Are you for equal pay for actresses? - Page 12

Poll

Answer

Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

117

Views

6.3k

Users

35

Likes

207

Frequent Posters

807116 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: himmo100

Poll numbers have increased

A whopping 55% think that decision to pay should be based on merit and not gender.

Thanks for agreeing with my point.


Saying, pay should be based on merit does not imply agreeing with you.

I also say, it should be based on merit (profit the star brings). But I still feel, the current system is unfair.

I agree with the fact that Khans are The brightest student group in the class. But when the teacher awards 4 Marks for Katrina, 60-70 marks for Salman, I call it unfair. Not because, Katrina is female. But because I feel, she deserves more than 4.
When Ranbir and Deepika are equally good, if one gets 30 marks and other gets 10 marks, I call it unfair. Again not because, Deepika is a female. It's because, she is equally meritorious as Ranbir.
454573 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
all of ur pain is covered under definition of merit

so marks of katrina will be adjusted

but point is it will not be given based on her gender
astha36 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

Stars are responsible for initial week days and weekend collection. Then this collection gets multiplied by a factor deciding on WOM. If WOM is extremely good, it might make 10 times the initial week end collection. If not, it might stop at 3 to 4 times.

Screenplay plays a role in this multiplication factor. Yes. On its own, it might be nothing (single digit). But when it multiplies with 20 crores, it yields a bumper.

Good screen plays cannot make a Raj Kumar's movie collect 100 crores (if it's initial week end collection is around 10 lakh).
But it can decide whether a Khan movie collects 80 crores or 240 crores.

May be, everyone should go for profit sharing.
Screen writers should get a profit share of 2nd or 3rd week end's collections. People won't come for the star on 3rd week end. They will only come if the film is good (which is based on screenplay and direction).
Similarly music directors and singers should get a share in music rights. Stars cannot sell music. If so, why Dangal's music is not as hit as the movie?


Rajkumar's movies are not commercial masala movies, at least most of them are not. For India's market, a masala movie will always have more chances of working with the audience and then a good screenplay will be a bonus. It is true for all the stars.

With the Khans, the fan following has increased so much over the last few decades they have been that yes they ensure a good opening. But the Khans are a unique case and there are no such superstars after them. Why does everyone in this thread bring their example to prove why there is pay disparity or why screenplay is not as important? They are an anomaly. After them, or even alongside them, the other stars struggle if the movie doesn't have a good screenplay or it isn't entertaining enough.


The thing with good content, like I said before, is that it will bring in more audience.. the people who don't care about Bollywood right now. That should be the aim for the industry because that is where the growth is.
Rangaaa thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: rogerrocks


I know you will disagree but star power is overrated IMO. Yes having a Salman or Shahrukh helps but at the end of the day, most blockbuster films are a combination of several factors. Why dint Race 3 make as much as BB? Because BB was the better and more entertaining film. Yes a superstar can salvage trash upto a point but there is a reason Aamir delivers ATBBs. And it's not his star power. It's simply because he does better films. Anyway forget the Khans. They get a share in the profits anyway and they have a substantial fanbase. That is not the case with most other actors. I don't see why an Abhijath should be paid ten times lesser than a Ranbir or a Ranveer. He has a better success rate than most of these actors in Bollywood 😆My point was simple. Stop paying these exorbitant sums to actors (the ones producing will anyway get a share in the profits), pay your writers and other technicians reasonably well and focus on better stories.

If it's not star power then wht is it?He has highest number of record grossers in hindi cinema...He has record openings as much as the other Khans...
Terenaina thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
Superstars bring in the money, have you notice, recent Khan movies that flopped was close to 200 crore collections. Of course it would be nice if they made decent stories that's why Aamir is smart in picking content over glamour. The other two khans needs to choose content also
Terenaina thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
Difference between young generation actor and old generation actors, Ranbir's biggest flop movie BV reached 23 crore collection while recent Khans biggest flop movies reached 100-200 crore opening week collection 😆
rogerrocks thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: raj80

If it's not star power then wht is it?He has highest number of record grossers in hindi cinema...He has record openings as much as the other Khans...


I don't think you got my point. I was only talking about the fact that you cant deliver ATBBs just on the basis of star power. Aamir delivers the highest grosser mainly because he does good films unlike the other Khans. It had nothing to do with Aamir's lack of fan following or star power 😆
Rangaaa thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: rogerrocks


I don't think you got my point. I was only talking about the fact that you cant deliver ATBBs just on the basis of star power. Aamir delivers the highest grosser mainly because he does good films unlike the other Khans. It had nothing to do with Aamir's lack of fan following or star power 😆

ok 😊...fan following not lack of fan following 😊...
Edited by raj80 - 7 years ago

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: sharaban

6 months ago

ARE RANVEER & VICKY EQUAL LEVEL OF NEPOS AS OF RANBIR ?

Have your say, Plz vote comment.

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Rangaaa

1 months ago

Anurag Kashyap slams Tseries: They don’t pay for the quality of music

They only pay for who is the star in it. They don’t pay for the quality of music. Anurag Kashyap has expressed his experience of working with...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Amira21

16 days ago

Any outsider actresses that made big without Godfather?

Most of the outsiders that made big usually had Godfathers or they came from beauty pageant. Like Juhi, Ash and PC came from beauty pageant and...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Amira21

2 months ago

Which actresses created chemistry with most actors?

I can only think of Kareena and Katrina that made chemistry with most of the actors that they worked with. Other than them, other actresses were...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Amira21

2 months ago

Anyone fan of this generation actors actresses?

I only like Shradda from this generation. Other than her, I can’t like anyone as my favorite actor or actress because I find most of them boring...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".