Originally posted by: PureDrivenSnow
Anjali made a valid point about the women (daughter-in-laws) of the house being educated but non of them earning. They said they're happy doing what they do. But is it really about wanting to be housewifes or the instilled mindset that good indian married women manage the home? Like a good education is just a means to get married into a good house. Afterall, all ambitious or career-oriented women on the show are 'villians'. In fact, there are very few female ambitious or career-oriented women on ITV that are shown in a positve light.
This is why I find Aatya an extremely interesting character. She's no less conservative than the rest but she realises the value of being self-sufficient. I really do hope she continues to work in future.
This. ALL THIS.
Every show we watch has leads who were ambitious mostly before their lagna.
Anjali IS right. Every kanitkar soon is a homemaker, education or not, and obviously not by choice na? Distay tyanche navre kahi Karu shakle naste.
So yes, they're branded as evil vamps if they do ANYTHING WESTERN (Food, drink, clothes or even thought)
Once any soon says apan flat made rahu Ghar vikun even that thought is considered impure( of course vikna selfish ahe). But how dare she break a her husband away from his family (even though she had to leave hers cos "parampara")
Aso, my point is Kanitkars are conservative af under the garb of being "samanya".
I can just hope things change for a progressive show.
On today's episode, how can someone be so shameless/ignorant? Direct baiko and muli la gheun alay bhaskar ?
He knows he has hurt them by ghosting them years ago and now he wants to flaunt his new family in front of them?
461