would you vote and why?? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

27

Views

2.5k

Users

12

Frequent Posters

200467 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#21

I believe in voting. If we don't vote, how will we make sure we have done our bid to weed out the losers like Varun G who has nothing but hate as his political base or Rahul G who is good for nothing loser so far be it his personal or professional life? Both losers have turned to woo the Indian masses in a bid to cash on their family name and making some more moolah out of it.

Came across this article in TOI today. I totally agree with Shobha Dey's analysis of both pea brained empty heads competing to cash out the same last name using different routes to woo the Indian voters. Read on.........
POLITICALLY INCORRECT

Political babes in the woods

22 Mar 2009, 0243 hrs IST, Shobhaa De
Varun Gandhi is a babe. So is Rahul Gandhi. In fact, these elections are dominated by the Babe Brigade. Nearly all the newbies on the block fall
into the babe category. Most are Pamela Andersons of politics, cashing in on the oomph factor. 'Babewatch' rules. Pamela had silicone in her breasts. Desi Babes have silicone in their brains. No issues.

It's sexy to be in politics these days. Especially if your surname is Gandhi. You can bank on the family name to save your butt after opening your mouth and stuffing both feet into it. As Varun has done with his recent hate speech. If jaws dropped, he didn't notice them. Or perhaps, he doesn't really care. This babe has made it to the front pages of nearly every newspaper, with TV channels greedily gobbling up every bon mot uttered by Maneka Gandhi's beta. He himself insists love means never having to say you are sorry... and to hell with what civil society, the EC and others think of his outrageous, preposterous, provocative and ? pardon the word ? rabid comments. Mom Maneka has protected the interests of animals for years. She must know how dangerous a rabid dog is. What on earth was Varun thinking? He now claims it was a doctored CD that got the natives worked up. That's a babe comment. He also adds he is proud of his faith, not apologetic about it and that he is a "Gandhi, a Hindu and an Indian in equal measure." Jai Ho, bete. Bhagwan tera bhala karey.

I am not a Gandhi (Thank God for small mercies!), but i am also a Hindu and an Indian. Unapologetic on both scores. But i don't want to cut off anybody's hand or gouge out eyes to prove my credentials as either. Sensibly, the BJP has promptly distanced itself from the speech and the orator. But that's the easy part. First you get an out-of-control babe to go out there and bak bak. Then the big boys back off leaving the babe to face the music. By then the damage (or the dirty work) is done. Smart! But sometimes being oversmart has a nasty way of backfiring. As has happened in Varun's case. This Gandhi Babe is looking bad as compared to the other Gandhi Babe, who dimples away prettily and sticks to the safe and narrow script. The faux pas so far have been harmless and largely inoffensive. Babe Rahul has stuck to the moderate path approved by Mama and other party veterans. He has not grabbed too many headlines, but his style of netagiri is distinctly different from his cousin's. Which is not surprising given the political ideology of their respective fathers.

Gandhigiri is not the sole prerogative of these two families. But try telling that to the faithful. The scary thought is that Varun's bluster may pay rich, short-term dividends. Just like his father Sanjay Gandhi's once did many moons ago, when he instigated his mother Indira Gandhi to impose the Emergency (surely one of the most shameful periods in modern India's history). Sanjay found takers galore for his demolition drives and other autocratic moves to 'improve' Delhi.

It was a short and tragic love affair, but ominous while it lasted. Perhaps Babe Varun's minders are hoping he, too, will have the 'Sanjay Effect' on the gullible who might confuse his aggression and immaturity for dynamism and daring. One can only hope he remains in a minority of one. Someone should remind him that netas like Sanjay briefly streak across the political sky before burning themselves out and disappearing into a black hole. India has always voted with its head and heart and unfailingly chosen moderation over extremism. That has been the pattern so far. And chances are that is how it will continue. Bigotry and hate have been traditionally defeated by those who offered the middle path. That should give us all the hope we require to see us through the coming ordeal. Leaders who challenge democratic principles may succeed as regional satraps (Narendra Modi, please note), but any leader aiming for national acceptancy instinctively knows it is just one thing that is going to do the trick this time ? the promise of stability and security for all. The last two words are key ? 'for all'.

Babe Varun has been misguided by his handlers. Winning Pilibhit may be comparatively easy. But winning the hearts of Young India will require much more than a baring of teeth. This babe's bark had better be worse than his bite. Time to get rid of that silicone, sweetie.

Edited by Gauri_3 - 16 years ago
_Angie_ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: sandya_rao7



the problem with indian politics is there are not many educated people here. and they dont consider it as a career. bcoz if it is tht then there will be competition to perform better than the other. but i gues this will only be if we have educated and clean image people in politics.

Yeah thats right, more educated , dedicated & progressive minded ppl need to take active part in politics so that the criminals & opportunists R out numbered. Just a handful of do gooders in the murky field of politics wud B inadequate to make any major difference in present scenario . All the same I wud vote at least to keep keep the most unworthy person out if not for anything better 😆
jagdu thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#23
What are the options? A monarchy🤢 such as in some arab countries, a dictatorship😉such as the one in Zimbabwe/Cuba, martial lawsuch as in Iran, communism as in China👎🏼, or some sort of a mix as in Jordan🤪? Not to talk about oligarchies😈. Democracy provides the best 🤡carnival😆😎🥳among all the systems.
http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=941252&TPN=33
Edited by jagdu - 16 years ago
3365 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#24
yep! i think democracy is the best option. though there should be some changes made to it.
trustt thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: jagdu

What are the options? A monarchy🤢 such as in some arab countries, a dictatorship😉such as the one in Zimbabwe/Cuba, martial lawsuch as in Iran, communism as in China👎🏼, or some sort of a mix as in Jordan🤪? Not to talk about oligarchies😈. Democracy provides the best 🤡carnival😆😎🥳among all the systems.

http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=941252&TPN=33



Communism as in China will help us become a strong nation... care to agree with me?😊😊
jagdu thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#26
Communism as in China will help us become a strong nation... care to agree with me?😊😊

Naah, it is too authoritarian a system. It means production workers will be disciplined as long as the boss is looking. Once he turns away, then the worker will dodge.

Besides, the political system in China does not afford easy procedures to start a business. India is comparable to the best in the world, and there are amongst the fewest numbers of procedures.

Most of all, China supresses the rights of tibetans, and will on some future date take over Hong Kong, I'm afraid. Maoists have already infiltrated into Nepal and their next goal is India. China does not recognize Sikkim, it occupies a major part of Kashmir as well as areas in the northeast.
The worst thing about communism is that it does not promote religion. That in itself is not bad, but what about those who cannot survive without practicing religion? Communities cannot gather to worship.
Edited by jagdu - 16 years ago
_Angie_ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#27
Democracy is preferable anyday to other forms of govt . If there R shortcomings in the form of unsuitable candidates then we shud make sure that they R ousted . If there is not much of a choice being offered in the form of a good candidate then we shud see to it that honest ppl do get a chance to contest & win elections. Anyone willing to jump into the political fray ? 😉 😆
200467 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#28
Even if we vote and vote sensibly --- all we can do is make sure the least corrupted person gets selected in a country like ours. Sad but true - hai na.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".