Tum kya kar logi - #1 INVITE ONLY (DT Note pg 109) - Page 83

Originally posted by: CaffeineMuggle

What more do we expect from bigamy stanners lol ? 😆 Everyone who stans bigamy have very hypocritic skewed morals.

Marrying two people after only a matter of weeks is fine apparently but lord forbid, if a divorced woman finds a companion whose presence she is comfortable with.

It's a crime if you try to uplift and morally support a woman whose world tilted off her axis and you try to save her from the self harm you think she is about to inflict upon herself. It's a crime to care about the possibilities of her getting assaulted somehow if she sleeps in a public bench while her ex husband was still sharing house with his gehri dost.

No matter how much we say our society has progressed, it's always the fault of the woman. Especially if it's an emotionally abused one or a Divorcee, and the man/people associated with that woman. It's always their fault. While the men are the heera betas who constantly ask themselves ki "Hum galat kab the ?"

Yeah blaming women is so much easier!

My favorite (?) narrative has to be the one where Imlie is somehow more responsible than AKT for being unfair to Malini, which is...something. Like okay, sure, Imlie is absolutely not blameless (from what I can tell, haven't watched) but..... come on. HE decided to hide his first marriage/wife and marry his fiancee instead of coming clean and saying, "Hey, so it was life or death for us there, that place is ruled by mobs, but this is what went down. This girl is taking the marriage way too seriously because of the sociocultural upbringing, let's try to help her out and be sensitive to her beliefs but resolve this so that you and I can get married" which is what a rational adult would do.

Is it cool that Imlie was romancing her sister's husband? No. But do i blame the 18 year old kid who grew up in a rural setting, with minimal exposure to the outside world, and takes marriage VERY seriously due to the lived experiences of her mother more than the 34 year old award winning journalist, who had seen more of the world, and of life, and was an actual adult? GOD NO. No matter who you stan, there's something so off with putting the blame on Malini and Imlie for Aditya's actions.

Originally posted by: aye-masakalii

Yeah blaming women is so much easier!

My favorite (?) narrative has to be the one where Imlie is somehow more responsible than AKT for being unfair to Malini, which is...something. Like okay, sure, Imlie is absolutely not blameless (from what I can tell, haven't watched) but..... come on. HE decided to hide his first marriage/wife and marry his fiancee instead of coming clean and saying, "Hey, so it was life or death for us there, that place is ruled by mobs, but this is what went down. This girl is taking the marriage way too seriously because of the sociocultural upbringing, let's try to help her out and be sensitive to her beliefs but resolve this so that you and I can get married" which is what a rational adult would do.

Is it cool that Imlie was romancing her sister's husband? No. But do i blame the 18 year old kid who grew up in a rural setting, with minimal exposure to the outside world, and takes marriage VERY seriously due to the lived experiences of her mother more than the 34 year old award winning journalist, who had seen more of the world, and of life, and was an actual adult? GOD NO. No matter who you stan, there's something so off with putting the blame on Malini and Imlie for Aditya's actions.

Also, woh jo forbidden late night romance Malini se chhup chhupake hote the ghar ki 18 saal ki domestic help ke saath, did Aditya have no culpability in it?

Aru somehow 'groomed' Imlie into divorcing Aditya but yeh sab clandestine bullshit grooming nahi tha, lol.

Hi all,

Just because you are in the CC forum, this does not mean that rules have ended here. The basic IF rules still apply.

Mocking and bashing fangroups, fans, or celebs, and namecalling characters, celebs, or fangroups is not allowed in any forum. CC is not exempt from these rules.

Remember to review the rules. And note that making the post and then editing it does not mean that it isn't considered a violation. It still is.

Please keep the CC rules in mind when making posts here. We do not want to move to the next steps of closing down a CC.

Regards,

Chat Clubs DT

Originally posted by: Minionite

Hi all,

Just because you are in the CC forum, this does not mean that rules have ended here. The basic IF rules still apply.

Mocking and bashing fangroups, fans, or celebs, and namecalling characters, celebs, or fangroups is not allowed in any forum. CC is not exempt from these rules.

Remember to review the rules. And note that making the post and then editing it does not mean that it isn't considered a violation. It still is.

Please keep the CC rules in mind when making posts here. We do not want to move to the next steps of closing down a CC.

Regards,

Chat Clubs DT

Hi, thanks! Always good to have reminders of good conducts.

Are we a) allowed to call fictional characters by the attributes canonically assigned to them by the show/film writers or would that be mocking? Am I allowed to describe Shah Rukh's fictional character in Kabhie Alvidaa Na Kehna as a misogynist adulterer who was jealous of his wife's professional growth or should I use the floral language like middle-aged, lonely man, whose big bad wife always got promotions at work, slept with another woman circumstantially to describe the character so that the real actor's fans don't get hurt?

b) Which fandom shall we be mindful of when we are discussing about random unrelated people and/or cultural trends like, say, the Kawai dress-up subculture in Tokyo? Do certain collective/universal/abstract nouns refer to particular fandoms that we must be aware of?

Asking these here in good faith for further elucidiation so that we don't make the same mistakes.

Many thanks!

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Hi, thanks! Always good to have reminders of good conducts.

Are we a) allowed to call fictional characters by the attributes canonically assigned to them by the show/film writers or would that be mocking? Am I allowed to describe Shah Rukh's fictional character in Kabhie Alvidaa Na Kehna as a misogynist adulterer who was jealous of his wife's professional growth or should I use the floral language like middle-aged, lonely man, whose big bad wife always got promotions at work, slept with another woman circumstantially to describe the character so that the real actor's fans don't get hurt?

b) Which fandom shall we be mindful of when we are discussing about random unrelated people and/or cultural trends like, say, the Kawai dress-up subculture in Tokyo? Do certain collective/universal/abstract nouns refer to particular fandoms that we must be aware of?

Asking these here in good faith for further elucidiation so that we don't make the same mistakes.

Many thanks!

Can you rewrite this in layman's terms so that whoever wants to report it can understand? Not that they read it but just want to make it easier for the hard workers.

Oh no. Here too! 👀 everywhere.

Originally posted by: Bea1

Oh no. Here too! 👀 everywhere.

looks like people are taking the name of the topic seriously 😛 should we change it to..... "I don't care", another great dialogue of Aryan Singh Rathore?

Originally posted by: Chintapandu

looks like people are taking the name of the topic seriously 😛 should we change it to..... "I don't care", another great dialogue of Aryan Singh Rathore?

Maybe we should rename it to another of his dialogues? "Baby, please..."

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Maybe we should rename it to another of his dialogues? "Baby, please..."

Now or next thread 🤭

I'm game always 💃

Vote ladies

Like for now

Heart for next thread

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Maybe we should rename it to another of his dialogues? "Baby, please..."