting for this day when I would reply back touyou" Wow, wow! So for so many months, you remembered me daily. Really a great honour for me. Thank you, thank you so much.😛

You have made this post in the forum and not in a PM. Therefore everybody has the right to participate.

I have told you many times in MB forum also that you should keep in mind some basic tenets of argument, which you always ignore.
1. As usual, you start your argument by saying that I wrote all crap. Then you say that you are here to prove me wrong. This means that whatever you want to prove, you assume that to be true in the start itself. This is called circular argument, which is not considered a valid argument at all.

2. You gave examples of some verses, which show Krishna as supreme. I never denied those. So you assume me of having said something, which I never said and then you set out to prove me wrong.

3. You read my posts very selectively - not in full. And you conveniently ignore the rest.
In MB forum, I wrote clearly that there are verses, which show Krishna as supreme. But, at the same time, there are also verses, which show that Krishna is a portion of Vishnu. In MB forum, I wrote clearly where it is written in Vishnu Puran. I even explained how all these can be reconciled by quoting the verse

om purnamadaha purnamidam poornaat poornamudachyate
poornasya poornamadaaya poornamevaavashisyate.

Meaning:-That is whole, this is whole, from whole comes out of whole. If whole is subtracted from whole, still whole is left.

But you very conveniently ignore all such arguments of mine.

You have read lots of things in scriptures, but you consider only those parts of the scriptures, which directly support what you believe in and ignore everything else.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

ananyacool

@ananyacool

Voyager

Posted: 16 years ago

#13

Thanks angelz 16~ for the info on Shrii Krishna.

Yup he is the supreme, absolute who appeared on earth 'as it is'.

Originally posted by: angelz 16 ~
Cause my scriptures are those which are authored by Rishi Ved Vyas and such.

Not to nip tuck you but not all the scriptures that you've posted here are actually authored by Ved-vyasa ; he 'compiled' them, hence the name 'Vyasa'

Even the Mahabharata is not wholly attributed to him ; his original work was called 'Jaya' which had 9000 shlokas, his disciples Lomarshana and Sauti added more verses which were called Bharata and finally Mahabharata with approximately 1 lakh verses.

Providing great info is really appreciative but if it is without humility , it always attracts criticism. I don't know what happened before, but just wish to say that if you are correct and IF others were wrong but that doesn't mean its a crap.

(I apologize if my say here is not welcome)

Quote

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#14

haha....u edited ur post! lol otherwise i wud hve quoted ur post where u said that their info is of understanding to u! Its ok, even though I cant show it, u urself know! :D One shud know from within rather than others telling. It was not my understanding.

And secondly, when u hve a bitter past with someone then u obv. are aggressive. Look at us, we dont even know each other and yet are debating cause ur defending someone u know; so wat do u think I wud hve said to someone with whom I share a bitter past one on one.

Anyways, can we just knock it off now otherwise the second page will be filled with this too.

Quote

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: akhl
You read my posts very selectively - not in full. And you conveniently ignore the rest. ..And just how can u say that? 😕
om purnamadaha purnamidam poornaat poornamudachyate
poornasya poornamadaaya poornamevaavashisyate.

Meaning:-That is whole, this is whole, from whole comes out of whole. If whole is subtracted from whole, still whole is left....SO?

You have read lots of things in scriptures, but you consider only those parts of the scriptures, which directly support what you believe in and ignore everything else. I can say the same for u. Wat hve I ignored? Why dont u tell me that!

Ahh, the man in the need of the hour. Lets leave the sarcasm bit and all the other things that u wrote cause I am so not like into fighting with u for unnecessary things. I got limited time on my hand and so I ll write watever is necessary unlike you who is still writing wat was in the past. LOL!! But ya, let me tell you that I didnt remember you but I remember that I hve to prove that Lord Sri Krishna is supreme and thus I am here.

So, next, I hve written from sooo many scriptures that Lord Krishna is supreme and you hvent as yet brought up those many points. I think majority wins. I am ahead of u right now. Why dont u bring up points from scriptures which support wat u believe.

This is like a shastrarth where sages like Adi Shankar etc. used to debate on scriptures and the one with more valid points won.

Edited by ~angelz16~ - 16 years ago

Quote

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#16

ummm...yeah so angelz...u think i edited the post for a reason which u think right....well let me put it this way...ur on RAMAYAN FORUM...and i believe if i have edited wut u think i did than thats ur opinion again...go look at the timing of my post and editing time...i ONLY edited the word Know to No in my last sentence...and as for u saying about the "understanding" part...go check it out...its still there!!!!

I've said my part and done my part..i dont need to prove myself otherwise...and i think by Avinash's post, my point is proven as well!!!

If you wish to continue to argue bout this...u may do that urself now...but i dont ever hear the last word and nor will i ever!!!!!

K Thanx!!!

Quote

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#17

hmmm... Avinash...it looks like some1 is really getting defensive bout themself now....easier to point fingers, and another scenario when the tables are turned!!!!!!

Quote

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: ananyacool

Thanks angelz 16~ for the info on Shrii Krishna.

Yup he is the supreme, absolute who appeared on earth 'as it is'.

Not to nip tuck you but not all the scriptures that you've posted here are actually authored by Ved-vyasa ; he 'compiled' them, hence the name 'Vyasa'

Even the Mahabharata is not wholly attributed to him ; his original work was called 'Jaya' which had 9000 shlokas, his disciples Lomarshana and Sauti added more verses which were called Bharata and finally Mahabharata with approximately 1 lakh verses.

Providing great info is really appreciative but if it is without humility , it always attracts criticism. I don't know what happened before, but just wish to say that if you are correct and IF others were wrong but that doesn't mean its a crap.

(I apologize if my say here is not welcome)

I say here again, with hands on my heart, that what I wrote is with total humility. Bit of the things were cause of a bitter past b/w me and Akhl which I am ready to forget and so I post on further :)

And ur say is most welcome. I am no-one to stop u :) thanks for ur post. Much appreciated :) And Idk why but I feel this love now with a 2 positive replies. Thanks otherwise I was feeling kinda weird...hehe! :P

Anyways, back to the topic :D

Quote

anku-

@anku-

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 16 years ago

#19

Desi:-- gurl, I think theres nothing left b.w us. Whom I needed is here and I ll debate it out with him. No hard feelings and peace out!

Quote

desichica

@desichica

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#20

ur right there is nothing left between us...so maybe u shud heed Avinash's advice!!!!! Stop reading in between lines....and maybe u shud read Ananya's statement again...she didn't completely say u were right and neither that u were wrong....Love how u assume u've got support just cuz one person supported u so far....and if u really looked at my first post...i never once went against you!!!!! No hard feelings from my end either dear!!!!

I only defended Avinash!!!!! That was the only part you took offense to!!!

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 13

Just for you...MR. AKHL!! - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics