Originally posted by: Me_Harini
Hrithik’s behaviour isn’t just personal resentment anymore - it feels like the narrative itself is quietly excusing selective accountability, where emotional convenience becomes justification and uncomfortable truths are simply ignored. That shift is especially jarring because Hrithik was one of the most genuinely lovable children before the leap and watching that be dismantled so abruptly feels less like character evolution and more like narrative convenience. This choice by makers weakens the conflict instead of deepening it.
With Angad, the inconsistency is even more glaring. Even if we go with khudgarz (which I initially misheard as khuddar), the reasoning still collapses. Angad knows Ranvijay is selfish , so how does it make sense for him to trust Ranvijay with his shares, especially when the company is already in financial freefall? If selfishness is the defining trait, then handing over power isn’t strategy, it’s reckless abdication of responsibility.
That’s where the writing loses credibility for me. Instead of letting decisions emerge from character logic, it feels like labels and shortcuts are being used to force the plot forward. Add the rushed pacing on top of that, and the episode ends up feeling less intentional and more like a filler and chaotic episode.
1.4k