Anyway, I digress. Back to this story - Lakshman firing arrows & wounding Sita - π€’π€’π€’ It's not comparisons w/ ASR, but these sort of depictions that are likely to sink it.
Actress Sanchita Ugale Dies By Suicide
In her own league. BBV marks 8th consecutive flop for Kangana
Bollywood is back!!!!!
Gadar 3 starts next year
Official Trailer - Pritam And Pedro
🏏India vs Afghanistan, 2nd ODI, AFG tour of India 2026, Lucknow🏏
Anyway, I digress. Back to this story - Lakshman firing arrows & wounding Sita - π€’π€’π€’ It's not comparisons w/ ASR, but these sort of depictions that are likely to sink it.
Ok, if there is a basis for it in HP folk tales, I guess I can stomach it. Although it's not there in Valmiki that Ravana attended Sita's swayamvara - I think that Krittivas (the Bong Ramayan) may have been the first to put Ravana @ Mithila. Otherwise, why would Shurpanakha have had to describe to him what Sita was like, if he already knew?
Also, in Valmiki, Shurpanakha's hubby is Vidyutjeeva (lightning tongue), who was killed by Ravan himself. But Shurpanakha never re-married, and instead lived w/ Khar & Dooshan.Anyway, I digress. Back to this story - Lakshman firing arrows & wounding Sita - π€’π€’π€’ It's not comparisons w/ ASR, but these sort of depictions that are likely to sink it.
Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath
Arti, I have a question. Is this story which is based from Himachal Pradesh exactly as the Sagars have shown it, or did the Sagars take some creative liberty with the story as well? Because if it's exactly as it was written in the source, then who is real and who is fake? Was it the real Sita with Ram, and if so why were Ram and Sita meeting before marriage???
I am sooo confused, and the fact that they even did not finish it yet made me so angry this morning, lol!
its not mentioned that banasur took sita or lakshmana form ...it is said that he advanced towards sitaji he wanted to steal her... but wen he saw grand form of ram and lakshmana he was scared to deadth he disappeared quietly... thats it... may be they have added their own spices or maybe there is another story which i m not aware of π³
Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath
I was confused because FB said Lakshman was possessed and Sita was not Sita.π Thanks for clearing it up. Now I'm curious where this particular story came from.Btw, still waiting for you in you know where.π
Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath
I was confused because FB said Lakshman was possessed and Sita was not Sita.π Thanks for clearing it up. Now I'm curious where this particular story came from.Btw, still waiting for you in you know where.π