Created

Last reply

Replies

306

Views

23.8k

Users

46

Likes

1.1k

Frequent Posters

Moor278 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Sherry24


As usual a good one ❤️


I'm now trying to apply the same approach. Focus on the kids. They have to be the catalyst, whichever way it goes.


Two things here.

Very important - You know Ghum's philosophy is a lil different. Evil always with an upper hand.

Otherwise why do you think this happened.

Sammy boy blessed his sister to have a happy family of four with 2 kids - a boy and girl. But he sees that his evil baiko is posing as a hindrance. So his spirit enters her body and stand in front of the car to get her killed, yet she gets saved. See even the good spirit of Sam could not fight the devil in P.

Hence proved - Thats how strong Ghum is on evilness. They have time and again proved it. 🤣


Two - Promise a serious one 😉. You would understand this aspect better. I know P is a bad actress. We have not been able to accept her change of heart yet. And quite possibly it could be true as we can't take it on her face value.

But there are subtle things which gives the audience a certain perspective. They are not vocal or very evident. It is just how it is created on screen in its entirety that we just get the gist. But if they ask us, we cannot really pin point on what is it particularly that made us think in that way.

Yes, JM is a bigger villain, yet we could believe his transformation not P's. Yes, he is far better actor and hence much more convincing. But is that all? Do you not feel that there are things.. those subtle nothings that make us believe that P hasn't changed, or is capable of flipping anytime?

The spider promo aura continues. It looks like it is the same P..cunning and scheming. Like the same dark look. Her whole getup. We have spoken about the horrible suits Sai wore vs the beautiful Sarees P was given. Now see the switch. Yet P looks vampish in that. I know this switch happened before leap, but there is a stark difference now. Something symbolic of a progression. Most importantly, P hardly wore vermillion when she was married to Sam, except on some occasions. But now she is mostly seen with it. She shares no real marriage with V just like with Sam. So what is the difference. Her adamance. What she said in the party. She only loved V. Hence this is the only marriage she believes in. That vermillion is her way of showing to the world that she has won him now. These are just examples. But I'm talking about such subtle things that we may or may not notice but they are put together thoughtfully to present a picture in the background which we subconsciously pick up and our understanding of the character is then based on it.

Hope I was making some sense 🤣

Thank u 💓

You made total sense...


I responded to nethraa in other comment on this...

There are 2 Ps now... 😁... and not mental illness ones...


Lover P has not changed. Has no guilt and no remorse...

Only the mother P has changed. And in times of stress for Vinu she overpowers the lover P.


This might also to do with the fact that she wants to control the narrative if she knows about this being original Vinu like our doubt 🤣

nutmeg7 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Correct. Vinu’s adoption is already out. It is Savi’s turn next. Vinu’s parentage will be after a long time. Because between Savi and Vinu’s reveal, Virat will be torn between farz and pyaar with 2 parivar

Kumuda-123 thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: sadiltl


See if they are showing Virat as Lord Ram, there might be no marriage at all with Pakhi right? Think that way :)

BK wishing someone as RamSita jodi or comparing Pakhi to Sita is not same as Story/Plot showing SaiRat as Ram Sita. BK calls Sai ghar ki Mukhiya one day and Manhoos the other day. So yeah, context and character both are important.

I have a good feeling if Virat is compared to Ram or plays Ram. In general they dont use these references just like that.

But if they show otherwise then I pity them. :)

They used Ram Lakshman reference through virat after cafe kaand implying pakhi as Sita.

He indirectly called pakhi Sita after that woman suggested him to elope with her. When they can do that thing, then they can do anything.

Making virat play ram character is biggest joke. When ram is one man woman while virat is jagatpati.

Even if the marriage is fake(which is impossible), will it undo the companionship, domestity, parenthood, couple thing they share since years.

1250301 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

They used Ram Lakshman reference through virat after cafe kaand implying pakhi as Sita.

He indirectly called pakhi Sita after that woman suggested him to elope with her. When they can do that thing, then they can do anything.

Making virat play ram character is biggest joke. When ram is one man woman while virat is jagatpati.

Even if the marriage is fake(which is impossible), will it undo the companionship, domestity, parenthood, couple thing they share since years.

U meant what? Episode uploaded? It means no hope left?

689471 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Hey Sway, I really cannot deal with this misogynistic narrative that is being served to us.

I am really questioning, who really are the TRP audience?

CVs know all are still viewing their show with the hope that Sai gets justice.

No one is truly sticking around for TralRat.

Edited by Olive_Rose - 3 years ago
Shaome thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: sadiltl


See if they are showing Virat as Lord Ram, there might be no marriage at all with Pakhi right? Think that way :)

BK wishing someone as RamSita jodi or comparing Pakhi to Sita is not same as Story/Plot showing SaiRat as Ram Sita. BK calls Sai ghar ki Mukhiya one day and Manhoos the other day. So yeah, context and character both are important.

I have a good feeling if Virat is compared to Ram or plays Ram. In general they dont use these references just like that.

But if they show otherwise then I pity them. :)

Arre yeh kuch nehi..Its another SaiRat lollipop to convince audience..also the purpose was to trigger Sai bai ..

These makers are disgusting in highest order that can be assured..So misogynistic narrative

Rosyme thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

I think they will show only his father s angle with Savi.

In anger that she hid Savi, he will side with P for a long time..she will.be his wife till end of the show . They will.reveal vinu s parentage around Holi maybe.

Don't know if he will be good to Sai or not.. doubtful.

Because they dont let him realise his mistakes.

Now he will say u took away both kids.from me.

Vinu as they think he's no.more and now.Savi.

Edited by Rosyme - 3 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".